PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

and yet, you've not only read it, you've put the link on here. Just ignore the tossers and stop doing exactly what they want you to do....
Did I?
I don’t believe I did.
I read a headline and copied the link without going to there page.
I posted it on here as I found the headline so absurd it was laughable.

So despite your assumptions I’m not sure I did what they want me to do.
 
Did I?
I don’t believe I did.
I read a headline and copied the link without going to there page.
I posted it on here as I found the headline so absurd it was laughable.

So despite your assumptions I’m not sure I did what they want me to do.
Fair enough, although that’s only if nobody else clicked on it, after you posted it.
Just don’t give them any attention, whatsoever. They know we’re a tad sensitive at the minute so any negative stuff will be clicked on by rags, dips, tarquins, a few others and City fans. The only bit we can control is the last bit and that’s by ignoring it.
 
Note how long they gave the parties to check for typos (although someone did tell me today that City's expectation is that they would receive the decision the same day as release). 1 whole month!
That seems a bit of a strange one, the club or even the PL can’t be expected to do a thorough read through before the release in that case.
 
This makes the optics war very difficult. No time to prepare statements etc and a ton of information in the judgement to wade through. Presume we have a team on standby to do just that.
If we are cleannon the main allegations (fuvk the non coop ones), I guess thr PL will need to tread extremely carefully...
 
there arent many owners who would go through all these fights from so much constant attacks from the PL and the media.
huge reputation loss, constant smear campaigns, serious legal costs, honestly hardly any other owners in PL would have survived this and would fight this much crap year on year.
 
We're guilty so the longer there's no decisions made public, the better as far as I'm concerned
How do I know?
Alice said so in her video

She makes @slbsn look like the financial charlatan he is
Would this be Alice Einstein Abraham ?
She waves her arms around more times than Kermit the frog
 
Not sure if it's been mentioned in here and probably doesn't really matter to city but lord pannick is back in the high court on a totally unrelated case ( it's about the VAT on private schools) Surely if a verdict was due he wouldn't be taking up the case? Maybe someone with a better legal brain than me can inform us
 
Another post closer to 10,000
View attachment 151618
At uni I had a friend who confessed undying love for me, hard to believe I know. I turned her down. She left uni soon after and my so called best mate then informed me that she was a multi million pound heiress. It was true too. Her family owned huge swathes of Yorkshire and Wales. Why didn’t my mate tell me this earlier?
My life would have been oh so different.
 
Not sure if it's been mentioned in here and probably doesn't really matter to city but lord pannick is back in the high court on a totally unrelated case ( it's about the VAT on private schools) Surely if a verdict was due he wouldn't be taking up the case? Maybe someone with a better legal brain than me can inform us
Pannick leaves minor matters to others, dont’ya know.
“My work here is done. You look after the verdict, young man; I have bigger fish to fry.”
KC, a mere Mister, tugs forelock. “Yes m’lud. Certainly m’lud.”
(Only 78 pages to go.)
 
Last edited:
At uni I had a friend who confessed undying love for me, hard to believe I know. I turned her down. She left uni soon after and my so called best mate then informed me that she was a multi million pound heiress. It was true too. Her family owned huge swathes of Yorkshire and Wales. Why didn’t my mate tell me this earlier?
My life would have been oh so different.
Is he still your mate ?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top