calumdown
Well-Known Member
perhaps this goes some way to explaining why simon cliff said what he said during a.o.b.Us accusing Arsenal of financial doping is peak fucking trolling. I'm onboard with this 1000%
perhaps this goes some way to explaining why simon cliff said what he said during a.o.b.Us accusing Arsenal of financial doping is peak fucking trolling. I'm onboard with this 1000%
Totally. One of THE most clueless posters on here.Going off your standard prescience then that’s a guaranteed victory in the 115 then. Woop.
One of my favourite posters you mate. You’re wildly underrated on here.It’s almost like we know the result…
This is a huge hard signal imo. You don’t start taking the league and other clubs on from a position of weakness.
I can’t see a negative. City have gotten the league by the balls. The real financial cheats is the very same club that termed the phrase “financial doping” and wrote it on a letter.
Now we are getting somewhere. No wonder that **** bloom won’t sell to us.
i wonder what the reasoning is that the article's focus is city having a pop at arsenal, when in fact, of the 4 clubs mentioned, arsenal had the least amount of money loaned to them?
Going off your standard prescience then that’s a guaranteed victory in the 115 then. Woop.
i wonder what the reasoning is that the article's focus is city having a pop at arsenal, when in fact, of the 4 clubs mentioned, arsenal had the least amount of money loaned to them?
Completely different panel. One is a disciplinary panel, the other is the tribunal for a rule X arbitration. So the APT panel is one where we chose one arbitrator, the PL chose the second and the third was agreed between the two chosen arbitrators. The 115 panel was chosen by the PL.I suppose we could ask if APT2 is starting because the 115 is finished?
He’s been here 14 years mate how long do you need?Jury Still Out On Tevez City for me
He does "pretentious posting" to gather fan support rather than "effective posting" which benefits the team thoughHe’s been here 14 years mate how long do you need?
I like him tbf.
I’ve thought that for a long time but if he’s a rag rather than just fucking clueless then he’d be the most ‘committed to the bit, sad fuck’ the forum has ever seen. So I tend to side with clueless.Jury Still Out On Tevez City for me
your jury may have form for this...Jury Still Out On Tevez City for me
It’s almost like we know the result…
This is a huge hard signal imo. You don’t start taking the league and other clubs on from a position of weakness.
I can’t see a negative. City have gotten the league by the balls. The real financial cheats is the very same club that termed the phrase “financial doping” and wrote it on a letter.
Now we are getting somewhere. No wonder that **** bloom won’t sell to us.
He does "pretentious posting" to gather fan support rather than "effective posting" which benefits the team though
your jury may have form for this...
![]()
Jury protest forces fraud trial collapse after 2 years
Attorney general orders inquiry into failure of Jubilee line corruption prosecutions.www.theguardian.com
It’s almost like we know the result…
This is a huge hard signal imo. You don’t start taking the league and other clubs on from a position of weakness.
I can’t see a negative. City have gotten the league by the balls. The real financial cheats is the very same club that termed the phrase “financial doping” and wrote it on a letter.
Now we are getting somewhere. No wonder that **** bloom won’t sell to us.
Completely different panel. One is a disciplinary panel, the other is the tribunal for a rule X arbitration. So the APT panel is one where we chose one arbitrator, the PL chose the second and the third was agreed between the two chosen arbitrators. The 115 panel was chosen by the PL.
So there's no overlap between the panels, and any overlap between the lawyers is a non-point because we know the 115 hearing concluded last year. And we know from the APT 2 decision that City had already launched the APT 3 arbitration by the end of January: para 69 of APT 2 says
"However, there remains for decision (in the fresh arbitration commenced on 20 January 2025) whether the November 2024 Amended APT Rules are valid and effective."
All that's happened is that the statement of case we provided in January has now been passed to the other clubs, and - quelle surprise - it ended up being leaked.
No-one is starting another fight. This is APT2 starting up as planned. Take some chill pills.
I don't think anything you or I post on this forum will have any effect on the team.
We are here just expressing our opinions,thoughts, fears & wishes.
One of my favourite posters you mate. You’re wildly underrated on here.