Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
he was pushed not quite on his own accord.
Hopefully Savage goes next
Daily heil is running a story on the plaque and the author ain’t impressed.I see the anniversary of Heysel has been almost entirely ignored today
Any idea why he was pushed (obvious blue-tinted reasons aside)? Has something gone on?he was pushed not quite on his own accord.
Hopefully Savage goes next
Couldn't bring himself to report, or wasn't allowed to report?Diallo makes obscene gesture on overseas tour that is being covered in person by a bbc “journalist” but I suppose because it’s a negative story he couldn’t bring himself to report it, and had to be reported by someone else
I'd completely forgotten about Lilly Savage. Another talentless gobshite.he was pushed not quite on his own accord.
Hopefully Savage goes next
Given it was reported but by another person I assume the former not the latterCouldn't bring himself to report, or wasn't allowed to report?
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.
It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.
It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.
I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
Generally, online journalism is monitored for website hits, downloads and comments. The editors won't care what the content is, they just want customers so that they can sell content to advertisers. I used to think of the BBC as different to other commercial media but I am not sure that it is now. They do sell content.I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.
It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.
BBC would do this and more for the dippersI suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
Do they send Salford based reporters on pre-season tours, or do they just use the local BBC sports correspondent?BBC would do this and more for the dippers
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.
It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.
It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.
It didn't take long did it.
Play the racism card.
Agreed. She was awful. For once Sky did the right thing.So being utterly clueless and incompetent didn’t play a part in the decision to drop her? She should count her blessings she got an opportunity her skills quite clearly didn't warrant. No one will miss her warbling nonsense. Protected characteristics don’t come into it when you are utterly shit at your job.