Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Diallo makes obscene gesture on overseas tour that is being covered in person by a bbc “journalist” but I suppose because it’s a negative story he couldn’t bring himself to report it, and had to be reported by someone else
 
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.

It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.


I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
 
I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?

Because they are still sucking the (Red) Devils cock after banning the Piss Can, and grovelling to be allowed to report on United again.
 
I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
Generally, online journalism is monitored for website hits, downloads and comments. The editors won't care what the content is, they just want customers so that they can sell content to advertisers. I used to think of the BBC as different to other commercial media but I am not sure that it is now. They do sell content.

The best response to Man Utd articles is to ignore it, otherwise Simon Stone etc will be commissioned to write more.
 
I suspect there is more than just a whiff of client journalism going on here. Stone is essentially giving them 'free' publicity. I just wonder what the BBC and Stone get in return. Obviously, Stone gets his summer jollies paid for, but what else. Why do the BBC do this for no other club?
BBC would do this and more for the dippers
 
Sly United Spin Stone is at it again.

It’s an absolute disgrace that we are paying for this **** to go on another jolly at the expense of the BBC TV licence fee payer.


No longer contributing towards that cunts jollies. Finally convinced the wife that we no longer need to pay the licence as can do without BBC and player, loads of catchup on other platforms and firestick etc f**k em
 
It didn't take long did it.

Play the racism card.



So being utterly clueless and incompetent didn’t play a part in the decision to drop her? She should count her blessings she got an opportunity her skills quite clearly didn't warrant. No one will miss her warbling nonsense. Protected characteristics don’t come into it when you are utterly shit at your job.
 
So being utterly clueless and incompetent didn’t play a part in the decision to drop her? She should count her blessings she got an opportunity her skills quite clearly didn't warrant. No one will miss her warbling nonsense. Protected characteristics don’t come into it when you are utterly shit at your job.
Agreed. She was awful. For once Sky did the right thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top