While there's no denying there's probably more than a grain of truth in that list, it's only right to acknowledge that every single one of those criticisms has also been levelled at the Premier League.In the BBC Live Feed they have a section describing the CWC as a tournament marred with problems:
They seem to have conceded then that there are some well attended games.
- Unfavourable weather conditions
- Uneven interest in the tournament
- Huge gulf in quality of teams
- Fixture congestion and player burnout
- Politicisation of the sport
- Rich clubs getting even richer
Some of the points are valid but the politicisation that the BBC are referring to is a minority stake that a Saudi investment fund has in DAZN the broadcaster. We are supposed to be horrified by this. I am not. The UK is global decline but it can hardly condemn the Saudi state after Britain's role in the middle-east. The BBC's editorial role reflects their imperial political view of the world.
Perhaps the CWC is only the logical conclusion of the path first forged by the not-so-great and the greedy of Football, over 25 years ago?
Equally, the BBC and the British media in general have formed for calling it wrong when it comes to the globalisation of sport. The European Cup, the World Cup, the Heineken Cup, the Rugby World Cup... all were derided and debunked, without consequence to the growth of said tournaments.
Finally, I blame Kier Starmer. If he had only done a Tony Blair to UEFA and written a "please sir, can Liverpool play too" letter, the BBC would have conveniently forgotten everything on that list and be right behind this.