"I've never seen the Epstein evidence. It wasn't in my lane, but I have the same concern and question that a lot of people do."
www.mediaite.com
Oh oh.
“Meaning that, to their [Trump DOJ] minds, investigative reporters and others, there have to be accomplices—uncharged accomplices. And that aspect of justice is still missing,” Garrett added as Johnson replied:
"Yes, and it’s a great concern to us. I mean, we want full transparency. We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils—let’s call it what it was—to be brought to justice as quickly as possible."
*snip*
“This is not a hoax, in other words?” Garrett clarified.
“Oh, it’s not a hoax. Of course not,” Johnson replied immediately.
I don't suppose his constituents have been on the phone?
Anyway, he sends Congress into recess to stop votes to release Epstein files causing even greater pressure from below...then later goes into an interview on CBS and says it's not a hoax and there has to be transparency and it is "evil(s)"...not "boring" as Trump said. *strokes chin*
I did read that a few days before the WSJ piece on Trump JD Vance had been the guest of the Murdochs somewhere, memory fails. *strokes chin again*