Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
It is from about 20 different media outlets & 2 different AI platforms.

And they're all likely wrong. Capology has him on 15k and that also has Liverpool's overall wage bill as just £156m.

Their wage bill in their last accounts was £381m, so well over double. And that was for a season where they played in the Europa League (and didn't do very well in it), and were third in the Premier League.

These sites are utterly pointless if they are more than £200m out for the overall wage bill.
 
Does FFP not apply to the Bus Wrecking Twats?
It's different for them.

Liverpool FC operates on a thing called "net spend"

I know this because Sly Sports and the BBC sports desk have been bending over backwards to explain it to anyone who will listen.

I've never seen so much effort put in by a media outlet, to convince the general public that what LFC are doing is all above board and well within the financial regulations.

It's getting a bit awkward now. It feels like a small child trying to convince their parents they haven't just drawn all over the walls in crayons.

If Liverpool sign Isak they would have spent £266,500,000,00 on two players. That's going to take some spinning.
 
Its kind hilarious that they are attracting top players with a no name manager compared Klop. Maybe Klop was a twat that players didn't want to work under him.
 
Whilst posting on their own forums that they don't care about City.
I don't believe I have stated your assumption anywhere.

We are all just human beings. We happen to follow a different football club.

For all 'you' know I may have opened a door to let you go through first, given you my seat on public transport or let you be served first at the bar. When these things take place no one surveys a person on which football club they follow.

I've enjoyed the last decade. Win or lose. In 2019-20 I saw us go 25 points clear or something like that.

6 Months later I was diagnosed with bilateral vitamin b12 deficiency neuropathy. Life can be harsh.

Worrying about someone posting that they do or do not care about a rival football club is a frivolous waste of time.

Don't tar everyone with the same brush.
 
Yeah, but they have stirred the shit now, as they did with Van Dyke, and the stink will be all over Isak.
What is ironic is that Liverpool fans booed Trent for honouring his contract but have no problem tapping up another player to the extent that he has to train alone. Such a bunch of self-entitled hypocrites.
 
What is ironic is that Liverpool fans booed Trent for honouring his contract but have no problem tapping up another player to the extent that he has to train alone. Such a bunch of self-entitled hypocrites.
Was unaware that I booed Trent Alexander Arnold. Also unaware that I have tapped up Alexander Isak.

I didn't agree with the booing nor did I agree or like when Pierre Van Hooijdonk downed tools at Nottingham Forest. My position hasn't changed. It doesn't reflect well on the individual.

What I can say is that Arsenal Fc are widely known for their self entitled fanbase. Whether that is a true reflection or not. I don't know. IF it is then that would make your post ironic.
 
Paisley Gates has the number as 67k per week. Liverpooltimes also went with a big number.. bumper new contract from Feb 2024.. they might be talking nonsense..but he had broken into the England team already..so it seems about right..to me..
I do not recall him signing a n ew contract in 2024. Those places you mention I have never seen before nor seen used as a valued source of genuine information.

The contract he signed in2022 would include bonuses/incentives/clauses. I 'd already posted about this prior to you replying. I expect him to be offered a new contract/extension in the next 12 months. He has 2 years remaining.

When a promising young player signs a new deal it ends up plastered all over social media. So when a first team player signs one I expect to find article after article about it. I don't see any.

The young players and lower wages comes from Brendan Rodgers era. A structure was put in place so that young players would be incentivized over their contract rather than get too much too soon.

I don't believe he is still on 15k but i don't believe he is on 115k or 67k either. Thinking about it, games played, goals scored, assists, Motms and international appearances, he may well have maxed out those incentives and gets triple his 15k (45k) p/w by now. When I said 25k I didn't mull over the possible incentives long enough.

On his next deal 70/80k plus further incentives seems plausible. Should he already be on higher wages given his contribution? that's a whole different story.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top