eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Or Anthony, Mason Mount, Casemiro etc etc etcCan he calculate Pogba?
Or Anthony, Mason Mount, Casemiro etc etc etcCan he calculate Pogba?
1. Agreed, new signings and younger players to work with should be great for Pep. This is not mentioned in the piece.This really doesn't feel overly negative or critical from Wilson.
We all saw what Pep looked like during the rough patch last winter. He has talked about needing a long break. I'm sure there's enough guys on here who have gone through a divorce without the trouble of it being put out in the open. He has been in management surprisingly long now (his first UCL title is 16 years ago).
It's not unusual to have these questions. We all know Pep is closer to the end than the beginning with us. He obviously gets the benefit of the doubt due to his record and I think I think having a lot of new signings in the last 8 months is going to be great for him as far as a new challenge and younger players to work with, but this is far from a hit piece.
Said no football fan in the history of the world…Due to PSR it is more of a thing.
That negative difference of £13m directly affects PSR calcs.
If they sold him for £30m next year instead, it would be a positive (for United) of £8.5m on PSR. If they sold him for £30m 2 years down the line it would be £30m positive for PSR.
That’s why selling Rashford for any figure would be a positive for United regarding PSR - as he cost £0 to buy, so the value of amortised remaining is £0.
Garnacho, due to low buying cost, would also be a positive PSR.
Sancho is similar to hojlund, but worse - longer and higher contract transfer fee.
I always remember the media jokers after his first season here and how he’d been ‘found out’. ‘You can’t play like that in the PL and win anything’.1. Agreed, new signings and younger players to work with should be great for Pep. This is not mentioned in the piece.
2. Pep looked visibly refreshed in the USA - but not mentioned.
3 .Pep has extended every contract with City. The press only gave him 3 years ! No mention of this.
4.Yes, Pep and others looked jaded last season for a variety of reasons.
5. Maybe Wilson has done a positive piece on City. I must have missed it. Agree, not an out an out hit piece. Interesting timing though.
6.Why is it assumed that Pep can not do what the manager at OT did?
1. Agreed, new signings and younger players to work with should be great for Pep. This is not mentioned in the piece.
2. Pep looked visibly refreshed in the USA - but not mentioned.
3 .Pep has extended every contract with City. The press only gave him 3 years ! No mention of this.
4.Yes, Pep and others looked jaded last season for a variety of reasons.
5. Maybe Wilson has done a positive piece on City. I must have missed it. Agree, not an out an out hit piece. Interesting timing though.
6.Why is it assumed that Pep can not do what the manager at OT did?
So what was the one article he wrote about football?Second rag article today from Slimy Stone on the BBC website.
That makes 31out of his last 32 articles THE CHIEF FOOTBALL CORRESPONDENT for the BBC has written articles solely about the rags
Tbf that first season kind of suggested that.I always remember the media jokers after his first season here and how he’d been ‘found out’. ‘You can’t play like that in the PL and win anything’.
Mind you, to be fair, there were a fair few on here saying the same…
I agree with much of the above and last season was not the best compared to recent, exceptional success, I have seen much worse.1. The article is about Pep, not City if that makes sense, so its more about the challenge of coming off of your first wave of success. And tbf it is the first team he's ever had to rebuild as we're the only club he's been at for over 4 years. So I understand the caution from Wilson, even if I'm one of those who thinks a much younger and faster team is going to make last year look like the anomaly that it was.
2. It was a preseason tournament. And the article doesn't exactly say he's on his last legs. And he's made the 15 year comment since then. We know he's likely near the end of his career. It's not anti-Pep or anti-City to suggest he has an eye on the exit door somewhere in the future. I dont think he gets sacked, nor does he blindside the office on when he's leaving. They'll have the replacement ready to go.
3. The purpose of this piece isn't fact checking every reporters take on Pep. As someone who has read a lot of Wilsons books, he tends to give Pep his due respect. And tbf there was a universal apprehension over how Pep would manage English football. Journalists get it wrong too. It's just opinion pieces at the end of the day.
4. Last season was an absolute mess. Team looked old, couldn't stay healthy, Pep had a divorce going on, 3 of our most influential players struggled with age and or injury (Rodri, KDB, Walker) and tactically we couldn't match the rest of the leagues energy for a while. But until we at least challenge for the title, that's the lasting impression of us. You're only as good as your last season.
5. Peps future is a constant talking point as he hasn't come out and tied himself down to a 5 or 6 year deal. And as for timing, the season starts in 2 weeks.
6. It's not assumed that he can't. But has Pep done anything to suggest he wants to.
Give Slippery his due, he is a creative critter.Simon Stone strikes again, now using 'Net Book Value' to make it seem like selling Hojlund for £30M would be less of a loss.
Since when, in the history of football transfer news, has anyone EVER used current net book value??
View attachment 164797
Salford City ?So what was the one article he wrote about football?
Also, to paraphrase another red arse licking bellend:Simon Stone strikes again, now using 'Net Book Value' to make it seem like selling Hojlund for £30M would be less of a loss.
That club must be so fuckin toxic they feel they can afford to put out negative press and de value their players. SCUM.Due to PSR it is more of a thing.
That negative difference of £13m directly affects PSR calcs.
If they sold him for £30m next year instead, it would be a positive (for United) of £8.5m on PSR. If they sold him for £30m 2 years down the line it would be £30m positive for PSR.
That’s why selling Rashford for any figure would be a positive for United regarding PSR - as he cost £0 to buy, so the value of amortised remaining is £0.
Garnacho, due to low buying cost, would also be a positive PSR.
Sancho is similar to hojlund, but worse - longer and higher contract transfer fee.
Second rag article today from Slimy Stone on the BBC website.
That makes 31out of his last 32 articles THE CHIEF FOOTBALL CORRESPONDENT for the BBC has written articles solely about the rags
It's a standard formula to determine the assets a company holds on a balance sheet. Generally speaking the net book value is determined by taking the purchase cost and then subtracting its accumulated depreciation to date. In terms of a footballer it's simply the difference between the transfer fee spent on the player, minus what has so far been amortised. If after 2 years a £50m player is sold , he will have a book value of £30m. That means that any sale over £30m is considered, within the accounts, profit. Anything under £30m is a loss.Give Slippery his due, he is a creative critter.
Not exactly sure what "Net Book Value" actually means ?
I presume he has started using this valuation, as it suits the Trafford Tramps with their current financial feck-up with "Junior Dot-to Dot" Hojiland (apologize to the original - Luke Chadwick) ?
Shame this Net Book Value wasn't mentioned with Van de Beek, Pogba or even Forlan ?
It has happened before.Also, to paraphrase another red arse licking bellend:
‘Whomever buys Hojlund is getting a 70m player for 30m’
The joke at the time was that they named a building in Manchester after him…… UMISTIt has happened before.
Remember Gary Birtles? He looked a world class player with Forest under Clough. He signed for United and was useless. He went back to Forest for peanuts and was back to form.
Also it was widely reported that when Terry Waite was released from being a hostage in Lebanon for 5years ,his first words to the world was, "Has Birtles scored yet"?The joke at the time was that they named a building in Manchester after him…… UMIST