No body said that though, some questioned if we buy him how he'd fit in with how we play, no one said Pep wouldn't have a plan if we did, just it would still involve building from the back.Look, what a tiny little fix!
And who would be perfect to save his ACL ridden legs?
Rodders. Life can be so easy...
But no, BM taught us it would destroy our extremely complicated 'system' as City w/o Eddie was unthinkable. Pff.
what if you're not a footballer and just a cock ;)I don't care how much a footballer or anyone else earns for what they do as long as they aren't a cock about it.
I bet that’s better than Sex and the CityView attachment 165948
La Stampa: Man City reaches agreement with Donnarumma for €12 million per year. City wants to negotiate with Paris for €35 million.
what if you're not a footballer and just a cock ;)
People can’t handle the idea a player we are buying has weaknesses.No body said that though, some questioned if we buy him how he'd fit in with how we play, no one said Pep wouldn't have a plan if we did, just it would still involve building from the back.
You wouldn’t need to change an entire system.The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.
Sure, but is not you, or me, it needs to make sense to.The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.
i may be a **** but im a poor **** ;)All cocks should be underpaid :)
The wider point is we all know them, people on a good screw and they claim poverty.
Cunts ;-)
Saga? This only became a serious link two days ago.The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.
The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.
i may be a **** but im a poor **** ;)
Sorry, but LOLNo body said that though, some questioned if we buy him how he'd fit in with how we play, no one said Pep wouldn't have a plan if we did, just it would still involve building from the back.
On top of which, a keeper that doesn't fit our system.Why on Earth are we signing yet another goalkeeper when we need a proper right back? What was the point in buying Trafford?
Surely you can see the irony in your last paragraph, and espefially the final sentence?The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.
Maybe Pep's system has changed. Teams have learnt how to deal with Pepball and maybe he is transitioning to a more traditional system.The entire Donnarumma to City transfer saga makes no sense to me. Pep's system is based on a keeper who is good with his feet giving us an extra player at the back.
Donnarumma isn't great with the ball at his feet and if we signed him we'd either need to change our system or we'd need to accept the consequences of Donnarumma's passing mistakes - which would likely more than offset his outstanding shot stopping ability.