It's Quiet the £250m return

The fuck are you on about? Who on here was screaming for us to sign any of

Delap
Joao Pedro
Gittins
Garnacho
Estevao
Hato
Frimpong
Kirkez
Ekitike
Leoni
Gyokeres
Eze
Norgaard
Hancapie

12 months ago?

Wirtz and Zubimendi are both good high profile signings, but the idea that we’re feeding off scraps compared to our rivals is ridiculous.
You can do the work yourself but if you are actually interested in knowing the answer to your question and not simply trying to "score points," you can go back through this section and find topics about some of these players. Others are mentioned in wider, general topics such as, "Players Who Might Improve Us."
 
You can do the work yourself but if you are actually interested in knowing the answer to your question and not simply trying to "score points," you can go back through this section and find topics about some of these players. Others are mentioned in wider, general topics such as, "Players Who Might Improve Us."

Yeah but apart from that ;-)
 
Mate, teams hit the ball into one channel & come at us down the other & through the centre. Our players can't vacate the centre, which leave both undefended wings as areas of attack & danger.

Since we lost our fear factor, teams have been using the same attacking tactic against us time after time. If we had four at the back, the opposition wouldn't have two empty & undefended forward areas of the pitch to attack us from.

If you look at the increasing frequency of similar attacks we face, that's where our main vulnerabilities lie. It's no coincidence.
And nor would we dominate possession. It is a risk and reward scenario but relies on some key principles.

Teams have been using the same tactic for a long time. With Rodri and some pace at the back, we nullified those sporadic attacks. We need that physical capability. It's why I advocate Khus at CB when Rico plays the inverted role. If Nunes plays then he becomes the counter-stopper and a centre-back like Stones or Gvardiol becomes the supplementary midfielder. The latter is the deepest of the CMs.

We cannot play a high line AND inverted full-backs without the physical reassurance of a tall CDM and a pacy defender. It is not a failing of the inverted role in itself.

We have also replaced several key players. The new ones will need time to understand each other and to press together. There are signs, but without the aggressive high-press, we will also open the opportunity for counters far more often.
 
And nor would we dominate possession. It is a risk and reward scenario but relies on some key principles.

Teams have been using the same tactic for a long time. With Rodri and some pace at the back, we nullified those sporadic attacks. We need that physical capability. It's why I advocate Khus at CB when Rico plays the inverted role. If Nunes plays then he becomes the counter-stopper and a centre-back like Stones or Gvardiol becomes the supplementary midfielder. The latter is the deepest of the CMs.

We cannot play a high line AND inverted full-backs without the physical reassurance of a tall CDM and a pacy defender. It is not a failing of the inverted role in itself.

We have also replaced several key players. The new ones will need time to understand each other and to press together. There are signs, but without the aggressive high-press, we will also open the opportunity for counters far more often.
Agreed to a point. My main gripe is the inverted FB being sussed, but Pep persevering regardless. If we look for another RB who can play it, we're out of luck because no one can think of one. It's a Rico Lewis position & Rico Lewis alone it seems.

If we went for a traditional back four with an over/underlapping RB, the market would suddenly open up for us. It seems we're looking for a unicorn multi-role player, who outside of Rico doesn't exist.
 
Agreed to a point. My main gripe is the inverted FB being sussed, but Pep persevering regardless. If we look for another RB who can play it, we're out of luck because no one can think if one. It's a Rico Lewis position & Rico Lewis alone it seems.

If we went for a traditional back four with an over/underlapping RB, the market would suddenly open up for us. It seems we're looking for a unicorn multi-role player, who outside of Rico doesn't exist.
We don't know what we are looking for. We don't know who we are negotiating for, if anyone.
The team knows the role that each player is asked to play and you cover each other's backs.
Rico seems to have carried the can with some supporters but that goal for Spurs was not on him - Stones, a great player, got his offside movement wrong and it opened up the whole chance.
Regardless, we had enough chances, and we cannot legislate for a pass straight to their attacker.
 
Agreed to a point. My main gripe is the inverted FB being sussed, but Pep persevering regardless. If we look for another RB who can play it, we're out of luck because no one can think of one. It's a Rico Lewis position & Rico Lewis alone it seems.

If we went for a traditional back four with an over/underlapping RB, the market would suddenly open up for us. It seems we're looking for a unicorn multi-role player, who outside of Rico doesn't exist.
I think Livramento would be good at it.
 
You can do the work yourself but if you are actually interested in knowing the answer to your question and not simply trying to "score points," you can go back through this section and find topics about some of these players. Others are mentioned in wider, general topics such as, "Players Who Might Improve Us."
Ah so if I pop into that thread I’ll see the likes of Marmoush, Cherki, Reijnders and Ait-Nouri filed under Skoda-level, B tier, whilst the likes of Delap, Pedro, Gittins, Garnacho, Norgaard, Kirkez and Leoni as top tier, A list, title deciding, must haves?

Alright then.
 
One thing it will do is expose the players who make mistakes and/or have insufficient recovery speed. In that respect, Saturday puts question marks against Stones and Lewis. It doesn’t mean we ditch them, but they can have no gripes if they’re benched and others tried.
Can’t believe you, and so many others, don’t attribute the biggest part of their 1st goal to Dias. Go and watch the replay again, I’d snag it and post it myself if I knew how, it’s a high floated ball down the line that he has an age to get in position for against Kudus, yet he is miles away from winning it and jumps nowhere near the ball which is what then releases Richarlison before Stones slips and Rico lets Johnson get away from him.

Deal with it properly like any hand decent centre half does and no problem.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top