I agree, but he's not what I'm complaining about, he does a great job in a very difficult circumstances, in his case I don't really understand why he puts up with it, but he's true to his profession.Steve Rosenberg their Moscow correspondent is very good - see my post above - personally I have no idea why the Russians haven't kicked him out
I agree, but he's not what I'm complaining about, he does a great job in a very difficult circumstances, in his case I don't really understand why he puts up with it, but he's true to his profession.
It's the ones sat here in safety, probably in salford, regurgitating the shit from the russian shrills I can't do with
It's quite frustrating really, it's like the reporting of City against the rag/dippers.Any of us could be proved wrong at any time, of course, and the frontline could collapse, but this seems highly unlikely to me, and a more likely collapse is the Russian economy, or at least a severe hampering to the point that it will impact severely on Russia’s capacity to continue to prosecute this war, and yet that hardly ever seems to get reported.
also those shilling for Zionists - the BBC has become rotten since Boris Johnsons appointments to the top brass - imagine that eh?
euromaidanpress.com
Not just the Russian people. The tentacles extend way beyond that. Their ability to convince swathes of people in the west that there was some sort of agreement about NATO expansion eastwards despite there being zero evidence in circulation to support it, being a case in point.The Russians have been sending small groups on suicide missions.
The groups dont know that they will get no support or supplies.
when they get to where they need to be,they send photos back to their command.
They are then left to be captured or whatever.
Command then use the photos to claim a breakthrough or the taking of a village,when no such thing has happened.
Russian propagandists push it none stop,and the Russian people belive it.
Slava Ukraini.
Not as boring as Mrs Brown’s Boys.Rubbish, the BBC is easy stick to beat and they get pelters from those on the left and those on the right - both sides thinks the BBC is against them. It’s boring.
Probably true but they do take sides so have polarised views of news rather than simply news.Rubbish, the BBC is easy stick to beat and they get pelters from those on the left and those on the right - both sides thinks the BBC is against them. It’s boring.
Yep - the main news providers in the west are silent on Russian defeats for some reason.bbc only post what putin likes, never much about the shit going on elsewhere where defeat is ongoing, especially at oil/gas terminals behind the lines, and the lack of fuel etc.
I refer you to the Sunny offensive. Initially successful but subsequently a disaster for Russia. Similarly for the recent Pokrovsk offensive.Is this something to worry about?
![]()
Ukraine admits Russia has entered key region of Dnipropetrovsk
Military says Russian advance "is the first attack of such a large scale" in industrial province.www.bbc.com
I note this report is gains in an industrial area so does this follow the same Ukrainian defence plan as fields etc?I refer you to the Sunny offensive. Initially successful but subsequently a disaster for Russia. Similarly for the recent Pokrovsk offensive.
Ukraine gives, watches what happens then strikes. It does not sacrifice soldiers to needlessly hold fields, tree lines and small villages.
I note this report is gains in an industrial area so does this follow the same Ukrainian defence plan as fields etc?
The furthest into the Region is here,about 4km in.Is this something to worry about?
![]()
Ukraine admits Russia has entered key region of Dnipropetrovsk
Military says Russian advance "is the first attack of such a large scale" in industrial province.www.bbc.com

It should be noted that taking industrial areas comes at the greatest cost to Russia. The Industrial area is a demolished wasteland once they have taken it.I think the honest answer is that we don’t know. The front line has been fairly static for months with territorial gains and losses on both sides with Russia gaining more albeit at huge cost.
I don’t pretend to have any insight, but I can’t see how this incremental territorial gain strategy at huge cost is sustainable.