How many titles did he help us win?
At a push, 1.
How many titles did he help us win?
At a push, 1.
I always thought he was pretty limited..even at Villa..buying fouls, often. Plenty of hyperbole from the media from simply knocking in a ball from the by line..if that's considered enough from a £100m plus player tgan fk me!Under a new manager, perhaps. The way hes being encouraged to get to the byline feels like the Jack of old.The shackles are off at Everton.
Embarrassing post
You need to cite sources if you're going to make wild predictions like that bud.Jacks 30 years old. I expect by this time next year he’ll be 31.
On that basis alone, his time with City is surely done.
We all look for different qualities in a footballer. Some will like Jacks some won’t. But one thing you can’t overcome is age.
For the record I’ve enjoyed Jacks time with us and wish him all the best.
Even at 60 I still remember one or three things from my mathematics degree.You need to cite sources if you're going to make wild predictions like that bud.
Is this how entitled we've become as a fanbase?At a push, 1.
Is this how entitled we've become as a fanbase?
"He ONLY helped us win ONE title"
He was crucilal in helping us win a title, and ultimately the treble. Yet some of our fans treat him like he's Weah or Robinho.That is fair, as a standalone remark.
But a bit out of context to both your and my points.
He was crucilal in helping us win a title, and ultimately the treble. Yet some of our fans treat him like he's Weah or Robinho.
Fact is, he loves this club, he loves our fans, he loves City, he is his own biggest critic, he is a confidence player and he's been down on it for a while, he's had a huge 'price-tag' criticism he's tried to shake off since day one, it was OUR expectations of him that some label him a 'waste of money' when he never played that way for any other team. We didn't buy him to score goals, we bought him to make them, and as I pointed out previously, those stats are never listed; it's either goalscorer or assist, not the guy who got the ball up into position in the first place.
He worked hard, hardly put in any 'worst player' performances, was usually a catalyst in turning around results, won free kicks, was a master of shithousery, was usually the last guy to give the ball to the assister, popped up with a few himself and revelled in every title and cup win we ever had along with us.
But that £100m tho....
When you're right, you're right, it's a load of rubbish and complete bollox.I have a theory that is probably a load of rubbish but I think a call was made by the club to cut ties to protect our golden goose, Erling Haaland. Obviously the two had become great friends but I think Grealish’s general professionalism, in particular his drinking, was at risk of rubbing off and the club thought best to move on.
As previously said this is just simply a thought I had, could be and probably is complete bollox.
He was crucilal in helping us win a title, and ultimately the treble. Yet some of our fans treat him like he's Weah or Robinho.
don’t Think so. The ship has sailed . Everton might buy him for a lower fee than 50Mil of course. ( before I get banned from the usual Grealish thread )
I wouldn't fret about that. There'll be plenty more posts like that on the match thread tonight!As previously said this is just simply a thought I had, could be and probably is complete bollox.
Ah, you must have thought I was comparing and not talking about how City fans feel about him on a professional level.Did Grealish score 14 goals, get 19 g/a in the league ever in any season?
Doesn’t help to further your point mentioning Robinho.