it 100% happens and I don't care what anyone says.
They must give a fuck if they have a ticket compliance manager. - Or perhaps not.It's like the club don't give a fuck.
We have been here before haven't we?
They must give a fuck if they have a ticket compliance manager. - Or perhaps not.
Actually City will give a fuck if it's an unauthorised reseller as they don't make anything out of it.
The club care if someone else is making a few quid at their expense or a ticket is being passed to someone else at face value they could sell on for additional profit to a reseller site.They must give a fuck if they have a ticket compliance manager. - Or perhaps not.
Actually City will give a fuck if it's an unauthorised reseller as they don't make anything out of it.
Had a phone call from City today in response to me reporting my son’s derby ticket being sold on a to a tout site. Had a decent conversation with them.My adult son’s ticket was available for the derby. Bad timing as he’d booked holiday before fixtures out. Put the ticket on Ticket Exchange and it got snapped up in seconds.
Yesterday the lad who bought it told me he’d paid £200 for it via SeatPick. He said he followed Barcelona and was neither a City nor a united fan. Said he’d never been to a Prem game before so wanted to go to a high profile one. He may have been blagging about not being a rag so not to blow his cover but I’ll give him benefit of the doubt as rest of what he said rang true.
Point is this is another example of the club inviting us to sell spares via Ticket Exchange but passing it straight to a tout site. I’d not experienced it myself before and will make sure I do everything I can to sell any future spares directly.
It was just a typo that has long since been corrected.BBC say they got a ticket for the south stand but the picture clearly shows a view from the north stand unless it's a stock photoView attachment 169953
They probably were. A City member called Mr S Pick bought the ticket and then mysteriously it gets sold on SeatPick. Figure it out....
Had a phone call from City today in response to me reporting my son’s derby ticket being sold on a to a tout site. Had a decent conversation with them.
They advised the ticket had been bought and then sold on by an individual who met the criteria to buy. Also said the person had seven other accounts linked to them and they had removed all their accounts. They were aware of the use of bots to grab tickets as soon as they are put on sale.
I had suggested that the club had sold on directly to a tout site but they said they do not do that for seats returned on Ticket Exchange.
I know people reading this may be skeptical about that explanation but I can only pass on what was said.
The person I spoke to added it was important that fans could trust Ticket Exchange and know the club are clamping down on any individuals who sell to tout sites.
I mentioned the BBC article and questioned why City had declined to comment. I wasn’t surprised the reply was it wasn’t within the remit of the person I was speaking to but he did say he would feed that back to those who make those decisions.
So without any proof the club deleted accounts of seven people who may have had no knowledge of what the other person did?Had a phone call from City today in response to me reporting my son’s derby ticket being sold on a to a tout site. Had a decent conversation with them.
They advised the ticket had been bought and then sold on by an individual who met the criteria to buy. Also said the person had seven other accounts linked to them and they had removed all their accounts. They were aware of the use of bots to grab tickets as soon as they are put on sale.
I had suggested that the club had sold on directly to a tout site but they said they do not do that for seats returned on Ticket Exchange.
I know people reading this may be skeptical about that explanation but I can only pass on what was said.
The person I spoke to added it was important that fans could trust Ticket Exchange and know the club are clamping down on any individuals who sell to tout sites.
I mentioned the BBC article and questioned why City had declined to comment. I wasn’t surprised the reply was it wasn’t within the remit of the person I was speaking to but he did say he would feed that back to those who make those decisions.
Did they say how it was possible for a fan / tout to buy it and then sell it on?Had a phone call from City today in response to me reporting my son’s derby ticket being sold on a to a tout site. Had a decent conversation with them.
They advised the ticket had been bought and then sold on by an individual who met the criteria to buy. Also said the person had seven other accounts linked to them and they had removed all their accounts. They were aware of the use of bots to grab tickets as soon as they are put on sale.
I had suggested that the club had sold on directly to a tout site but they said they do not do that for seats returned on Ticket Exchange.
I know people reading this may be skeptical about that explanation but I can only pass on what was said.
The person I spoke to added it was important that fans could trust Ticket Exchange and know the club are clamping down on any individuals who sell to tout sites.
I mentioned the BBC article and questioned why City had declined to comment. I wasn’t surprised the reply was it wasn’t within the remit of the person I was speaking to but he did say he would feed that back to those who make those decisions.
People claiming that City are clamping down on the (illegal) unauthorised sale of tickets, while stuffing tickets on illegal and unauthorised sites need to think this through.You claimed that they went to hospitality when they were put on the exchange.
They dont ,they get put on the ticketing sites by City as proved by the last few posts on here.
I have been banging on about this for the last few seasons when others keep blaming the fans for selling them on.
City should hang their heads in shame for this abhorrent abuse of the ticketing system.
Well clearly they identified accounts linked to the culprit and felt they had enough proof to act.So without any proof the club deleted accounts of seven people who may have had no knowledge of what the other person did?
Sounds very unlikely.
I don't believe the story to be honest. It seems very judge dredd without proper investigation and too much details have been shared.ket had been bought and then sold on by an individual who met the criteria to buy. Also said the person had seven other accounts linked to them and they had removed all their accounts. They were aware of the use of bots to grab tickets as soon as they are put on sale.
I've not mentioned them being put on any unauthorised sites.People claiming that City are clamping down on the (illegal) unauthorised sale of tickets, while stuffing tickets on illegal and unauthorised sites need to think this through.
Personally I think the club should stop using any 'authorised' third-parties but I'd say it's ridiculous to think they're using unauthorised ones putting them at risk of potential criminal prosecution.
Yes, but at least City are open about their 'authorised' resellers. I'd prefer they didn't use these outlets but there are some on here ludicrously claiming City deliberately and regularly pass tickets directly onto unauthorised, touting websites.I've not mentioned them being put on any unauthorised sites.
City put them out to their ticketing partners, it's what happens to them then, is anyones guess.
I don’t think it’s a rumour it’s advertised on the City website!It's the worlds worst kept secret we have been complaining about it for a few seasons as have other sides. It didn't need any investigative journalist "Getting all shoestring", just a credit card no fuss made.
If the rumour is true about off site eating and the restaurant owned by Pep and his mates I would be more disappointed.