The Labour Government

Well said, Gaylord. We are massively in the shit as a nation and are going to have to pay more tax to try and sort it out, as a civilised society should do.

Am I prepared to pay more tax to try and sort it? Absolutely. Honestly more than happy to.

Whilst I agree with the theory, I think in practice it would just whip an already angry country into a frenzy. The hatred of immigrants would intensify for certain.

I’m not sure what the answers are.
 
People with a few quid might have to eat out a bit less and cut back on the foreign holidays. Doesn’t have to be catastrophic for the economy. Ot the end of the world for them.

And it simply needs to happen.
Talking with the wife today about how meals at our local pub has risen by around 25% in the last 18 months, we used to go about two or three times a month now we are lucky if it’s one, whether they need to raise those prices that much I don’t know. A holiday for 3 of us is in school holidays is a minimum of £3k for anything semi decent. If as some say we put 5p on income tax well lots of stuff will stop and the pub sector would collapse I reckon. I’ll pay 2p extra as long as all those bonuses for CEOs etc of failed sectors like water etc stop until they are brought up to spec. Get rid of the daft PFI system in the NHS and other public sectors where companies charge £5 for a tongue depressor when it should be 5p. Stop wasting money in the MOD on shit that is never actually used ( saw that 25 years ago and it still happens)hold accountable management in the public sector on blowing budgets on crap that never works (saw loads in the fire service). There lots of money wasted, give MPs a proper salary but they aren’t allowed secondary employment until they leave office to stop corruption.
 
Whilst I agree with the theory, I think in practice it would just whip an already angry country into a frenzy. The hatred of immigrants would intensify for certain.

I’m not sure what the answers are.
The immigration issue needs to be neutralised as best as possible. Think the system needs knocking down and rebuilding, and if that means a small loss of liberty for people trying to get in, in order to make it far more efficient, then that has to be a fair price for potentially substantially more social cohesion imo.

This situation needs to be managed carefully. We can’t completely ignore the concerns of so many people.
 
Whilst I agree with the theory, I think in practice it would just whip an already angry country into a frenzy. The hatred of immigrants would intensify for certain.

I’m not sure what the answers are.
Maybe so but I don't think people would flinch at the prospect of clear intent to economic recovery.
Having said that they'll also have to seriously address the immigration expenditure.
Otherwise we'll they'll still be robbing Peter... with absolutely no economic benefit to show for any rises.
 
The immigration issue needs to be neutralised as best as possible. Think the system needs knocking down and rebuilding, and if that means a small loss of liberty for people trying to get in, in order to make it far more efficient, then that has to be a fair price for potentially substantially more social cohesion imo.

This situation needs to be managed carefully. We can’t completely ignore the concerns of so many people.

It’s a fine balance. When you have political parties just trying to point score I just can’t see anything changing on that front.

I actually read a quote today from the shadow Home Secretary

“Illegal imigrants should not be in hotels”

Am I mistaken to think it was his party that put them in hotels ?

I can’t see people swallowing big tax rises without radical changes to a lot of things.
 
Maybe so but I don't think people would flinch at the prospect of clear intent to economic recovery.
Having said that they'll also have to seriously address the immigration expenditure.
Otherwise we'll they'll still be robbing Peter... with absolutely no economic benefit to show for any rises.

I think one of the problems is that governments tend to fluff economic recovery by wasting money. Local councils too.
 
I think one of the problems is that governments tend to fluff economic recovery by wasting money. Local councils too.
They often have done that's for sure. But now it's down to the sitting government to attempt to gain a grip on it.
It won't make them popular in some quarters but if left we'll be beyond fucked. I believe we all have a responsibility to leave the country with a future.
 
I think one of the problems is that governments tend to fluff economic recovery by wasting money. Local councils too.
A common argument and, whilst certainly true in some areas, it suggests, as is often the case, that the private sector is so much better. Frankly, it isn’t, it’s just that know nothing politicians are, mostly, absolutely fucking useless at anything…
 
They should bite the bullet and whack 5% on income tax across the board and restore the previous NI threshold.
We all know we need to pay more to sort this shit out. The longer we leave it the worse it's going to get.
They should be straight about it. It needs to be done. Manifesto pledges or not .

We absolutely do need to pay more but does anyone have any faith whatsoever in any party to spend the money wisely?

I know I don’t.
 
See the Labour Party have been handed another crock of shite to sort out this morning


The Nuclear Veterans association ..... troops who were used as guinea pigs during nuclear bomb testing.

What exactly have the Tories been doing for the last 15 years?

What did Blair do about it?

Brown?

Wilson?

Callaghan?

Would be easier and fairer to just accept it should never have happened full stop instead of trying to blame a particular government for something that started in 1951!
 
Since when was the budget held in November? I swear it used to be in March!

I’m sure the uncertainty of that isn’t helping people make decisions re Christmas n what not.

I know it’s gotta be held sometime but I just don’t see what was wrong with having it in March. Unless I’m imagining it was held in March previously!!
 
Since when was the budget held in November? I swear it used to be in March!

I’m sure the uncertainty of that isn’t helping people make decisions re Christmas n what not.

I know it’s gotta be held sometime but I just don’t see what was wrong with having it in March. Unless I’m imagining it was held in March previously!!
They’ve been doing two a year for years mate.
 
Since when was the budget held in November? I swear it used to be in March!

I’m sure the uncertainty of that isn’t helping people make decisions re Christmas n what not.

I know it’s gotta be held sometime but I just don’t see what was wrong with having it in March. Unless I’m imagining it was held in March previously!!
Recent times, the main time for the Budget was in the Autumn, October/November time, followed by a spring statement. I think it got a bit murky under Johnson who seemed to use the spring statement as a second budget, which Reeves reversed and returned to a single budget in Autumn.
 
Im not going round in circles while you give me examples of well to do pensioners. The state pension only is not a lot of money to live on. That is my view so anyone going on about the triple lock can do one until the state pension is more in line with other decent paying countries.
That is where I stand and where I will stay, if anyone wants to come up with ideas of how to take a bit more off the wealthy then fair enough.

@Blue Maverick rightly states defining what a well to do pensioner is ain't easy. For some reason a few posters seem to have a downer on the temerity of old folk to not be living off bread and water and daring not to pop their clogs for our benefit. :-)
Or facts!

You're right the state pension should be higher, but that requires an uplift in taxes, that no one wants.

I would increase VAT on anything over £400ish. I would increase VAT on excessive energy use (a distant friend has an indoor swimming pool that he heats all winter. £10000 was his bill last year but still only paid 4% VAT on it). I would reduce VAT on "normal use" fuel to 3%.

I'm not a pensioner yet, but I genuinely won't need the state pension as I paid at least 9% into a company scheme from the age of 18. If I live an average time I will get about £220 000 from the state. I would advocate a voluntary buy out by the state. Lets say 50% up front but then no further call on the state if you take it. The long term liability to the state disappears.

I would have people who retire early as I did continue to pay NI whilst they are in pension drawdown.

I would remove stamp duty for pensioners downsizing(figures to be determined)

A one off wealth tax over £10m may work. There was already effectively a wealth tax on pensions when someone turned 75 and no one blinked an eye at that. That was removed along with the LTA on pensions. I know someone who has a very good pension fund benefitted by £750000 at the stroke of Jeremy Hunt's pen when the LTA was removed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top