All things AI.

I used ChatGPT for the first time yesterday. On the one hand it was fantastic, as it saved me from a significant amount of work trying to develop fourballs for a week long golf tournament (notwithstanding it produced errors in its first few tries). On the other hand, the last time I organised a trip I did the same thing in excel, and it took some serious grey cell work on my part pulling it all together and getting it to work, which I won’t have to do again. No doubt there’s a significant downside to not engaging the grey cells moving forward.
 
Brightwell’s left peg said:
I used ChatGPT for the first time yesterday. On the one hand it was fantastic, as it saved me from a significant amount of work trying to develop fourballs for a week long golf tournament (notwithstanding it produced errors in its first few tries). On the other hand, the last time I organised a trip I did the same thing in excel, and it took some serious grey cell work on my part pulling it all together and getting it to work, which I won’t have to do again. No doubt there’s a significant downside to not engaging the grey cells moving forward.
Click to expand...

Having to check its work is counterproductive.
 
Another one that had me really looking closely! Knowing that the actual film is in production, I had to question whether this was real or not, at first.

I had to freeze frame at 'Evil-Lyn' for confirmation on the second watch!



To think this is done on the cheap side and the light year jump in... 6 months (?) is mindblowing.

Hollywood's time is almost over.
 
Bigga said:
Another one that had me really looking closely! Knowing that the actual film is in production, I had to question whether this was real or not, at first.

I had to freeze frame at 'Evil-Lyn' for confirmation on the second watch!



To think this is done on the cheap side and the light year jump in... 6 months (?) is mindblowing.

Hollywood's time is almost over.
Click to expand...

The top actors will still get work, they have something computers can’t replicate and probably never will. People want to see a performer challenged by a role and also how their career has progressed over time. AI makes it too simple and removes this background context behind a performance.

AI actors look dead behind the eyes and you see repetition in facial expressions and body movements similar to animated characters. AI also struggles to replicate interaction between multiple actors that you get in the best movies. I don’t think anyone even knows what that is so trying to do it mathematically would be impossible. It’s a mix of timing and uniqueness. Take that chandelier scene in Only Fools and Horses, the line “Brace yourself Rodney, brace yourself” set up the punchline perfectly, but it was an ad-lib by David Jason because Nicholas Lyndhurst was about to crack up with laughter.
 
just seen an AI video on twitter, street interviews with Labour supporters - it looks close to being real - many saying they welcome illegals, welcome gang rapes etc , all the comments underneath saying 'whats wrong with these people' 'these people are sick' and thousands of similar bot comments.

what a dark place the internet now is.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
The top actors will still get work, they have something computers can’t replicate and probably never will. People want to see a performer challenged by a role and also how their career has progressed over time. AI makes it too simple and removes this background context behind a performance.

AI actors look dead behind the eyes and you see repetition in facial expressions and body movements similar to animated characters. AI also struggles to replicate interaction between multiple actors that you get in the best movies. I don’t think anyone even knows what that is so trying to do it mathematically would be impossible. It’s a mix of timing and uniqueness. Take that chandelier scene in Only Fools and Horses, the line “Brace yourself Rodney, brace yourself” set up the punchline perfectly, but it was an ad-lib by David Jason because Nicholas Lyndhurst was about to crack up with laughter.
Click to expand...

I agree with that, but at the same time, nuanced roles don't get the big money. They're becoming niche as most young watchers don't care. I think that's the Internet age of engagement.

This AI pathway will grow in the action genre and that's where the big money is.

In my opinion.
 
Brightwell’s left peg said:
I used ChatGPT for the first time yesterday. On the one hand it was fantastic, as it saved me from a significant amount of work trying to develop fourballs for a week long golf tournament (notwithstanding it produced errors in its first few tries). On the other hand, the last time I organised a trip I did the same thing in excel, and it took some serious grey cell work on my part pulling it all together and getting it to work, which I won’t have to do again. No doubt there’s a significant downside to not engaging the grey cells moving forward.
Click to expand...

time.com

ChatGPT's Impact On Our Brains According to an MIT Study

The study, from MIT Lab scholars, measured the brain activity of subjects writing SAT essays with and without ChatGPT.
time.com time.com
 
Bigga said:
I agree with that, but at the same time, nuanced roles don't get the big money. They're becoming niche as most young watchers don't care. I think that's the Internet age of engagement.

This AI pathway will grow in the action genre and that's where the big money is.

In my opinion.
Click to expand...

The guys done the full album now of Get rich or Die tryin haha. Bringing soul back!

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top