Can he play left back ? Asking for some other mithering cnutBut he doesn't track back and doesn't want the ball ? So few touches of the ball, why does he play
They all moan and hate him, but only 1 touch = goal, City win 1.0 that will do me
Can he play left back ? Asking for some other mithering cnutBut he doesn't track back and doesn't want the ball ? So few touches of the ball, why does he play
They all moan and hate him, but only 1 touch = goal, City win 1.0 that will do me
Not missed any pens for us this season, but might be down to the fact that we haven't had any.Missed the penalty twice, keeper saved both ways. I see Cole Palmer getting ridiculed for scoring them like they don't count, but I wish we had the mentality to convert them post Yaya.
Nine in his last three games for Norway.Have I got this right, he's scored EIGHT goals for Norway in his last two games? I'd love Norway to qualify for the World Cup Finals for him, I think he'd set the tournament alight!
He’s just signed a ten year contract mate. He’s going nowhere!For God's Sake City dont
Flirt with RM regarding any Deal Ever.
I Take the point he will decide his own
Future However.
Copyright Rodney Marsh in the mid 70s.Fuck me, only used to get a slice of orange at Metrovics.
Goals per minutes played should be the measure, not goals per game. Then you would see Sergio move right up that list, above Kane, Shearer, Cole in the PL eraI believe the original ESPN question was along the lines of "Is Haaland already the Best PL Striker of All-Time".
The panel then scoffs at the stats and go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to try to discount the claim. Surely pure strikers are judged by the amount of goals they get? He's not the best footballer but that wasn't the question.
They ask "would you have prime Henry or prime Haaland?" We don't know what Haalands prime is yet.
But based on the crude table below, at roughly the same age of 25 he's well ahead of all the considered English league greats. Only Greaves is in the same ballpark
Then they claim that it's easier to score nowadays and players have more space. I would argue that playing against the packed defences and low blocks, Haaland has less space and less touches than those from the 90s during the so called Golden Era of defending.
I get it's difficult and so subjective to compare era's but to argue that 20 players are comparable is just laughable. But Strikers stats are pretty definitive as far as outfield players go
View attachment 171893
I know but contracts can be bought and I wouldn't trust RM 1 BitHe’s just signed a ten year contract mate. He’s going nowhere!
He missed 2 pens, or the goalie saved 2 pens b4 he scoredBut but the yellow ticket along the sky screen (out with mates otherwise wouldn’t bother) said HAALAAND MISSED PEN 6 MINS !!!!!! Then scored 3 , fk off Sky AND the rest of you
Anyone else think erling is starting to get a Manc accent when he speaks English.
He was brought up in Manchester he was a junior Blue
Anyone else think erling is starting to get a Manc accent when he speaks English.
Amateurish playground stuff spurred on by the host,the most irritating clown of the lot Le Buff suggested OSGOOD, Bernatov and Mark fuckin Hughes were superior !.At least Hutchison was being objective for a change.I believe the original ESPN question was along the lines of "Is Haaland already the Best PL Striker of All-Time".
The panel then scoffs at the stats and go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to try to discount the claim. Surely pure strikers are judged by the amount of goals they get? He's not the best footballer but that wasn't the question.
They ask "would you have prime Henry or prime Haaland?" We don't know what Haalands prime is yet.
But based on the crude table below, at roughly the same age of 25 he's well ahead of all the considered English league greats. Only Greaves is in the same ballpark
Then they claim that it's easier to score nowadays and players have more space. I would argue that playing against the packed defences and low blocks, Haaland has less space and less touches than those from the 90s during the so called Golden Era of defending.
I get it's difficult and so subjective to compare era's but to argue that 20 players are comparable is just laughable. But Strikers stats are pretty definitive as far as outfield players go
View attachment 171893