I've been reading the Bear Pit this morning (is that the same forum?) and that has the same tone of "No"
It's easy to look at his win percentage, or where we finished or how many goals we've conceded to dismiss him without any context.
Comments along the lines as "they managed to stay up and then finished 12th", to add context we had (on paper) one of the bottom 3 squads in the championship that first season, had 2 points from 10 games and were 12 points from safety by November. The 2nd half of the season we were the 7th best team in the division and managed to avoid relegation.
2nd season we were just outside of the playoffs come January, with a bit of a push in the transfer window we could have easily ended in the Po's, obviously hindsight is a wonderful thing, where the reality is Chancer had spent the money and we never stood a chance.
Now if Rangers have one of the worst squads in the SPL then expectations of mid-table at best is fair game, if however (as I suspect) they have one of the better squads then who knows.
I've also seen he's a Russell Martin clone, his football is nothing like Martin's possession based over playing football. Rohl likes to get the ball forward early to a fast front line.
I'm not suggesting he is the right man for Rangers and looking how this season has gone, whoever goes in is on a hiding to nothing, but for me he's not just an inferior lower league manager.
I mean you only haver to look at the other side of the city, is Brendan Rodgers a top tier manager? I know Leicester City fans don't think so.