President Trump

.db. said:
Which shouldn’t happen as it’s unlawful, but positive discrimination shouldn’t then happen as a result of that as it’s also unlawful.
Click to expand...
You’re right, is IS unlawful. So that puts to bed “white men can’t apply for jobs” or that white men have it harder.

Test it yourself, send out a dozen applications, 6 in the name of Hamid Yousef Baghdadi and 6 in the name of Sebastian Fitz-Henley and see which gets more replies.
 
SWP's back said:
You’re right, is IS unlawful. So that puts to bed “white men can’t apply for jobs” or that white men have it harder.

Test it yourself, send out a dozen applications, 6 in the name of Hamid Yousef Baghdadi and 6 in the name of Sebastian Fitz-Henley and see which gets more replies.
Click to expand...
Oh, those Fitz- Henleys I wouldn’t trust them with a barge pole.
 
AK45 said:
Yet he wasn't. If you can say one thing he said which was racist I will go with. He didn't. He was 100% right when it came to EDI and right on other things too, not everything but a lot of it.
Click to expand...
No he was virtually always wrong. Always a ****. Usually a racist and the world is better off without his vitriol although he didn’t deserve to die. Now who killed him is a whole other can of worms other than to say it most definitely didn’t happen as per the FBI’s explanation.
 
SWP's back said:
No he was virtually always wrong. Always a ****. Usually a racist and the world is better off without his vitriol although he didn’t deserve to die. Now who killed him is a whole other can of worms other than to say it most definitely didn’t happen as per the FBI’s explanation.
Click to expand...
Again somebody unable to provide one example of him being racist. Somebody who will have never watched any full clip, in context and took a snippet of one instead and made a new truth. He allowed others to express their opinions in an open forum. The last thing you'd label of a nazi as he is often called. Nazis silence people, similar to the treatment he received. Now I agree on the killer and not being convinced of what happened, as per his black FRIEND Candace Owens is unraveling.
 
roubaixtuesday said:
www.theguardian.com

Charlie Kirk in his own words: ‘prowling Blacks’ and ‘the great replacement strategy’

The far-right commentator didn’t pull his punches when discussing his bigoted views on current events
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Again, one lines from often quite lengthy debates. As I said in the first post, he also said it about the NBA and how there shouldn't be EDI to include more white players, because the standards will drop. Nobody has said that is racist to white people have they, because it is just obvious. That was his point with the pilot, if an airline was starting to employ other people based on their ethnicity rather than their skill, he would hope that the black pilot was the best person possible, rather than flying his plane to fill a quota. That was an exaggerated point to prove a point, but the point stands no matter which race or which way round the best person should get the job.

I will be honest, prior to his death I was unsure over him, liked some of what he said, disagreed with others but solely from short edited clips. The full clips of these debates are out there for people to educate themselves fully. I still don't agree with it all, but I know he isn't close to the many things the lunatic lefties level at him.
 
As an aside, I never comprehended before visiting the US just how ingrained racism is in the culture there, far different to the UK.

I can't readily read between the lines in the same way, but to US citizens, the various dogwhistles to white supremacy used by the far right in general and Charlie Kirk in particular are well understood, I think.

Kirk's more explicit racism is part of the increased willingness to bring out into the open what has been historically forbidden but understood.

You see the same in everyday behaviours in the UK these days, sadly.
 
roubaixtuesday said:
Racist one lines, which you asked for evidence of. You have it.
Click to expand...
But they aren't racist are they. Saying if he boarded a flight and the pilot was black he would think he hopes he's qualified? As a line that sounds racist, in the context of the whole conversation it is not is it. But you are proving the point, you aren't bothered about facts even when they are explained. You are magnifying one sentence around a lengthy debate. Every point I list are ignored so it is pointless, your mind is made up. I just challenged you to educate yourself.
 
AK45 said:
But they aren't racist are they. Saying if he boarded a flight and the pilot was black he would think he hopes he's qualified? As a line that sounds racist, in the context of the whole conversation it is not is it. But you are proving the point, you aren't bothered about facts even when they are explained. You are magnifying one sentence around a lengthy debate. Every point I list are ignored so it is pointless, your mind is made up. I just challenged you to educate yourself.
Click to expand...
It's racist because the only reason he's wondering if the pilot is qualified is because he's black. If the pilot wasn't black he wouldn't be questioning their competency therefore by definition it's racist. It's really very fucking simple. The extra "well this is the context blah blah blah" is just horseshit.
 
Last edited:
AK45 said:
Your example is obviously wrong and if them people were qualified then they of course should have been interviewed and appointed.

I do not agree with EDI in the slightest though. As you and the poster says, it should absolutely be the best person for the role. I have applied for jobs recently and to keep reading how certain people get an automatic interview is a piss take. They may not be remotely qualified and get to waste everybodys time with an interview. Of course there needs to be equal opportunities but ultimately the best person for the job should get it.

I work in education and if there is a learner who may require additional support, that support is given to level it out. You cannot then give an advantage to them dependent on the level of support provided, alterations are given to ensure they have the equal opportunity as others. EDI gives others an unfair advantage. Charlie Kirk got battered for his pilot comments, which he explained since but people did not want to hear it and he was 100% right. The same way he flipped it and said if the NBA included EDI and said a certain percentage of players had to be white, the standards would slip. It isn't rocket science.
Click to expand...
Charlie Kirk wasn't right with his pilot comments. We were led to believe he was an intelligent young man debating from a position of good faith; if that were the case, then he should have understood an airline or aviation agency would never hire a pilot based on the colour of their skin. It's a very demanding role that requires a rigourous skillset, moreover, you are beholden to hundreds of lives a week.

His "understanding" of DEI was flawed and deliberately reframed. My organisation wouldn't hire an electrical engineer based on the colour of their skin, a hospital wouldn't hire a surgeon based on the colour of their skin, a chambers wouldn't hire a barrister based on the colour of their skin, etc. That's not how DEI works. Any quotas that do exist within a DEI initiative are aimed at mostly menial roles. If Kirk was as smart as some on here thought, then he wouldn't have peddled the bullshit, unfounded concern of a black pilots being unqualified.

He was a professional antagonist who knew exactly what he was doing.
 
AK45 said:
Again somebody unable to provide one example of him being racist. Somebody who will have never watched any full clip, in context and took a snippet of one instead and made a new truth. He allowed others to express their opinions in an open forum. The last thing you'd label of a nazi as he is often called. Nazis silence people, similar to the treatment he received. Now I agree on the killer and not being convinced of what happened, as per his black FRIEND Candace Owens is unraveling.
Click to expand...

As I say, bloke was a ****.

Charlie Kirk's Documented Calls for Political Violence (2012-2024)



Direct Calls for Death and Public Executions:



* Called for President Biden to receive "the death penalty for his crimes against America" (July 2023)\^1

* "Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?" - suggested children should watch (2024)\^2

* Called for "Nuremberg-style trials for every gender-affirming clinic doctor" invoking Nazi war crimes imagery (April 2024)\^3



Calling for Lethal Force Against Migrants and Minorities:



* Advocated lethal force against migrants: "If you enter, we have lethal force, and we're willing to use it" and "You can start with firing next to them" (March 2024)\^4

* Advocated using whips against migrants, asking "Why is that controversial?"\^5

* Warned of "enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes" requiring armed response\^6

* Directed supporters: "Buy weapons. Buy ammo. If you go into a public place, bring a gun with you"\^7



Violent Anti-LGBTQ+ Statements:



* Said he "would've loved" if fathers "formed a line" to physically confront transgender athletes: "you're going to have to come through us"\^8

* Called transgender people "an abomination" and "a throbbing middle finger to God"\^9

* Advocated handling LGBTQ+ people "the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s" (era of criminalization and forced institutionalization)\^10



Extreme Anti-Black and Antisemitic Rhetoric:



* Called George Floyd a "scumbag"\^11

* Said Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a "huge mistake"\^12

* "If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he's qualified'"\^13

* Called Martin Luther King Jr. "awful" and "not a good person"\^14

* Claimed Jewish people control "not just the colleges; it's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it"\^15

* "The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country"\^16



Great Replacement Theory and White Supremacist Messaging:



* Promoted "Great Replacement" theory: "not a theory, it's a reality" - Democrats seek to "diminish and decrease white demographics in America"\^17

* SPLC documents Kirk warning that "native born Americans are being replaced by foreigners" and promising Trump will "liberate" the country from "the enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes"\^18



Celebrating and Normalizing Violence:



* Said gun deaths are "worth it" to preserve Second Amendment rights\^19

* Promoted Christian nationalist "Seven Mountain Mandate" ideology calling for theocratic takeover through "spiritual warfare"\^20



Targeting and Harassment Campaigns:



* Created "Professor Watchlists" that resulted in death threats, rape threats, and antisemitic harassment\^21

* Arizona State University President documented that Kirk's watchlist generated "antisemitic, anti-LGBTQ+ and misogynistic attacks on ASU faculty"\^22

* One professor resigned after "nearly a year of harassment by right-wing, white supremacist media outlets"\^23

* Maintained "School Board Watchlists" targeting local education officials\^24



January 6 Capitol Attack Organization:



* Organized "80+ buses full of patriots to D.C. to fight for this president"\^25

* Admitted receiving "500 emails a minute calling for a civil war" before January 6\^26

* Pleaded the Fifth over 70 times when questioned by House January 6 Committee\^27



Civil Rights Organizations' Classification as Extremist:



* Southern Poverty Law Center added Turning Point USA to official "Hate Map" as "antigovernment extremist group" (2024)\^28

* Anti-Defamation League documents Kirk's systematic antisemitic rhetoric\^29

* Academic research from Cambridge Core and Brookings Institution documents Kirk's rhetoric following established patterns of stochastic terrorism\^30



Documented Legal Consequences and Criminal Investigations:



* Federal Election Commission fined Kirk's organization $18,000 for campaign finance violations\^31

* Multiple universities paid settlements totaling tens of thousands of dollars after Kirk's "Professor Watchlist" resulted in documented death threats\^32

* Criminal charges filed in multiple states against TPUSA personnel for violent confrontations, including felony assault charges in Arizona\^33

* Yolo County District Attorney investigating coordinated attacks at UC Davis that could result in felony charges carrying up to three years in prison\^34



International Recognition as Extremist:



* Socialist Worker UK described his content as a "cesspit of far right lies, vile racism, transphobia"\^35

* CBC Canada documented his "combative style" as making him a "potent political force" in promoting extremist ideologies\^36

* Al Jazeera noted Kirk's "provocative style" as deliberately inflammatory political messaging\^37



General Violence Normalization:



* Regularly promoted false claims about 2020 election integrity leading to January 6\^38

* Systematic rhetoric describing Democratic governance as illegitimate\^39

* Network Contagion Research Institute documents Kirk's systematic provision of mainstream legitimacy to white nationalist figures\^40



Sources:



\^1 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...son-andor-given-death-penalty-crimes-against)



\^2 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...kirk-death-penalty-public-executions-1873073)



\^3 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...e-trial-every-gender-affirming-clinic-doctor)



\^4 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...igrants-southern-border-if-you-enter-we-have)



\^5 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...igrants-southern-border-if-you-enter-we-have)



\^6 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^7 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^8 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...goted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california)



\^9 [https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/...ning.com/p/we-must-not-posthumously-sanitize)



\^10 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...goted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california)



\^11 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl...s/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859)



\^12 [https://www.breezyscroll.com/world/...rld/the-us/charlie-kirk-controversial-takes/)



\^13 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl...s/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859)



\^14 [https://populartimelines.com/timeli...timeline/Charlie-Kirk/controversies-scandals)



\^15 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^16 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^17 [https://www.politifact.com/factchec...mented-immigrants-are-not-proof-of-a-scheme/)



\^18 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^19 [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/c...om/fact-check/charlie-kirk-gun-deaths-quote/)



\^20 [https://politicalresearch.org/strat...sa-increasingly-leaning-right-wing-christian)



\^21 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profe...://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist)



\^22 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^23 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profe...://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist)



\^24 [https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/...ning.com/p/we-must-not-posthumously-sanitize)



\^25 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...-insurrection-buses-washington-tweet-1560727)



\^26 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie\_Kirk](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk)



\^27 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...-fifth-asked-his-age-jan-6-committee-1768952)



\^28 [https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...lc-laughingstock-listing-turning-point-hate/)



\^29 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^30 [https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...-on-twitter/8BCBD1F909A861589D93F7124AFE1A7E)



\^31 [https://www.citizensforethics.org/n...point-action-fined-following-crew-complaint/)



\^32 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^33 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^34 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^35 [https://socialistworker.co.uk/comme...charlie-kkkirks-chickens-come-home-to-roost/)



\^36 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl.../world/charlie-kirk-death-reaction-1.7630652)



\^37 [https://time.com/7316280/charlie-ki...316280/charlie-kirk-dead-political-violence/)



\^38 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie\_Kirk](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk)



\^39 [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/...ul-rhetoric-connects-to-real-world-violence/)



\^40 [https://libcom.org/article/network-...ate-fight-political-infection-left-and-right)
 
SWP's back said:
As I say, bloke was a ****.

Charlie Kirk's Documented Calls for Political Violence (2012-2024)



Direct Calls for Death and Public Executions:



* Called for President Biden to receive "the death penalty for his crimes against America" (July 2023)\^1

* "Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?" - suggested children should watch (2024)\^2

* Called for "Nuremberg-style trials for every gender-affirming clinic doctor" invoking Nazi war crimes imagery (April 2024)\^3



Calling for Lethal Force Against Migrants and Minorities:



* Advocated lethal force against migrants: "If you enter, we have lethal force, and we're willing to use it" and "You can start with firing next to them" (March 2024)\^4

* Advocated using whips against migrants, asking "Why is that controversial?"\^5

* Warned of "enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes" requiring armed response\^6

* Directed supporters: "Buy weapons. Buy ammo. If you go into a public place, bring a gun with you"\^7



Violent Anti-LGBTQ+ Statements:



* Said he "would've loved" if fathers "formed a line" to physically confront transgender athletes: "you're going to have to come through us"\^8

* Called transgender people "an abomination" and "a throbbing middle finger to God"\^9

* Advocated handling LGBTQ+ people "the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s" (era of criminalization and forced institutionalization)\^10



Extreme Anti-Black and Antisemitic Rhetoric:



* Called George Floyd a "scumbag"\^11

* Said Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a "huge mistake"\^12

* "If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he's qualified'"\^13

* Called Martin Luther King Jr. "awful" and "not a good person"\^14

* Claimed Jewish people control "not just the colleges; it's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it"\^15

* "The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country"\^16



Great Replacement Theory and White Supremacist Messaging:



* Promoted "Great Replacement" theory: "not a theory, it's a reality" - Democrats seek to "diminish and decrease white demographics in America"\^17

* SPLC documents Kirk warning that "native born Americans are being replaced by foreigners" and promising Trump will "liberate" the country from "the enemy occupation of the foreigner hordes"\^18



Celebrating and Normalizing Violence:



* Said gun deaths are "worth it" to preserve Second Amendment rights\^19

* Promoted Christian nationalist "Seven Mountain Mandate" ideology calling for theocratic takeover through "spiritual warfare"\^20



Targeting and Harassment Campaigns:



* Created "Professor Watchlists" that resulted in death threats, rape threats, and antisemitic harassment\^21

* Arizona State University President documented that Kirk's watchlist generated "antisemitic, anti-LGBTQ+ and misogynistic attacks on ASU faculty"\^22

* One professor resigned after "nearly a year of harassment by right-wing, white supremacist media outlets"\^23

* Maintained "School Board Watchlists" targeting local education officials\^24



January 6 Capitol Attack Organization:



* Organized "80+ buses full of patriots to D.C. to fight for this president"\^25

* Admitted receiving "500 emails a minute calling for a civil war" before January 6\^26

* Pleaded the Fifth over 70 times when questioned by House January 6 Committee\^27



Civil Rights Organizations' Classification as Extremist:



* Southern Poverty Law Center added Turning Point USA to official "Hate Map" as "antigovernment extremist group" (2024)\^28

* Anti-Defamation League documents Kirk's systematic antisemitic rhetoric\^29

* Academic research from Cambridge Core and Brookings Institution documents Kirk's rhetoric following established patterns of stochastic terrorism\^30



Documented Legal Consequences and Criminal Investigations:



* Federal Election Commission fined Kirk's organization $18,000 for campaign finance violations\^31

* Multiple universities paid settlements totaling tens of thousands of dollars after Kirk's "Professor Watchlist" resulted in documented death threats\^32

* Criminal charges filed in multiple states against TPUSA personnel for violent confrontations, including felony assault charges in Arizona\^33

* Yolo County District Attorney investigating coordinated attacks at UC Davis that could result in felony charges carrying up to three years in prison\^34



International Recognition as Extremist:



* Socialist Worker UK described his content as a "cesspit of far right lies, vile racism, transphobia"\^35

* CBC Canada documented his "combative style" as making him a "potent political force" in promoting extremist ideologies\^36

* Al Jazeera noted Kirk's "provocative style" as deliberately inflammatory political messaging\^37



General Violence Normalization:



* Regularly promoted false claims about 2020 election integrity leading to January 6\^38

* Systematic rhetoric describing Democratic governance as illegitimate\^39

* Network Contagion Research Institute documents Kirk's systematic provision of mainstream legitimacy to white nationalist figures\^40



Sources:



\^1 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...son-andor-given-death-penalty-crimes-against)



\^2 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...kirk-death-penalty-public-executions-1873073)



\^3 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...e-trial-every-gender-affirming-clinic-doctor)



\^4 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...igrants-southern-border-if-you-enter-we-have)



\^5 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...igrants-southern-border-if-you-enter-we-have)



\^6 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^7 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^8 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...goted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california)



\^9 [https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/...ning.com/p/we-must-not-posthumously-sanitize)



\^10 [https://www.mediamatters.org/charli...goted-rhetoric-he-was-first-guest-california)



\^11 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl...s/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859)



\^12 [https://www.breezyscroll.com/world/...rld/the-us/charlie-kirk-controversial-takes/)



\^13 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl...s/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859)



\^14 [https://populartimelines.com/timeli...timeline/Charlie-Kirk/controversies-scandals)



\^15 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^16 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^17 [https://www.politifact.com/factchec...mented-immigrants-are-not-proof-of-a-scheme/)



\^18 [https://www.splcenter.org/resources...urning-point-usa-case-study-hard-right-2024/)



\^19 [https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/c...om/fact-check/charlie-kirk-gun-deaths-quote/)



\^20 [https://politicalresearch.org/strat...sa-increasingly-leaning-right-wing-christian)



\^21 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profe...://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist)



\^22 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^23 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profe...://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor_Watchlist)



\^24 [https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/...ning.com/p/we-must-not-posthumously-sanitize)



\^25 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...-insurrection-buses-washington-tweet-1560727)



\^26 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie\_Kirk](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk)



\^27 [https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-ki...-fifth-asked-his-age-jan-6-committee-1768952)



\^28 [https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...lc-laughingstock-listing-turning-point-hate/)



\^29 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^30 [https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...-on-twitter/8BCBD1F909A861589D93F7124AFE1A7E)



\^31 [https://www.citizensforethics.org/n...point-action-fined-following-crew-complaint/)



\^32 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^33 [https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...org/resources/backgrounder/turning-point-usa)



\^34 [https://www.statepress.com/article/...icle/2023/11/turning-point-response-overview)



\^35 [https://socialistworker.co.uk/comme...charlie-kkkirks-chickens-come-home-to-roost/)



\^36 [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charl.../world/charlie-kirk-death-reaction-1.7630652)



\^37 [https://time.com/7316280/charlie-ki...316280/charlie-kirk-dead-political-violence/)



\^38 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie\_Kirk](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk)



\^39 [https://www.brookings.edu/articles/...ul-rhetoric-connects-to-real-world-violence/)



\^40 [https://libcom.org/article/network-...ate-fight-political-infection-left-and-right)
Click to expand...
I think he was just misunderstood!!
 
AK45 said:
But they aren't racist are they. Saying if he boarded a flight and the pilot was black he would think he hopes he's qualified? As a line that sounds racist, in the context of the whole conversation it is not is it. But you are proving the point, you aren't bothered about facts even when they are explained. You are magnifying one sentence around a lengthy debate. Every point I list are ignored so it is pointless, your mind is made up. I just challenged you to educate yourself.
Click to expand...
It is 100 percent racist if you know anything about how pilots qualify to fly airplanes, which I do, but apparently you and Charlie Kirk don’t. Using it as “an example” is precisely what makes it racist, not to mention inconceivably stupid.

Of course it’s a lengthy debate — read “The Diversity Bonus”, which is a scientific analysis of jobs that benefit from programs like AA or diversity pursuits and those that don’t. Here’s a hint for you and Charlie — airline pilot isn’t one of them because of the rigorousness of the qualification standards.

Your point isn’t ignored, it is considered and rejected. I am so motherfucking goddamn tired of the moaning when someone rejects an idea or argument — oh, woe is you, you’re so put upon. Come up with better fucking arguments if you want people to listen.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top