Earlyriser
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Feb 2025
- Messages
- 924
- Team supported
- Manchester City
They should do a complete investigation into his dealings in ' Pitch at The Palace'
He was innocent…
Rogues.If there was a rouges gallery of humans who’ve really fucked things up, (the Prince now known simply as) Andy and Stevie G would each be vying for top spot.
He is a perfect advert for why a hereditary system is utterly flawed.
Horrible ****.
Rouges’Rogues.
Now I’m further confused.Rouges’
Or probably the fact the government were going to look at the finances of all royal properties and not just AndrewsGood riddance, I suspect the legal challenge mounting from the Republic group may have sped this up.
His mum is culpable for turning Andrew into a spoiled, selfish, greedy, despicable brat.![]()
Andrew stripped of Prince title and will move out of Royal Lodge
He will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor - Buckingham Palace says "these censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him".www.bbc.com
I don't see why Charlie is happy to pay for his new gaff. I can only assume it's out of love for his mum.
Disgusting comment.His mum is culpable for turning Andrew into a spoiled, selfish, greedy, despicable brat.
In what way?Disgusting comment.
Hopefully they still intend to, should let Joe n Josephine public in on such findings n'all, like they do with the Sovereign Grant (Civil List in old money)Or probably the fact the government were going to look at the finances of all royal properties and not just Andrews
That there Cameron {dave} guy, during his stint as head of government, pulled down the financial transparency lens of all The Firm's wheelings n dealings.
David Cameron, while prime minister, decided to change the way the monarchy was funded by taxpayers.
As part of this change, Cameron, a self-described “passionate monarchist”, deliberately prevented the regular publication of how much public money Andrew and the other Windsors received.
Cameron decried the "painful annual discussion on every aspect of royal expenditure, accompanied by a tabloid-led debate about whether individual members of the family were ‘good value for money’”.