Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
They should do a complete investigation into his dealings in ' Pitch at The Palace'
 
2 down 2 to go.
'Her sister Beatrice travelled to Saudi Arabia to attend the Future Investment Initiative event in Riyadh.
While the princess isn't a working royal, she most likely attended on behalf of Afiniti, where she is Vice President of Partnerships & Strategy. With respect what the .... does she know about that.
The only investment she is after concerns her mother and father.
Despite not being a working royal she still gets a Grace and Favour residence.
Finally why don't her daughters offer Fergie accommodation in their properties? That's what would happen in all normal families when a mother is 'homeless'
 

I don't see why Charlie is happy to pay for his new gaff. I can only assume it's out of love for his mum.
His mum is culpable for turning Andrew into a spoiled, selfish, greedy, despicable brat.
 
Disgusting comment.
In what way?
I'd say that sums the relationship up completely.
I respected our queen until she paid hush money to protect that ****.
I understand mothers want to deny their sons are wrong uns, but to use our money to shush her up was unforgivable, and she will always be remembered for that.
She should have disowned him, or said nothing.
Instead she took the piss.
The royal family are a fucking joke.
 
Or probably the fact the government were going to look at the finances of all royal properties and not just Andrews
Hopefully they still intend to, should let Joe n Josephine public in on such findings n'all, like they do with the Sovereign Grant (Civil List in old money)

That there Cameron {dave} guy, during his stint as head of government, pulled down the financial transparency lens of all The Firm's wheelings n dealings.

David Cameron, while prime minister, decided to change the way the monarchy was funded by taxpayers.

As part of this change, Cameron, a self-described “passionate monarchist”, deliberately prevented the regular publication of how much public money Andrew and the other Windsors received.

Cameron decried the "painful annual discussion on every aspect of royal expenditure, accompanied by a tabloid-led debate about whether individual members of the family were ‘good value for money’”.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top