LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
No mate, I’d posted on yours earlier but for some reason your quote stuck. Apologies.Is that meant for me mate? Think I was copied in incorrectly there
No mate, I’d posted on yours earlier but for some reason your quote stuck. Apologies.Is that meant for me mate? Think I was copied in incorrectly there
Plus chronic underfunding of the BTP which has hindered safety and security.Just a quick reminder that over 14 years the then Govt allowed the various rail operators to cut station staff to the bone and actively campaigned against trains having guards and on board staff all in pursuit of allowing their mates operating the system to milk even more profit out of the system
Plus chronic underfunding of the BTP which has hindered safety and security.
In my region there are only 10 officers with 2 delegates per shift.
In Lincolnshire there are literally 2.
Human Swiss Army knife. Probably doing the hot food before cleaning the bogsNailed it.
Profit over safety.
I was hoping GBR would change that attitude. However they've decided to 'keep the experts'. Who all happen to be the shysters who worked for the private firms so they only think one way.
Bit suspicious some of the old TOC owners have created a railway staff agency to cover roles.
He followed their established orotocoljust reading on bbc news that the train driver was ex military, sounds like he reacted probably quicker and more effectively than most in alerting the police and diverting the train quickly, possibly saved several lives this bloke.
I have never understood why there is a separate police force anyway. It makes a mockery of those signs if you see anything suspicious report it to the BTP. If it is so thinly spread the suspicious person will have long since gone.Plus chronic underfunding of the BTP which has hindered safety and security.
In my region there are only 10 officers with 2 delegates per shift.
In Lincolnshire there are literally 2.
The Tories cut their budget and Schapps decided they would be replaced by normal plod. Then changed his mind but kept the budget cuts.I have never understood why there is a separate police force anyway. It makes a mockery of those signs if you see anything suspicious report it to the BTP. If it is so thinly spread the suspicious person will have long since gone.
The reason that a terrorist charge needs to be investigated and charged correctly is because the sentencing guidelines are often higher upon conviction, and post-release requirements ensure that such criminals are often more closely monitored. I think this is why people are concerned that the full facts are established and made transparent, even if it does happen to be a couple of nutters with knives attempting to murder numerous innocent people. It's not always about left and right, it's often concerned citizens hoping that knife wielding maniacs receiving substantial appropriate sentences. Remember, many folk have already lost trust in the police and CPS precisely because of previous crimes being under-charged.
Yes, apologies. I should have clarified; I wasn't having a go (far from it) at how long it took for the train to be stopped, merely the hell those passengers and train staff must have gone through in those 5 minutes.The security protocol for what we call a MTA is get the train to a station where Armed police can attend safely. It's better than dropping anchor in the middle of nowhere. The train the incident occured on has good cab security with thick metal doors that can only be opened by the driver/guard.
As you say it must have been the slowest 5 minutes of the passengers lives.
I didn't read it as if you we're having a go Macca.Yes, apologies. I should have clarified; I wasn't having a go (far from it) at how long it took for the train to be stopped, merely the hell those passengers and train staff must have gone through in those 5 minutes.
I was knifed several times many years ago. It was an horrendous experience and it only lasted about 2 minutes. I can only imagine the sheer horror for those last night, but I do have an inkling.
You are completely helpless against a knife. And you are aware of that fact every second while the attack continues.
You called it! Like moths to a flame!Ha, I was going to say that but good luck with onslaught you’ll receive. I just came home for a night from hunt camp, leaving early in the morning. I’ll leave you to it
The poster to whom I replied brought up the issue of guns, not me.Terrible news. Must have been terrifying.
Oh and can the yank gun nuts start their own thread where they can talk about polishing their massive guns with their tiny cocks. No need for it in here at all.
Gun ownership doesn’t require “legitimacy” or to “reinforce widespread gun ownership” in the USA, it’s a protected RIGHT…which you know, of course…inter alia!The notion of ‘good guys’ battling against ‘bad guys’ having so much cultural currency is probably the main reason that gun deaths are so prolific in the States because it legitimises and reinforces widespread gun ownership, and provides a simplistic and utterly flawed solution to a complex problem.
It serves as a specious justification for a system around gun ownership that causes widespread misery and fear - and ultimately enables (inter alia) school shootings to take place more readily.
Why make the odds even or require close proximity? They say “Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight” for a reason, and it’s not to compare close combat knife fighting skills!Indeed.
We should adapt your mantra to...
"The only thing would stop a bad guy with a knife is a good guy with a knife"...
You have yourself just posted a distinction ffs! One is concomitant of the other. And they are therefore wholly distinct.Please explain why there is.
All data requires analysis to understand a trend. That analysis is done with statistics.
For example. The temperature of the surface of the earth has risen over recent years. That's a fact, which we know through statistics.
Likewise, nothing can be reliably known about overall levels of knife crime without statistical analysis. Anything else is nothing more than personal opinion.
I choose not to believe these statistics as representing the picture as I see it. Don’t do this often, but I’m doing it here. There is absolutely no way knife crime isn’t more significantly on the rise than in that graph. The numbers are wrong.