Stephen Yaxley-Lennon

[We've got Guardiola]

Oh yeah, they’ve definitely taken a special interest in him, that is for certain.

Why wouldn't they take a special interest in him? He was responsible for fueling riots last year and has obviously broken the law on many occasions plus he arranges mass events where there is always trouble. He is backed by somebody who has an extreme level of power who has said that there will be a civil war in the UK. This obviously trends towards the potential for far-right extremism and yes even terrorism.

All of this is nonsense, he was stopped because of who he is yes but ask yourself who is he? The Police were doing their job. He had a choice to not give them information and avoid trouble but he chose the opposite as is his right. The Police then chose to arrest him and the CPS charged him with a minor offence (hence Magistrates court) as is their right.

He has then been vindicated of that by a system that works and has protected him from whatever rightly or wrongly the Police or CPS decided to do. The irony is that he has only ever attacked this system and most notably whenever he does get convicted of actually breaking the law (the last time by a jury of 12 people) he calls out that system as bent.

 

[We've got Guardiola]

Oh yeah, they’ve definitely taken a special interest in him, that is for certain.

Here is another example of why. This is from a Tommy Robinson ally Ant Middleton who is exiled in Dubai.

What does he mean by "arm yourselves" ? Should these people not be watched very carefully?

Far-right extremism is becoming a much bigger problem than Islamist extremism.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

he arranges mass events where there is always trouble.

Absolutely nonsense. Let’s lock him up for organising protests!

 

[We've got Guardiola]

Absolutely nonsense. Let’s lock him up for organising protests!

Arranging a protest is fine but we know full well what the intention of those protests are as we saw after Southport. It's to fuel a narrative towards anarchy and anti-government sentiment which can move towards violence.

It's the same with the Palestine protests which indeed are for Palestine but also partly argue for a change of government and governmental system. Palestine Action was proscribed for that reason, because it was willing to use criminal means to try and enact something political.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Here is another example of why. This is from a Tommy Robinson ally Ant Middleton who is exiled in Dubai.

What does he mean by "arm yourselves" ? Should these people not be watched very carefully?

Far-right extremism is becoming a much bigger problem than Islamist extremism.

I’m not really arsed about what your political views are. I just don’t agree with the government and police targeting people they don’t like. It’s wrong and if you don’t think it is then that is fair enough.

 

[We've got Guardiola]

I’m not really arsed about what your political views are. I just don’t agree with the government and police targeting people they don’t like. It’s wrong and if you don’t think it is then that is fair enough.

My whole point though is they don't 'not like' Robinson, you're trying to say that the government or Police are trying to silence some innocent nobody journalist because of his views. This is quite obviously false.

If Muslims were arranging similar protests which then led to violent riots then the Robinson lot would want them monitored, arrested and probably put in prison so why should he be treated differently?

He's a target because he made himself a target. He makes enough money to afford a £250k Bentley Bentayga through making himself a target.....

 

[dave_blue12]

Here is another example of why. This is from a Tommy Robinson ally Ant Middleton who is exiled in Dubai.

What does he mean by "arm yourselves" ? Should these people not be watched very carefully?

Far-right extremism is becoming a much bigger problem than Islamist extremism.

Incitement in plain sight.

Personally I think the authorities are way too lenient on these agents of a foreign power.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

My whole point though is they don't 'not like' Robinson, you're trying to say that the government or Police are trying to silence some innocent nobody journalist because of his views. This is quite obviously false.

If Muslims were arranging similar protests which then led to violent riots then the Robinson lot would want them monitored, arrested and probably put in prison so why should he be treated differently?

He's a target because he made himself a target. He makes enough money to afford a £250k Bentley Bentayga through making himself a target.....

Have you read anything about the verdict yesterday? The police officers said they can’t remember any of the questions they asked and didn’t have any clear reasons for stopping him.

Let’s get this straight, do you think he should have been locked up for this? By the sounds of it you want him locked up no matter what.

 

[youngbob]

Regardless of how you might feel about Robinson politically, I just don't understand why his followers can't see that they're being dragged along to do nothing but fill his coffers. Every single day on Twitter he's flogging merchandise or sharing a link to a GoFundMe. He was very obviously paid to go to some Israeli branch of McDonald's the other day, like he's some light entertainment YouTube influencer.

He was spreading all sorts of misinformation about the Huntingdon train stabbing on the night it happened, but now his fictional narrative hasn't been matched by the facts there's been no retraction. He just moves onto the next thing, or starts plugging his next documentary film, or starts complaining about being silenced and persecuted by the next enemy he's turning his fans against.

 

[117 M34]

Regardless of how you might feel about Farage politically, I just don't understand why his followers can't see that they're being dragged along to do nothing but fill his coffers. Every single day on Twitter he's flogging merchandise or sharing a link to a membership subscription. He was very obviously paid to go to some USA rally the other month, like he's some light entertainment YouTube influencer.

 

[We've got Guardiola]

Have you read anything about the verdict yesterday? The police officers said they can’t remember any of the questions they asked and didn’t have any clear reasons for stopping him.

Let’s get this straight, do you think he should have been locked up for this? By the sounds of it you want him locked up no matter what.

It's a fine line though isn't it with these types of people? I still would have stopped him given his history... And the fact that he had £13,000 in his boot.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

It's a fine line though isn't it with these types of people? I still would have stopped him given his history... And the fact that he had £13,000 in his boot.

I don’t think there’s an issue for stopping him, but that’s not the question I asked.

 

[Vic]

It's a fine line though isn't it with these types of people? I still would have stopped him given his history... And the fact that he had £13,000 in his boot.

Having heard an interview with a legal "reviewer" of how the draconian legislation can work and how it could be abused, I can understand the acquittal on failing to provide his phone info - but having stopped him, they discovered he was taking out more than the £10,000 cash limit - has he got away with that?

 

[Vic]

Has he said anything about the only Muslim immigrant involved in the train stabbings being the guard who tried to stop the assailant?

(I'm not sure whether it's confirmed either that he was Muslim or an immigrant - it only seems to be Muslim sites reporting it.)

 

[Marklr]

Has he said anything about the only Muslim immigrant involved in the train stabbings being the guard who tried to stop the assailant?

(I'm not sure whether it's confirmed either that he was Muslim or an immigrant - it only seems to be Muslim sites reporting it.)

Nah...he hates Muslims. That's what's made him famous...his hatred for others.

 

[lloydie]

Have you read anything about the verdict yesterday? The police officers said they can’t remember any of the questions they asked and didn’t have any clear reasons for stopping him.

Let’s get this straight, do you think he should have been locked up for this? By the sounds of it you want him locked up no matter what.

Had the police done their job properly, he would’ve probably been in prison by now.

 

[west didsblue]

It's a fine line though isn't it with these types of people? I still would have stopped him given his history... And the fact that he had £13,000 in his boot.

How did he get his foot in it?

 

[Bri1975]

 

[law74]

Depends where you’re stood, mate. From where I’m stood he doesn’t seem remotely smart.

Depends on how you define "smart"
He certainly wouldn't be academically gifted, but he was smart enough to realise year's ago that getting involved in punch ups at Kenilworth Road doesn't get money to buy powder, but stoking sectarian and racial tension can be a very profitable grift.
And he has fully monetised the grift.

 

[jazzy]

Having heard an interview with a legal "reviewer" of how the draconian legislation can work and how it could be abused, I can understand the acquittal on failing to provide his phone info - but having stopped him, they discovered he was taking out more than the £10,000 cash limit - has he got away with that?

You can take over £10k as long as it's been declared .