Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
RAWK still on lockdown I see
It's been like that for weeks (months?). You have to register to even browse the forum, never mind actually post on there.



I actually can see their point. Cut out the people who'd only go on there to take the piss. We should do the same on here. Look at here right now.....

1000022915.jpg


How many of those 2,166 "guests" are City fans?
 
It's been like that for weeks (months?). You have to register to even browse the forum, never mind actually post on there.



I actually can see their point. Cut out the people who'd only go on there to take the piss. We should do the same on here. Look at here right now.....

View attachment 174482


How many of those 2,166 "guests" are City fans?
eddie-murphy-trading-places.gif
 
It's been like that for weeks (months?). You have to register to even browse the forum, never mind actually post on there.



I actually can see their point. Cut out the people who'd only go on there to take the piss. We should do the same on here. Look at here right now.....

View attachment 174482


How many of those 2,166 "guests" are City fans?
At least it dilutes the FOC members……..




*JOKE!!!*

:-)
 
Tried to do a bit of digging to see if any team has won the English league title after losing 5 of their first 11 games. Weird that in today’s day and age that certain stats like that can’t be processed by AI or whatever. What I do remember is that when we lost 4 of our first 11 under Pellegrini in 2013/14 and went on to win the league, I think the last team to lose that many in the first 11 and go on to win the league was us in 1967/68. Anyway, turns out that we lost 5 of our first 11 in 67/68, not 4 (W5 D1 L5) so I suppose Liverpool are not quite out of it yet. Surely that game today has put a further dent in their confidence though.
 
Last edited:
Interesting that the media haven’t give them any grief over the obscene amount of money spent on players and the state of their football and especially their defence.

are they still maintaining the myth that no-one dribbles past Dick van Dyke? Spoke to my dad earlier he he was sure he could.

note; my Dad is 85 has one replacement hip and is waiting on a second lol
 
Slot giving a fair assessment of the game which makes a change from listening to Bingo whinge on about long grass and Bernardo.

Slot being found out , won the title with klopps side spent 500m and looks clueless
He’s their Pellegrini, but if Pellegrini was given half a billion quid and only allowed to spend it if he was off his fuckin nut on smack.
 
Tried to do a bit of digging to see if any team has won the English league title after losing 5 of their first 11 games. Weird that in today’s day and age that certain stats like that can’t be processed by AI or whatever. What I do remember is that when we lost 4 of our first 11 under Pellegrini in 2013/14 and went on to win the league, I think the last team to win that many in the first 11 and go on to win the league was us in 1967/68. Anyway, turns out that we lost 5 of our first 11 in 67/68, not 4 (W5 D1 L5) so I suppose Liverpool are not quite out of it yet. Surely that game today has put a further dent in their confidence though.
There were 22 teams in the First Division in those days, therefore, four more games for each club, so losing five of the first 11 had less impact on the overall season.
 
They didn’t look up for it. The short corner for our second goals summed it up

We played, played , played - they stood around looking for their knickers as Nico smashed it in!
 
are they still maintaining the myth that no-one dribbles past Dick van Dyke? Spoke to my dad earlier he he was sure he could.

note; my Dad is 85 has one replacement hip and is waiting on a second lol
That's hardly fair!! Could your dad not tie his boot laces together to give Van Dick a chance??
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top