Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,862
I'd abolish VAR in a heartbeat. It's added nothing for me and would rather take my chance with a ref's split second decision, good or bad.
For me the argument about VAR ended at the Cup final.
There was just no justification for not sending Henderson off for DOGSO when, 20 yards from his goal, he palmed the ball away from Haaland.
Assuming that the VAR official simply bottled such a game-changing decision because it was the FA cup final rather than anything more sinister, why would we want a system whereby on the biggest of occasions, they still don't get the biggest decisions right?
VAR was supposed to be limited to the game changing decisions in particular goals, red cards and penalties. What we have managed to achieve, somehow, is a system whereby in meaningless mid-table mid season fixtures they will happily chalk off a goal for being offside by a nasal hair, whereas the most blatant decisions don't get given in the very biggest matches.
So why bother?
I used to tire of dogshit decisions going against City, especially things like the penalty shouts in favour of the opposition which you just knew would never be given against Liverpool or United. But have we ended up with a system that is actually better? Seems to me we have swapped one set of bullshit rules for another.