PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Kinkybyname]

Now we are clicking I expect the negative media shite to resume.

 

[Legalamb777]

The standard is not “without doubt”. It is on a balance of probabilities. I wouldn’t jump to your conclusion

Why do I sense you are becoming increasingly pessimistic that the IC case could turn out bad for City.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The standard is not “without doubt”. It is on a balance of probabilities. I wouldn’t jump to your conclusion

Even the criminal standard of proof isn’t ‘without a doubt’ and nor has it ever been!

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Even the criminal standard of proof isn’t ‘without a doubt’ and nor has it ever been!

Can you take this to DMs or something. This thread isn't the right one for it.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Can you take this to DMs or something. This thread isn't the right one for it.

Given I was bolstering his point, you shot your bolt too soon mate.

If you’d waited long enough I’m sure you'd have found a more apposite post from this quarter to more effectively make your own point x

 

[wolviedinho]

Cleared!

Had a weird dream about this crap last night. Anyway, you can all stop fretting now and enjoy the holidays.

It was packaged up in a nice city folder,
It also did came with a selection of goodies lol.

-:)

 

[Keith Moon]

Sweden had a Lord Chancellor called Gun Hellsweek.

 

[WRicko]

Assume they haven’t finished for Christmas yet and this is the last possible week it can come out before the new year ?

 

[Gazza]

Assume they haven’t finished for Christmas yet and this is the last possible week it can come out before the new year ?

Which one?

 

[Damocles]

I've just seen another thread where a mod has stepped in and asked that it be kept on topic.
I presume they have given up with this one :-)

It's sort of becone its own thing. If you dig through the thread, the explanation has been given a few times.

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

@slbsn to the best you your knowledge are the two parties still not in receipt of the verdict?

 

[slbsn]

@slbsn to the best you your knowledge are the two parties still not in receipt of the verdict?

As of Friday, I don’t believe so. I think we are very close to calling it a day for 2025

 

[slbsn]

Why do I sense you are becoming increasingly pessimistic that the IC case could turn out bad for City.

No change. I’ve always felt sooner better for City but recognised an extended period before a decision may be unrelated to the detail of the case itself and could, for example, be sickness or conflicting diaries of the panelists. But we are really at the acceptable limits of the timetable. 1 year deliberation in a privately paid arbitration is pretty ridiculous

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

As of Friday, I don’t believe so. I think we are very close to calling it a day for 2025

This is not important Stefan....

What I want to know is if you sang at Fulham this season?

 

[slbsn]

This is not important Stefan....

What I want to know is if you sang at Fulham this season?

Briefly, before the fear of the greatest collapse in PL history distracted me

 

[Centurions]

Given I was bolstering his point, you shot your bolt too soon mate.

If you’d waited long enough I’m sure you'd have found a more apposite post from this quarter to more effectively make your own point x

Perhaps I've missed previous posts (given I haven't read them all but jumped straight to the last page :) ) but isn't that a bit of a whoosh moment for you? Or have I not woken up fully yet?

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

As of Friday, I don’t believe so. I think we are very close to calling it a day for 2025

Cheers Stefan

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Briefly, before the fear of the greatest collapse in PL history distracted me

They clearly heard your non angelic voice :-)

 

[Lord Blue]

No change. I’ve always felt sooner better for City but recognised an extended period before a decision may be unrelated to the detail of the case itself and could, for example, be sickness or conflicting diaries of the panelists. But we are really at the acceptable limits of the timetable. 1 year deliberation in a privately paid arbitration is pretty ridiculous

it would be a little monty python like but based on your last word, have there ever been cases where a panel has seen legal proceedings against it due to length of time or rising costs. i mean, have we basically paid for an argument rather than a solution, not really related but curious.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Perhaps I've missed previous posts (given I haven't read them all but jumped straight to the last page :) ) but isn't that a bit of a whoosh moment for you? Or have I not woken up fully yet?

Fuck knows. No reason why I can’t be as subject to a whoosh moment as the next poster!