Going on strike and then signing for the dippers swung it for himThe competition must have been poor.
Or was it only based on performances up until the end of May?
Going on strike and then signing for the dippers swung it for himThe competition must have been poor.
Or was it only based on performances up until the end of May?
Not the public apology City demanded, and received, from Carlos, though, is it?
Sadly that is a myth. The PL do not have any regulations insisting a club has Var screens.Are the PL also going to force them to comply with the VAR regulations with regards 'Big Screen Replays'?
Really? Oh that’s disappointing… I’ll have to edit a lot of posts:-(Sadly that is a myth. The PL do not have any regulations insisting a club has Var screens.
The high volume of Swedes who support the Dippers maybe?The competition must have been poor.
Or was it only based on performances up until the end of May?
Meanwhile a lifelong City fan, whose Dad played for us, who says every week how happy he is here, who is destroying all records, who signed a new 10 YEAR contract - gets press suggesting he's off, every week.So the media are now falling into line with Liverpool hoping to keep Salarrrrh... Telling us it was all just a molehill that's all been sorted with an apology .
Lol Salah is poison, I hope they do bury their heads in the sand about it.
Wow, I think I asked this question over the summer. And I dont think anyone came back with any suggestions - now there is!Isak comes on for Bradley. Isak then gets subbed off for Frimpong who himself then gets subbed off!
Has that happened before?
nor would a goal be given were Haaland to shove a defender in the back with both hands as he jumps!Not a chance we would get two red cards for us away at spurs
talking of frimpong, he looks a right twat with that headband and hairIsak comes on for Bradley. Isak then gets subbed off for Frimpong who himself then gets subbed off!
Has that happened before?
To be absolutely fair they were reds.Not a chance we would get two red cards for us away at spurs
It's a yellow all day long; no force, no intent, it's almost on the borderline of careless (no card) but it absolutely falls into reckless due to the injury/possibility of injury. Van Dyke's prolonged reaction and appeals to the ref (AND obviously the team he plays for) got Symonds the red yesterday.I just seen the red for symonds, seemed a bit harsh to me. I know everyone says it was but that was soft.
But, but, "the letter of the law", "the letter of the law"! Forget common sense ..... "the letter of the law". Some seem happy to simply accept how the "custodians" are ruining a once great game and encouraging cheating, over-reacting wankers (VVD).It's a yellow all day long; no force, no intent, it's almost on the borderline of careless (no card) but it absolutely falls into reckless due to the injury/possibility of injury. Van Dyke's prolonged reaction and appeals to the ref (AND obviously the team he plays for) got Symonds the red yesterday.
Yellow card all day long, we probably wouldn't even be awarded the free-kick (unless the opposition score and VAR are FORCED to look at it)