Longballutd
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 1,103
Can’t believe anyone wouldn’t agree that was a penalty. The league is a joke at this stage so many bent decisions going in favour of the same teams.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League Games | 20/21/22 March '26
- Thread starter MCFC1993
- Start date
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
In your world.Only me in the world or only me in a partisan blue world?
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
A good player but a fucking awful individualPenandes screaming for a goal despite seeing it at least a foot the other side
No we shall not agree. You know a large portion of every teams fan base is convinced beyond doubt that it is corrupt against there team and there team alone? You can't all be right.WWE (WWF in my day) yes, I used to enjoy it. As It is what it is, theatre. Football is nowhere near that yet, but shall we agree that VAR has been used in a way to favour the teams that earn the leagues/organisations the most money. It’s painfully obvious.
We are a bit of an anomaly as in we earn them money, but maybe not enough, and you always need a villain and we more than fit the narrative. Given our current predicament with the league (huge charges and court cases) we have noticeably been fucked more than usual by the use of VAR this season, which is of little surprise given the high profile legal battle.
If it's so obviously corrupt why watch? Do you like WWF as well?
Also, they let their mask slip earlier this season (which I’m surprised hasn’t benn scrutinised more by the general public). That Wirtz goal was allowed due to the newly introduced 5cm tolerance rule, that no one knew existed (mainly because it didn’t). Only for said rule to never be applied or mentioned since. So explain that?
So you genuinely think I'm the only person that thinks it wasn't a penalty? Your deluded.In your world.
Individual decisions are cherry picked all the time, the favourite one for us is the Rodri handball V Everton.Also, they let their mask slip earlier this season (which I’m surprised hasn’t benn scrutinised more by the general public). That Wirtz goal was allowed due to the newly introduced 5cm tolerance rule, that no one knew existed (mainly because it didn’t). Only for said rule to never be applied or mentioned since. So explain that?
That’s exactly how they do it,can’t wait to point to the spot for the red tops yet when it’s us I know immediately they won’t give it.Was pen all day, every day. But if the ref doesn’t give it, VAR will not overturn his decision. He gives that for the opposition and the same applies as in they won’t overturn his initial decision. Been going on all season. They can finally rig results with this loophole. It’s fucking disgusting.
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Maybe it's you that's deluded..every fucking time you seem to have an opposite view of what most people have..So you genuinely think I'm the only person that thinks it wasn't a penalty? Your deluded.
If we all said it was Friday you would disagree
I have an opposite view of what blinkered blues have in the same way I have an opposite view of what fans of other teams who always claim corruption have.Maybe it's you that's deluded..every fucking time you seem to have an opposite view of what most people have..
If we all said it was Friday you would disagree
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 14,826
- Team supported
- City
Had it on for 5 mins and had to turn it off due to the Rag love-in. I know they have to make them relevant to keep the Rags subscribing but that is nauseating and absolute shite for anybody else to listen to.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Never happened, shove not even shown at HT.
That's also how they work....we get a lucky decision for us or against whoever we're playing and it's all they'd talk about.
That's also how they work....we get a lucky decision for us or against whoever we're playing and it's all they'd talk about.
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
No you just say the opposite of what everyone else says to provoke a reaction..I have an opposite view of what blinkered blues have in the same way I have an opposite view of what fans of other teams who always claim corruption have.
Believe what you like..it was a push in the back..in the penalty area..therefore a penalty.
No we shall not agree. You know a large portion of every teams fan base is convinced beyond doubt that it is corrupt against there team and there team alone? You can't all be right.
That’s purely because the majority aren’t supports of the favoured few clubs. And the supporters of the favoured few clubs are so used to getting decisions going their way on the rare occasions they don’t, they call “bent”.
Difference is if you look at the volumes of penalties awarded for certain favoured clubs compared to those awarded against its a stark contrast. sendings off for the opposition compared to sendings off for the favoured teams. Again stark.
I’ll ask you this, how many times have we played against 10 men in the last few years compared to say Utd or Liverpool. It’s clearly against the law of averages. We’ve had plenty of situations where players should have walked against us, but there is always that “never quite bad enough” or “threshold” excuse used. I would love to know average VAR check times for incidents against us with potential goal scoring scenarios compared to the other big clubs, again I think the difference would tell the narrative.
Last edited:
pride in battle
Well-Known Member
Who give's a fuck about them ? Get champions league ? So what....2 games a week will really fuck then over :)
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Are you saying it wouldn’t be a foul anywhere else on the pitch?No we shall not agree. You know a large portion of every teams fan base is convinced beyond doubt that it is corrupt against there team and there team alone? You can't all be right.
I think I am, there was barely any contact and certainly not enough to put him off balance.Are you saying it wouldn’t be a foul anywhere else on the pitch?
Are you saying it wouldn’t be a foul anywhere else on the pitch?
Or in the Bournemouth box?
Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 24,020
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
Because it gives them much needed revenue, which keeps the club alive.Who give's a fuck about them ? Get champions league ? So what....2 games a week will really fuck then over :)
And I want them bleeding to death like a stuck pig.