The real quadrupleWe win a domestic treble and the charges collapse , end to a near perfect season.
Having a planned schedule with due dates for drafting, reviewing, updating, finalising and issuing of the reports is normal practice in many areas of business. Is it likely there would be an agreed schedule in this case?No, this is referring to whether IC themselves know their decision. Of course, their view would have been established in or shortly after the hearing (or in some cases/on some points on the papers). But this doesn't mean the written judgment has been finalised but has been held or selectively communicated. The parties have no information about the decision as Pannick states himself.
No.Having a planned schedule with due dates for drafting, reviewing, updating, finalising and issuing of the reports is normal practice in many areas of business. Is it likely there would be an agreed schedule in this case?
oh.some misunderstanding.
I realised that this place is a waste of time for me.
Maybe he realised it wasn’t…oh.
you are back.
what changed after you said this?..
I’m 6ft 3 so I hope they don’t bury me verticallySee you all next week
And the week after that
And then we'll all be six feet under
Nobody, and I mean nobody, gives a flying fuck about anything but the first team.Men’s team treble, women’s team double, youth team double. The biggest parade ever with a 115 banner on the three buses.
I do so youre wrong there.Nobody, and I mean nobody, gives a flying fuck about anything but the first team.
I do. The men's team will always mean the most to me but, like thousands of others, I enjoy watching the women's team, both on TV and at the joie. They've been great this season and the standard improves year on year. A great atmosphere, very few tourist fans, good value for money. As a club we should be very proud of the progress we've made, and the support we've given to driving the women's game forward in general.Nobody, and I mean nobody, gives a flying fuck about anything but the first team.
No legal tribunal worth its salt is going to paint themselves into a corner like that. Unlike people in a commercial settling, who are answerable to directors, shareholders and line managers the panel here are in control of the timetable and answerable to no one in that forum - if they were not, then chaos would ensue.Why?
Just your dick poking out....I’m 6ft 3 so I hope they don’t bury me vertically
Or maybe Pannick doesn't know for some reason, because its possible according to my learned friend ChatGPT (never wrong)No, this is referring to whether IC themselves know their decision. Of course, their view would have been established in or shortly after the hearing (or in some cases/on some points on the papers). But this doesn't mean the written judgment has been finalised but has been held or selectively communicated. The parties have no information about the decision as Pannick states himself.
There's definitely a few getting ants in their pants over yesterday's Twitter nonsense.
Chat GPT, as usual, only gives part of the picture. General administrative communications from the court would normally go directly to the sol, but I’d say in a tribunal hearing such as this, leading counsel on both sides are likely to be sent to judgment directly, along with the sol. This may have been discussed by the panel at the end of the hearing. Even if not the case, Pannick will be notified by the sol immediately upon receipt, most likely by it simply being forwarded.Or maybe Pannick doesn't know for some reason, because its possible according to my learned friend ChatGPT (never wrong)
A barrister is typically not the primary recipient of court communications. They are instructed to present the case but are not always the administrative contact. So it’s entirely possible for: an in-house company lawyer (legal counsel and employee) to be informed before the barrister (LP).
Keeping Pannick out of the loop sounds ridiculous but what if the PL have also cut out their barristers and the City and PL in house legal teams know the outcomes, hush hush, because its so bad for one of them ie the PL
What's a sol? I'd ask AI but it's wank.Chat GPT, as usual, only gives part of the picture. General administrative communications from the court would normally go directly to the sol, but I’d say in a tribunal hearing such as this, leading counsel on both sides are likely to be sent to judgment directly, along with the sol. This may have been discussed by the panel at the end of the hearing. Even if not the case, Pannick will be notified by the sol immediately upon receipt, most likely by it simply being forwarded.
Plus both parties are likely to be sent an embargoed version in advance of the judgment being handed down to check for any factual or typographical errors. Inconceivable leading counsel on both sides won’t be directly involved in that part of the process.
In short, Chat GPT is wank.
Also worth noting (and it’s sometimes too easy to get sucked into overanalysing these things) but Pannick’s response was as follows:
“We are still waiting. No date yet for a decision.“
It may be a throwaway comment, or very carefully chosen words, but the reference to the date of the decision rather than the decision itself may be worth noting.
It’s how a certain cohort refer to solicitors…What's a sol? I'd ask AI but it's wank.
Damn, I did consider that on very first viewing but it seemed unlikely from you.It’s how a certain cohort refer to solicitors…
My sol, your sol, this sol, that sol etc…
I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that, although financial shenanigans are way out of my wheelhouse.Standard Chartered, the highly controversial sponsor of LFC, is once again embroiled in a terrorism-related scandal. How long will it be before the Premier League and the The Football Association investigate this questionable commercial arrangement, in line with their corporate governance obligations?