I can name numerous just this season but 3 that have always concerned me :-In my opinion, there’s no corruption but there is bias. Mainly unconscious bias at that.
If you’re an official and you keep being told that despite City being great, the reason they’re great is due to cheating and you’re hearing this every time City are mentioned. Win, lose or draw.
As well as that, you’ve been brought up hearing how wonderful the redshirts are and how their history defines all that’s good about football. The press, of course, constantly reinforces this.
Maybe, just maybe, when there’s a debatable decision to be made, you err on the side of those history clubs and err against the oil money, no history, empty seat, 115 times cheats. Not my words to be clear where I stand, but the way it’s portrayed.
That’s my opinion about how all these, little and big, decisions can go the way they do.
1 Llorente CL quater final when the ref wasnt shown the definive angle on the handball, even Wio agreed and we were in the middle of the UEFA case.
2
Rashford/Ratface goal at the swamp which was probably the most ridiculous decision ive seen in 50 years watching football.
3
Henderson handball outside the area at Wembley which was debated as Haaland running away from goal, true but the LOTG were not applied and possibly last nights game would not have happened.
How many times have we seen them spend ages on a clear and obvios criteria where Haalands offside at Newcastle was one.
I accept all fans think their team is hard done to but when I can see clearly Guimaries right boot is far nearer to the six yard line than any part of Rubens frame jumping or stood still I am convinced the game is being manipulated by 3 men in a room 200 miles away.
Its incredible what weve won in the Pep era with these shenanigans going on in front of us.