ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,757
Yeah but I’m that hypothetical scenario nobody has been stabbed. If the coppers came round and the victim then says they’ve been stabbed, you’d expect they would give you a thorough check regardless of anything else. Not drag you a few yards and tell you you haven’t been stabbed.
Even if it were the case that his injury was in fact from falling after trying to flee, and it was true he was the assailant, this should not have changed how the police approached the situation. The assailant is injured and cant sit up. What is the injury? Broke a leg? A back? A neck?
The presumed " victims" weren't holding him down, they were holding him up. With blood in his mouth. Head injury perhaps? Should have been one of the first thoughts.
Its a major fuck up. no matter how you look at it.
Even if you assumed every claim by the killer and his family to be true.
Not really disagreeing with either of you here. I've said repeatedly on here that sticking cuffs and reading him his rights was needless (to say the least) at the time they did so and that more time should've been taken to assess the situation. So yeah, I'm kind of with you both here.
My argument was in response to the dog walker comment. The sad irony is that if a dog walker had found him and told the Police, the Police would've been starting from a place of neutrality and it would've been out of concern for a male lying injured. The Police were starting here on the back foot from a place of "he's a criminal, he's just fell trying to run away". It led to them not assessing the situation properly.