City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Make your mind up, I thought I was a rag ?

I am an accountant though :-)
I think I posted, in fact I did post, that you could either be a Gooner or a London rag, both in the same sentence you see, which means I'd not made up my mind, but I have decided you are not a fan of Manchester City.
Stick to accounting, as comprehension of simple sentences
 
In their eyes it does, its something that they are proud of , someone comparing what we have spent to their £50m Fizsmann money is frankly bizzare and embarssing

Sometimes you just have to admit that finishing in the top four without significant spending is a decent achievment , but you cant do that on here becuase people think you are wierd and any alternative views are shameful

Depends what you call significant spending, they have spent plenty when had too, they can do one with their moral high ground
 
Last edited:
I think I posted, in fact I did post, that you could either be a Gooner or a London rag, both in the same sentence you see, which means I'd not made up my mind, but I have decided you are not a fan of Manchester City.
Stick to accounting, as comprehension of simple sentences

Haven't you got a music association thread calling you?
 
Haven't you got a music association thread calling you?
Well there's more actual intelligent discourse then than reading your shit.

Try coming back with wages, the correlation between success and wages is far higher than the one between transfers and success.
That's if you can remember what real success is like.
Accountant in producing cooked lies shocker.
 
Well there's more actual intelligent discourse then than reading your shit.

Try coming back with wages, the correlation between success and wages is far higher than the one between transfers and success.
That's if you can remember what real success is like.
Accountant in producing cooked lies shocker.
Are you going to start needily tagging me again trying to prove how interesting you are ?
 
Who do you really support?

You probably missed it but he said 'we' in the United thread regarding this subject. He supports Utd or Arsenal:

"Looks like are willing to spend north of £25m in Schneiderlin , he's a decent player but that seems a bit steep.

Can see this working out similar to Adam the Lama at the mickeys, decent player for a mid table team but not good enough for where they want to go"
 
You probably missed it but he said 'we' in the United thread regarding this subject. He supports Utd or Arsenal:

"Looks like are willing to spend north of £25m in Schneiderlin , he's a decent player but that seems a bit steep.

Can see this working out similar to Adam the Lama at the mickeys, decent player for a mid table team but not good enough for where they want to go"
Where do I say we ?
 
I don't see why 2003 should be the starting point in this argument just cos Roman bought Chelsea. Arsenal were buying big before then, Bergkamp, Platt, Henry, Overmars, Wiltord, Jeffers, Henry, so were the rags, Veron and Ferdinand close to 30 mill pre 2003, that would be 60 mill in todays money?

Crazy to compare figures over that length of time as the money in the game has changed so much the past few years. Clubs have changed, we were once buying Liverpools scraps in Mcmahon, Fowler, David Johnstone, Beardsley etc now they buy ours in Kolo, Balotelli and Milner and we're going after their best player, that would be unheard of 5, 10, 20, 30 years ago.

The bottom line is Arsenal have 2 billionaire owners that have decided not to invest big, our billionaire has, and lastly if you want to go by that table, the top 3 spenders are the teams that have won the league between them the past 11 years, what does that tell you, if you wanna win you gotta spend big.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top