Any updates RicThere's a separate thread to discuss post counts here:
http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/post-counts.314946/
Let's keep this one on topic, about De Bruyne.
Any updates RicThere's a separate thread to discuss post counts here:
http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/post-counts.314946/
Let's keep this one on topic, about De Bruyne.
Not necessarily related to KdB, but what's the point of handing in a transfer request? So the player tells his club he wants to move. Yeah, now how does that change anything or put pressure on the selling club?
German rag here (I come in peace :p), just curious about something.
Not necessarily related to KdB, but what's the point of handing in a transfer request? So the player tells his club he wants to move. Yeah, now how does that change anything or put pressure on the selling club? In the end it's still up to the clubs to agree on a fee. I have never heard of this concept outside the Premier League. When two clubs are negotiating, it's kinda obvious that the player wants out, isn't it?
On a related note, is this "permission to speak to the player" AFTER agreeing a fee a real thing? I could imagine a case where clubs reach an agreement after weeks of negotiating only to find out that the player is not even interested in a move. What's the case here is that usually the buying clubs reaches out to the player's agent, works out the contract details and then gets in touch with the selling club.
KDB will come to City but he isn't going to force the issue.
We've known this for a while so why the press articles?
Easy - this is simply Wolfsburg reafirming to City what has been said in private - i.e. to pay up or fuck off.
On a related note, is this "permission to speak to the player" AFTER agreeing a fee a real thing? I could imagine a case where clubs reach an agreement after weeks of negotiating only to find out that the player is not even interested in a move. What's the case here is that usually the buying clubs reaches out to the player's agent, works out the contract details and then gets in touch with the selling club.
De Bruyne told to snub City
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.../manchester-city-transfer-window-live-9855035
De Bruyne told to snub City
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.../manchester-city-transfer-window-live-9855035
Any updates Ric
HLN said Wolfsburg are demanding £57m, which looks like they are right then....The club are still confident a deal will be done from what I've heard, but looks like the price is being driven up. Told it's likely to be in excess of £50m now, which is more than they had budgeted for.
HLN said Wolfsburg are demanding £57m, which looks like they are right then....
Cheers RicThe club are still confident a deal will be done from what I've heard, but looks like the price is being driven up. Told it's likely to be in excess of £50m now, which is more than they had budgeted for.
What's a matter of puzzlement to me is that various sources, some not especially reliable, some usually reliable, stated that an offcial bid of £46m/£47m was made around 6 to 7 days ago.
I assume it is a normal for the club who received the bid to repond either in the affirmative or negative within a day or two. Or do they sometimes put the offer through the office shredder and ignore the communication completely?
It must be either:-
a) They have responded with a "NO" and we (the supporters) are unaware
b) They have completely ignored it and have failed to respond, hoping that we just "go away"
c) We have not made the bid that was reported in the media last week.
We should just pay what is needed for this player. In future dealings, perhaps go after a player we are only half interested in, offer a stupid amount then walk away when the other team say no. That way, we can show that we are not going to ALWAYS pay over the odds. This one is worth it in my opinion.The club are still confident a deal will be done from what I've heard, but looks like the price is being driven up. Told it's likely to be in excess of £50m now, which is more than they had budgeted for.