Discussion: Manuel Pellegrini 2015/16

Status
Not open for further replies.
What is indisputable is that we had 5 straight clean sheets with a Kompany / Mangala CB pairing, a pairing that has taken time to gel and which has been disrupted by injury. I'd say there's a fair bit more pace in that pairing than MDM / NO and that is important, given the way we play.
Yes there's a lot more pace in the Komps/Mangala partnership so why persist with a high line when the entire back four lacks any real pace? It was magnified last night in the first half by the decision to start a half-fit Yaya as a def. midfielder. Raffael is a 30 year old Brazilian who's never won a full cap and has drifted around the European leagues. For 45 minutes we made him look like Neymar as he repeatedly got behind our back four.
 
Tactically we are quite a poor team. I think this has a lot to do with the manager. Manuel obviously drills it into the players to play their natural game and always look to attack, I see him as very Wenger-esque in his approach, but unless we are 2 or 3 goals ahead we really don't know how to kill off a tight game or hold a lead.

Last night his options were limited due to selection problems. However, and I don't mean to be pessimistic after a win, but while he's our manager I really can't see us doing anything of note in the champions league. Tactics and defensive organisation got atleti to the final last year. Very few teams get to the final by only playing their plan A these days, unless of course you're the barcas of the world and that's perhaps doing then a disservice because I think they are much more tactically astute than we are.

And probably Juventus this year too. You are right. If you are not Barca, Bayern or Madrid you cannot get away with being defensively naive. In fact even the big boys come unstuck sometimes. Bayern last year were in big trouble vs Porto, Madrid obviously lost to a well drilled Juve. We might get out of the group but unless we wise up, which we have shown little sign of, we won´t be going much further.
 
His options last night were almost nil with so many injured and silva and yaya not fit. Given that, the result was excellent. Not sure how he could set up the team different than he did. Well done manuel.

That's the point. This thread is full of "we should be tighter at the back" and all these cliches, when the truth is the team picked itself because of injuries, and Aguero is misfiring worse than at any point in his career, Silva and Yaya aren't fit and Sterling, Otamendi and DE Bruyne are new to the team. It was a mad game of football but it was also one we deserved to win comfortably on balance despite all this.

As OB1 says, we went 5 games with our first choice centre halves and didn't conceed a goal. As soon as we lost both of them we started conceeding silly goals. That is, of course, not a coincidence.

I am not seeing anything whatsoever to worry about because every one of those problems will sort itself, barring long term injury of course. We are not losing midfield battles or getting overrun.
 
And probably Juventus this year too. You are right. If you are not Barca, Bayern or Madrid you cannot get away with being defensively naive. In fact even the big boys come unstuck sometimes. Bayern last year were in big trouble vs Porto, Madrid obviously lost to a well drilled Juve. We might get out of the group but unless we wise up, which we have shown little sign of, we won´t be going much further.

Exactly. Especially away from home we need to change our mentality to being solid and saying okay if we can't win this we won't get beat. If you get at least draws away form home and win your home legs you are high and dry in the champions league. Last night I would have preferred us to setup as 4-3-3 instead of the more attacking 4-2-3-1. Maybe Maunel felt this was a much win game and he needed to be more offensive. Time with tell but I wouldn't be surprised to see us setup the same when we play away to Sevilla and Juve and if we do the result will be different to last night!
 
That's the point. This thread is full of "we should be tighter at the back" and all these cliches, when the truth is the team picked itself because of injuries, and Aguero is misfiring worse than at any point in his career, Silva and Yaya aren't fit and Sterling, Otamendi and DE Bruyne are new to the team. It was a mad game of football but it was also one we deserved to win comfortably on balance despite all this.

As OB1 says, we went 5 games with our first choice centre halves and didn't conceed a goal. As soon as we lost both of them we started conceeding silly goals. That is, of course, not a coincidence.

I am not seeing anything whatsoever to worry about because every one of those problems will sort itself, barring long term injury of course. We are not losing midfield battles or getting overrun.

Of course you are right to a point, selection almost picks itself at the moment. However with Silva clearly not being fully fit he could have setup like this though to protect the defence a little more and bring on Silva against a tired side later in the game:

Hart
Sagna Otamendi Demi Kolarov
Fernadno Yaya Ferds
De Brunye Sterling
Aguero

However let's see the team and tactics he picks against Sevilla and Juve away. I'm predicting it won't change but I'm happy to be pleasantly surprised.
 
I love the way you can't see the enormous hypocrisy in your first sentence.

That reserve back four were all we had available. If we'd have had some of our first choice defenders available we'd have won that game easily. Throw in the fact that most of our biggest names are half fit, and our new boys are still gelling, and we are missing an incredible amount of chances as a result, and that's a damn good result tonight.

We are fine. Mark my words. We will go up the gears as the big guns get fit and improve.

It's quite funny isn't it mate. The manager's getting pelters for once again because he put out a makeshift back four and they struggled. Suddenly he's tactically naive, one dimensional, will only win the title because of the quality of players he has (who doesn't win the title because of that btw?).

Really do wish people would find a way to take half a step back from their own knee jerking and have a think before typing!
 
Of course you are right to a point, selection almost picks itself at the moment. However with Silva clearly not being fully fit he could have setup like this though to protect the defence a little more and bring on Silva against a tired side later in the game:

Hart
Sagna Otamendi Demi Kolarov
Fernadno Yaya Ferds
De Brunye Sterling
Aguero

However let's see the team and tactics he picks against Sevilla and Juve away. I'm predicting it won't change but I'm happy to be pleasantly surprised.

So the team he picked against Spurs? The one which after the Spurs game people were on here saying was the wrong team to pick and that it wasted Yaya pushing him forward when he should've been "dictating the game from deep" or some other wank cliche.

As I said after Spurs - Pellegrini cannot win with far too many posters who have become far too much like the media in terms of their analysis and critiques of him.
 
It's quite funny isn't it mate. The manager's getting pelters for once again because he put out a makeshift back four and they struggled. Suddenly he's tactically naive, one dimensional, will only win the title because of the quality of players he has (who doesn't win the title because of that btw?).

Really do wish people would find a way to take half a step back from their own knee jerking and have a think before typing!
We are one dimensional. We have been for a while. Fortunately, because of the quality of players that you refer to that means it's a dimension that's good enough the majority of time domestically, not so much on our European adventures. We certainly rely on individual magic more often than not.
This will be his last season so I'm just gonna enjoy the ride.
 
So the team he picked against Spurs? The one which after the Spurs game people were on here saying was the wrong team to pick and that it wasted Yaya pushing him forward when he should've been "dictating the game from deep" or some other wank cliche.

As I said after Spurs - Pellegrini cannot win with far too many posters who have become far too much like the media in terms of their analysis and critiques of him.

Correct me if I'm wrong but while it was the same personnel the tactics were still 4-2-3-1. What I'm talking about is keeping all three midfielders central with the exception of Fernando obviously just sitting in front of the defence. Yaya was trying to play like a number 10 against Spurs which still left us over exposed in the middle. This has to come from the manager.

I don't know why you're surprised at posters giving analysis and critique of him on a forum. It's a forum. What are we supposed to do? Talk about the weather.
 
We are one dimensional. We have been for a while. Fortunately, because of the quality of players that you refer to that means it's a dimension that's good enough the majority of time domestically, not so much on our European adventures. We certainly rely on individual magic more often than not.
This will be his last season so I'm just gonna enjoy the ride.

Fundamentally, he is accused of being 'one dimensional' by people who simply prefer a different 'one dimensional' approach. He's no more 'one dimensional' than any other coach in the league. No amount of hand wringing about 'controlling' the midfield is going to change that.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but while it was the same personnel the tactics were still 4-2-3-1. What I'm talking about is keeping all three midfielders central with the exception of Fernando obviously just sitting in front of the defence. Yaya was trying to play like a number 10 against Spurs which still left us over exposed in the middle. This has to come from the manager.

I don't know why you're surprised at posters giving analysis and critique of him on a forum. It's a forum. What are we supposed to do? Talk about the weather.

Oh right. So in tricky away games what you're advocating is that we pick the equivalent of Matic, Mikel, and Ramires, have them sit deep, tell the full backs to not cross the halfway line, and then hope to nick a goal on the break. No thanks.
 
Fundamentally, he is accused of being 'one dimensional' by people who simply prefer a different 'one dimensional' approach. He's no more 'one dimensional' than any other coach in the league. No amount of hand wringing about 'controlling' the midfield is going to change that.
I agree, I don't mind our approach to games. The fact is once we get our first choice CB's playing and our preferred front 4 have a run of games, the lack of midfield protection will become less of an issue.
Could be a fun filled year.
 
2nd in the league, on course in the CL and through to the next round of the Carling Cup.

Some right fucking fannies on here and no doubt thoroughly disappointed they didn't get to shout "told you so" even louder than they already are after our great come back victory away last night in the CL at a side that no other British side has ever beaten at home ;-)

Well done Gaffer and well done the players.
 
2nd in the league, on course in the CL and through to the next round of the Carling Cup.

Some right fucking fannies on here and no doubt thoroughly disappointed they didn't get to shout "told you so" even louder than they already are after our great come back victory away last night in the CL at a side that no other British side has ever beaten at home ;-)

Well done Gaffer and well done the players.

+1
 
I agree, I don't mind our approach to games. The fact is once we get our first choice CB's playing and our preferred front 4 have a run of games, the lack of midfield protection will become less of an issue.
Could be a fun filled year.

There is no lack of midfield protection. It's a cliche dreamed up by people who prefer a one dimensional approach which revolves around being 'pragmatic' and 'solid' rather than entertaining and exciting.
 
What happened to the "go 4-5-1-" brigade?
Are these the same people that now state it's the mentality? Or the high line? Or whatever reasons they bring foreward to keep and try to build on their opinion to replace Pellegrini?

A manager sets up a team and a plan. If it doesn't work he changes things either by orders to the players already on the pitch or making substitutions (or both). Injuries might spoil things, but that's another issue. It was clear the set up didn't work for whatever reason, tactically or maybe too many players simply didn't perform to their abillities. BMG were the better side and played a more direct game groing in to the match, in my opinion playing better than they can do (it was their cupfinal) and spoling a lot of energy. When Yaya was taken off at halftime and Fernando brought on, I think we were more balanced. Yet when having the ball toothless. Silva was not himself, slowing play down and looking for the difficult option all the time, and when Navas came on we looked more direct and you could clearly felt a freshness in our way of play. Same system, change of players in and out and in other positions. With BMG running out of steam (a game does last 90+ minutes) we gained control and actually looked dangerous without hardly giving anything away. The last 20/25 minutes belonged to us. For BMG is lasted 5 minutes too long for them to make a clumpsy challenge that gave us a penalty and 3 points. Zabaleta just came on to make us finally start what I think is the best song for a player we have right now.

Did we play well? No way. Did Pellegrini tried to change it? Yes. Did it work? Yes, but obviously not all about substitutions. So I think Pellegrini did what he had to do.

Is this game an exemple of how we perform in the CL ever since we joined in? In a way yes, because I still feel players perform as if they are new to this competitoin. And yes, we are a big scalp for other teams (and their fans). And we hardly collected results that will frighten opponents. We need to dig out results and keep doing so before we can start feeling more comfortable. Last night we did. Let's hope it's a start to better things in the CL. I don't like the competition but I reckognize the need to do well and that will benefit the whole club.
 
Oh right. So in tricky away games what you're advocating is that we pick the equivalent of Matic, Mikel, and Ramires, have them sit deep, tell the full backs to not cross the halfway line, and then hope to nick a goal on the break. No thanks.

That's not what I said is it. But anyway for tricky away games, certainly in the Champs League, this would bring us more success than Manuel's current tactics. It might not make for a pretty game but it's very naive to think we can outplay everyone with free flowing attacking football, especially away form home in Europe. Surely you can see the argument for us being tactically more defensive minded than we normal are away to the likes of Juve, Barca, Bayern etc???
 
There needs to be some serious thing done on what to do with Yaya Toure in the bigger games.

He looked laboured or injured to me yesterday and has only really shone in the first game of the season where West Brom gave him the freedom of the midfield.

He isn't suited to the number 10 role and cant play in a midfield two due to his defensive deficiencies.

Perhaps he is at the stage where he is only effective if played once a week rather than twice?

I wouldn't mind trying him out in a Pirlo type role with two box to box midfielders ahead of him, he could dictate the play from deep with the two ahead doing the leg work
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top