Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you want to be read negativity then look no further than blue moon, the place is dripping with whinging fuckers,shit badge,shit players,shit ground,shit kit,ect ect ect,its becoming very tiresome ,its not surprising the press give us shit,they look at our own forum and take it from here ,I used to think city fans were the best in the world,all I see now it negatives.

3rd in the league
semi of the cc cup
threw to the knockouts of the cl

brilliant ground
brilliant owners
brilliant youth set up
and yet people still whinge
I see your point, but this place has thousands of posters, lots of subjects to moan about etc. One person moans about the badge, another about certain players and so on. Overall the negativity is not as bad as you make out. Plus, having a moan is what forums are for. In fact I'm moaning right now.
 
So we are the Empire now? Cool. Maybe we should play The Imperial March every time Pellegrini walks out of the tunnel? Throw a black robe over him and he looks just like Emperor Palpatine.

The Guardian raises a valid point though, perhaps we as a club should look to build a Death Star, and then we could aim it right at the Guardian's headquarters and wipe out all the smug twats who work there.

tumblr_mlb9cqjHWq1qerkzao1_500.gif
qs9oas.jpg
 
Last edited:
But until it does change this is the story. What I was alluding to was that it is only city as a club (plus results as you mentioned) who can change this, until then the Etihad is the Death Star and everybody else is righteous!

Have you read the barney ronay article? I used to think that the rags were the evil empire but now it seems to be that the evil empire is the team I support.

Good job my three year old always cheers for the bad guys
 
Just reading most of the UK media outlets this morning and can't believe what i'm seeing, anything to kick us down.

I don't suppose they've actually seen our reaction to a decent point in the end. Plenty of positives; we were the only team to really attack last night, the only team that played football and finally kept a clean sheet without Kompany and overall deserved the 3 points.

However being branded thugs and under-performers based on last nights performance is a disgrace.
Wonder what they would of made of pellers taking the players holding hands over to the away support to celebrate getting a draw at the leagues form team ??
 
Wonder what they would of made of pellers taking the players holding hands over to the away support to celebrate getting a draw at the leagues form team ??

That would have been a sign! In the face of this aggressive home audience. Even if we all were a bit disappointed like Pellers too. But just to show: we are City! Not holding hands but going to our own away fans as a team. I'd take that! Let the media make from it want they want. They do it anyway.
 
That would have been a sign! In the face of this aggressive home audience. Even if we all were a bit disappointed like Pellers too. But just to show: we are City! Not holding hands but going to our own away fans as a team. I'd take that! Let the media make from it want they want. They do it anyway.

I wasn't there, but it seems the team just walked off the field without acknowledging the traveling fans.....

 
I wasn't there, but it seems the team just walked off the field without acknowledging the traveling fans.....

Thanks mate. As this club is planning the next evolutionary step on the manager's level we certainly have to develop other elements of the clubs philosophy. Are the fans just consumers or are they part of a living club culture? To me football is a wonderful event with huge emotions. Fans are an important part of it. The players wouldn't be there without fans and vice versa. That's why I would strongly recommend to define the fans as a part of the team. Having that in mind it makes the game even bigger.
 
Had we won 3 nil last night we would have had bad press because it was first away win in PL since sept, as we where reminded several times during the game.



The neutrals then peak on this as they have nothing better to talk about.

Exactly. Most of us on here go to the matches and know the truth but it is the neutrals and rival fans who see the crap and THEY BELIEVE IT. The club are paying a lot of money to make City go global
but everything is undermined by the press queuing up to have a go at us or downplay all achievements. Our Press Office is poor compared with that at OT and doesn't even do damage limitation.


We don't want favouritism we want fairness. We as fans are entitled to be biased and tribalistic but we should be able to rely on the serious papers and the BBC especially for reliable information not a glorified Red Tissue blog.
 
Exactly. Most of us on here go to the matches and know the truth but it is the neutrals and rival fans who see the crap and THEY BELIEVE IT. The club are paying a lot of money to make City go global
but everything is undermined by the press queuing up to have a go at us or downplay all achievements. Our Press Office is poor compared with that at OT and doesn't even do damage limitation.


We don't want favouritism we want fairness. We as fans are entitled to be biased and tribalistic but we should be able to rely on the serious papers and the BBC especially for reliable information not a glorified Red Tissue blog.

It is never going to happen, I'd ask all Blues to look at who owns our club, really look at them.

Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon Al Mubarak are intensely conservative and corporate to the core. Our press office will never take on the established media, never tell the boiled bollock to f**k off and never tell Savage to shove it where the sun never shines, it will never happen.

We have great owners, everyone here agrees with that, but it's amazing how so few Blues have taken the time to seriously look at the guys at the top. this is from Wiki......


Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan bin Zayed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan (born 20 November 1970), commonly known as Sheikh Mansour,[1][2][3] is the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, minister of presidential affairs and member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi. He is the half brother of the current Emir of UAE, Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan.[4]

He is also the chairman of the ministerial council for services, the Emirates investment authority and the Emirates pacing authority. He sits on the Supreme Petroleum Council and the boards of numerous investment companies including the International Petroleum Investment Company and the Abu Dhabi Investment Council.[4]

Mansour also owns stakes in a number of business ventures, including Virgin Galactic and Sky News Arabia.[5] He is also the owner of the privately held Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG), a specialist investment company that successfully acquired Manchester City Football Club in September 2008, and which has overseen a significant transformation at the Club since that time,[6][7] most notably, the club have won two top flight league titles for the first time since 1968, City's first Premier League titles. On May 21, 2013, Major League Soccer of the United States announced that its second New York City Metropolitan Area club, to be called New York City FC, would begin play in the 2015 season, to be majority-owned by Mansour bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, in association with brothers Hal and Hank Steinbrenner.[8]

Early life and education
Mansour was born in the Abu Dhabi emirate on 20 November 1970, the fifth son of the Emir of Abu Dhabi HH Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan.[3] His mother is Sheikha Fatima woman Mubarak Al Ketbi and he has five full-brothers: Crown Prince Mohammed, Hamdan, Hazza, Tahnoun, and Abdullah.[9] They are known as Bani Fatima or sons of Fatima.[10]

Mansour attended Santa Barbara Community College as an English student in 1989.[11] He is a graduate of United Arab Emirates University where he received a bachelor's degree in international affairs in 1993.[11]

Political career
In 1997, Mansour bin Zayed was appointed chairman of the presidential office, which his father Zayed II is the first and by-then president of UAE. After the death of his father, he was appointed by his eldest half brother, Khalifa II, as first minister of presidential affairs of the United Arab Emirates, which is the merger of the presidential office and presidential court. He also served in a number of positions in Abu Dhabi to support his brother, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

He was appointed chairman of the ministerial council for services, which is considered a ministerial entity attached to the Cabinet, comprising a number of ministers heading the services departments. Since 2000 he chaired National Center for Documentation and Research. In 2004 reshuffle, he became minister for presidential affairs.[11] In 2005, he became the deputy chairman of the Abu Dhabi education council (ADEC), chairman of the Emirates Foundation, Abu Dhabi Food Control Authority, and Abu Dhabi Fund for Development. In 2006, he was named the chairman of the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department. In 2007, he was appointed chairman of Khalifa bin Zayed Charity Foundation.

Mansour served as the chairman of First Gulf Bank until 2006,[12] and as a member of the board of trustees of the Zayed charitable and humanitarian foundation. Mansour has established scholarship programs for U.A.E students to study abroad. He is also chairman of the Emirates horse racing authority (EHRA).[3] On 11 May 2009, he was appointed deputy prime minister, retaining his cabinet post of minister of presidential affairs

Business portfolio
Mansour heads the International Petroleum Investment Company,[14] which owns 71% of Aabar Investments and is used as an investment vehicle.[15]

In 2005, he was appointed as member of Supreme Petroleum Council.[14] In the same year he chaired the board of directors for International Petroleum Investment Company and became the board member of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA). In 2007, he was appointed chairman of the Emirates Investment Authority, the sovereign wealth fund of UAE.[14]

Mansour has a 32% stake in Virgin Galactic after investing $280m in the project through Aabar in July 2009.[16][17] Aabar also has a 9.1% stake in Daimler after purchasing the stake for $2.7 billion in March 2009[18] and it was reported that Aabar wishes to increase its stake to 15% in August 2010.[19] He owns the Abu Dhabi Media Investment Corporation (ADMIC) which partnered with British Sky Broadcasting to establish Sky News Arabia – a new Arabic-language news channel headquartered in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.


As for our Chairman....

Khaldoon Khalifa Al Mubarak[1](Arabic: خلدون المبارك‎; born 1976)[2][3][4] is an Emirati businessman.

Educated in the United States, he entered a career in construction and real estate, becoming CEO of the Mubadala Development Company. He sits on a number of boards, including First Gulf Bank, Aldar Properties and Ferrari.[5] Al Mubarak is also a member of the Executive Council for the Emirate of Abu Dhabi and chairman of Executive Affairs Authority.

He became the chairman of Manchester City Football Club, when the club was bought by the Abu Dhabi United Group back in September 2008.

Early life
Al Mubarak was born in 1976 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and educated in the US, where he obtained a degree in Economics and Finance from Tufts University in Boston, Massachusetts.[6][7] His first position was as a sales-executive at the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company.[8]

Career
Al Mubarak is involved in construction and real estate.[9] After working at the oil company, he was employed by the UAE Offsets Group, where he held a number of positions within the company.[7] Since then he was Executive Vice-President-Corporate at Dolphin Energy. He is the CEO and managing director of government-owned investment company Mubadala Development, whose projects include a $5 billion aluminium plant in King Abdullah Economic City. His company also owns significant stakes in other companies, including a 5% share in Ferrari,[7] an 8.1% share in AMD,[7] a 7.5% share in the Carlyle Group, and a share in General Electric.[10][11] In May 2005 he was appointed vice-chairman of Oasis International Leasing, an Abu Dhabi-based leasing company.[12] Through Mubadala Development, Al Mubarak is chairman of the Imperial College London Diabetes Center (ICLDC) which opened in Abu Dhabi in 2006,[13] vice-chairman of Piaggio Aero,[14] and vice-chairman of LeasePlan.[15] As well as this he sits on many boards including ALDAR Properties, Emirates Foundation and First Gulf Bank.[16]

When the Abu Dhabi government was restructured in 2006, Al Mubarak became chairman of Executive Affairs Authority and a member of the Executive Council for the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.[17][18] He is also an Abu Dhabi Education Council member,[19] a director of the Abu Dhabi Council for Economic Development (ABCED),[20][21] and chairman of the Organization & Administration Department.[12] Al Mubarak is co-chair of the United States Chamber of Commerce's US–U.A.E. Business Council, which was established in 2007,[22] chairman of the Abu Dhabi Media Zone Authority,[23] and vice-chairman of the Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council which was established in 2007.[24][25]

Personal life[edit]
In 2007 Al Mubarak was made Commander of the Star of the Order of the Italian Solidarity for his contributions to economic relationships between Italy and the United Arab Emirates.[19][26] Al Mubarak is a trusted aide of the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.[4] As part of the takeover of Manchester City F.C. by the Abu Dhabi United Group on 21 September 2008 it was reported Al Mubarak would replace Thaksin Shinawatra as chairman.[27] It was also reported that the takeover would be fully completed on 24 September 2008.[28] As chairman of the Abu Dhabi Motor Sport Management Company,[29] Al Mubarak was also a key figure in negotiating for the Grand Prix. He was also influential in getting the FIFA Club World Cup to be held in Abu Dhabi.[30] Al Mubarak is also a member of the Board of Trustees for New York University, and as of 2013[update] was overseeing the development of a campus in Abu Dhabi.[31]
 
And your point is... because they have a rich cv they will sit back and take the media lies and bad publicity? Don't make me laugh... People in those positions use their positions to influence and change - not to accept being whipped my media hacks as the bad guys... They just do it without fanfare
 
And your point is... because they have a rich cv they will sit back and take the media lies and bad publicity? Don't make me laugh... People in those positions use their positions to influence and change - not to accept being whipped my media hacks as the bad guys... They just do it without fanfare

I think this post might take the Missing the Point prize for 2015.
 
I think this post might take the Missing the Point prize for 2015.
Tut tut for your patronisation, posting a couple of cv's is not an answer nor explanation - it is just factual list with no substance to your point. Please notice - not in bold )). Just because they are big fish in the world of commerce and government they will sit back and do nothing about their brand being damaged...I doubt this very much
 
Tut tut for your patronisation, posting a couple of cv's is not an answer nor explanation - it is just factual list with no substance to your point. Please notice - not in bold )). Just because they are big fish in the world of commerce and government they will sit back and do nothing about their brand being damaged...I doubt this very much

I've no idea if you've ever been to the Middle East, I have, a lot over 25 years. The UAE is no different from Saudi, Kuwait and Qatar they're all intensely conservative monarchies, the ruling family keeps the existing structures in place by ensuring that rivals for political power all get a slice of the corporate cake while retaining control of oil for themselves.

The UAE is at the forefront of diversifying away from fossil fuel dependency and promoting itself on many levels worldwide. There are many driving forces behind it, not just oil but this is not the place to discuss that.

The one thing you have to understand and clearly do not is that they are not us, they make business decisions very much in the Harvard business school model, not averse to short term gain, but more with an eye on the medium to long term view. They have financial muscle but they feel acutely that they don't have the respect that comes with it. For all their wealth there is always a faint whiff of inferiority complex about corporate elites in the oil rich states, they crave acceptance, so when they analyse a problem they look at the prevailing modus operandi in the business model they want to enter, dissect it, then do it better.

They rarely, if ever, overtly take on existing structures, they might quietly have a word behind the scenes, but the "fuck you" school of management? No chance. They crave acceptance and in doing so play the long game.

The brand damage you are referring to are the agony pains of the existing power structures in the football media, and elsewhere, coming to terms with an unwelcome interloper, all perfectly predictable, it was always going to be that way, they will have factored this in. This is a process that is inevitable and has to be gone through, to interrupt it is pointless and counter productive it must be allowed to run its course, after a while it will peter out and City will sit at the top table not only on merit, but, and this is the important point, accepted.
 
I've no idea if you've ever been to the Middle East, I have, a lot over 25 years. The UAE is no different from Saudi, Kuwait and Qatar they're all intensely conservative monarchies, the ruling family keeps the existing structures in place by ensuring that rivals for political power all get a slice of the corporate cake while retaining control of oil for themselves.

The UAE is at the forefront of diversifying away from fossil fuel dependency and promoting itself on many levels worldwide. There are many driving forces behind it, not just oil but this is not the place to discuss that.

The one thing you have to understand and clearly do not is that they are not us, they make business decisions very much in the Harvard business school model, not averse to short term gain, but more with an eye on the medium to long term view. They have financial muscle but they feel acutely that they don't have the respect that comes with it. For all their wealth there is always a faint whiff of inferiority complex about corporate elites in the oil rich states, they crave acceptance, so when they analyse a problem they look at the prevailing modus operandi in the business model they want to enter, dissect it, then do it better.

They rarely, if ever, overtly take on existing structures, they might quietly have a word behind the scenes, but the "fuck you" school of management? No chance. They crave acceptance and in doing so play the long game.

The brand damage you are referring to are the agony pains of the existing power structures in the football media, and elsewhere, coming to terms with an unwelcome interloper, all perfectly predictable, it was always going to be that way, they will have factored this in. This is a process that is inevitable and has to be gone through, to interrupt it is pointless and counter productive it must be allowed to run its course, after a while it will peter out and City will sit at the top table not only on merit but and this is the important point, accepted.
He should have known all that, seemed obvious to the rest of us.
 
I've no idea if you've ever been to the Middle East, I have, a lot over 25 years. The UAE is no different from Saudi, Kuwait and Qatar they're all intensely conservative monarchies, the ruling family keeps the existing structures in place by ensuring that rivals for political power all get a slice of the corporate cake while retaining control of oil for themselves.

The UAE is at the forefront of diversifying away from fossil fuel dependency and promoting itself on many levels worldwide. There are many driving forces behind it, not just oil but this is not the place to discuss that.

The one thing you have to understand and clearly do not is that they are not us, they make business decisions very much in the Harvard business school model, not averse to short term gain, but more with an eye on the medium to long term view. They have financial muscle but they feel acutely that they don't have the respect that comes with it. For all their wealth there is always a faint whiff of inferiority complex about corporate elites in the oil rich states, they crave acceptance, so when they analyse a problem they look at the prevailing modus operandi in the business model they want to enter, dissect it, then do it better.

They rarely, if ever, overtly take on existing structures, they might quietly have a word behind the scenes, but the "fuck you" school of management? No chance. They crave acceptance and in doing so play the long game.

The brand damage you are referring to are the agony pains of the existing power structures in the football media, and elsewhere, coming to terms with an unwelcome interloper, all perfectly predictable, it was always going to be that way, they will have factored this in. This is a process that is inevitable and has to be gone through, to interrupt it is pointless and counter productive it must be allowed to run its course, after a while it will peter out and City will sit at the top table not only on merit, but, and this is the important point, accepted.
Very interesting and well observed précis.
 
I've no idea if you've ever been to the Middle East, I have, a lot over 25 years. The UAE is no different from Saudi, Kuwait and Qatar they're all intensely conservative monarchies, the ruling family keeps the existing structures in place by ensuring that rivals for political power all get a slice of the corporate cake while retaining control of oil for themselves.

The UAE is at the forefront of diversifying away from fossil fuel dependency and promoting itself on many levels worldwide. There are many driving forces behind it, not just oil but this is not the place to discuss that.

The one thing you have to understand and clearly do not is that they are not us, they make business decisions very much in the Harvard business school model, not averse to short term gain, but more with an eye on the medium to long term view. They have financial muscle but they feel acutely that they don't have the respect that comes with it. For all their wealth there is always a faint whiff of inferiority complex about corporate elites in the oil rich states, they crave acceptance, so when they analyse a problem they look at the prevailing modus operandi in the business model they want to enter, dissect it, then do it better.

They rarely, if ever, overtly take on existing structures, they might quietly have a word behind the scenes, but the "fuck you" school of management? No chance. They crave acceptance and in doing so play the long game.

The brand damage you are referring to are the agony pains of the existing power structures in the football media, and elsewhere, coming to terms with an unwelcome interloper, all perfectly predictable, it was always going to be that way, they will have factored this in. This is a process that is inevitable and has to be gone through, to interrupt it is pointless and counter productive it must be allowed to run its course, after a while it will peter out and City will sit at the top table not only on merit, but, and this is the important point, accepted.
Wow double patronised.. Yes, i know all about the oil diversification business models of the UAE and yes, I do know that part of the world well - better than your assumptions. Doing nothing when their reputation and business model is threatened sounds lame. They may not wish to take things heads on, in full view or public view but, to do 'nothing' sounds out of type. When you go back to the UAE try saying to a prominent business man that he and his families money stink and that he cheated his way to success. Then, maybe, stereotype him and call them on their principles. Let's see if he gladly accepts it because we might stop saying it someday... Let me know how you fair?

Ps You kinda sound like a media department spinning their lack of influence on several years of media bias on the owners background - culture - cv.
 
I've no idea if you've ever been to the Middle East, I have, a lot over 25 years. The UAE is no different from Saudi, Kuwait and Qatar they're all intensely conservative monarchies, the ruling family keeps the existing structures in place by ensuring that rivals for political power all get a slice of the corporate cake while retaining control of oil for themselves.

The UAE is at the forefront of diversifying away from fossil fuel dependency and promoting itself on many levels worldwide. There are many driving forces behind it, not just oil but this is not the place to discuss that.

The one thing you have to understand and clearly do not is that they are not us, they make business decisions very much in the Harvard business school model, not averse to short term gain, but more with an eye on the medium to long term view. They have financial muscle but they feel acutely that they don't have the respect that comes with it. For all their wealth there is always a faint whiff of inferiority complex about corporate elites in the oil rich states, they crave acceptance, so when they analyse a problem they look at the prevailing modus operandi in the business model they want to enter, dissect it, then do it better.

They rarely, if ever, overtly take on existing structures, they might quietly have a word behind the scenes, but the "fuck you" school of management? No chance. They crave acceptance and in doing so play the long game.

The brand damage you are referring to are the agony pains of the existing power structures in the football media, and elsewhere, coming to terms with an unwelcome interloper, all perfectly predictable, it was always going to be that way, they will have factored this in. This is a process that is inevitable and has to be gone through, to interrupt it is pointless and counter productive it must be allowed to run its course, after a while it will peter out and City will sit at the top table not only on merit, but, and this is the important point, accepted.

You make a fair argument.
I would have thought that the old saying "mud sticks" has a UAE equivalent, though?
Surely, there comes a point where their integrity cannot be impugned without rebuttal?
Perhaps surreptitiously made but made nonetheless.
 
Exactly. Most of us on here go to the matches and know the truth but it is the neutrals and rival fans who see the crap and THEY BELIEVE IT. The club are paying a lot of money to make City go global
but everything is undermined by the press queuing up to have a go at us or downplay all achievements. Our Press Office is poor compared with that at OT and doesn't even do damage limitation.


We don't want favouritism we want fairness. We as fans are entitled to be biased and tribalistic but we should be able to rely on the serious papers and the BBC especially for reliable information not a glorified Red Tissue blog.

Absolutely this. Sat listening to talksport yesterday (I know, I know) and the phone-in was about why City are under performing, we have the best squad in the league, should be ten points clear blah blah they even managed to get in why are there always empty seats it was classic let's stick the boot into City type coverage.

The thing is its so full of contradictions because whilst telling us we have the best squad they proceed to slag off Yaya, slag off Mangala and Otamendi and completely ignore the fact that we have been without Kompany, aguero and Silva for large parts of the season.

But then I'm sat there thinking why isn't there a similar assassination of the Rags who currently sit 6th or Chelsea who are currently relegation candidates!!

I wouldn't be bothered other than the fact that other fans listen to this sh*t and regurgitate it verbatim and worse still City fans themselves come on moaning with our supposed 'predicament' that then permeates our match going fans and affects the atmosphere at the games.

I'm sure this isn't true of everyone but I guarantee it is absolutely the case for a section of our support. My frustration is then our own fans do the media bidding on forums such as this. However you cut it 3 points off top spot can not in any way be considered a disaster but reading on here you'd think it is. The media in my eyes have a large part to play in that.
 
Absolutely this. Sat listening to talksport yesterday (I know, I know) and the phone-in was about why City are under performing, we have the best squad in the league, should be ten points clear blah blah they even managed to get in why are there always empty seats it was classic let's stick the boot into City type coverage.

The thing is its so full of contradictions because whilst telling us we have the best squad they proceed to slag off Yaya, slag off Mangala and Otamendi and completely ignore the fact that we have been without Kompany, aguero and Silva for large parts of the season.

But then I'm sat there thinking why isn't there a similar assassination of the Rags who currently sit 6th or Chelsea who are currently relegation candidates!!

I wouldn't be bothered other than the fact that other fans listen to this sh*t and regurgitate it verbatim and worse still City fans themselves come on moaning with our supposed 'predicament' that then permeates our match going fans and affects the atmosphere at the games.

I'm sure this isn't true of everyone but I guarantee it is absolutely the case for a section of our support. My frustration is then our own fans do the media bidding on forums such as this. However you cut it 3 points off top spot can not in any way be considered a disaster but reading on here you'd think it is. The media in my eyes have a large part to play in that.
Exactly. Whilst there is no doubt we have underperformed, one would think Chelsea's abortion of a season is more worthy of a national radio phone in than the side currently 3rd in the table.
The BT Sports coverage of the Leicester game was terrible. The whole narrative of the evening was that despite spending vast amounts of money, we are a bit shit and how glad we (BT) are about it.
It just gets tiresome after a while.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top