Thanks,she said about 6 weeks,if i can find this thread again then i will update
I know it's a worry for you but put it to the back of your mind. Just concentrate on the footie:)
Keep us updated.
Thanks,she said about 6 weeks,if i can find this thread again then i will update
Will do lovelyI know it's a worry for you but put it to the back of your mind. Just concentrate on the footie:)
Keep us updated.
Motability was,is and never has been a gravy train or a racket,sure just like anything else a small number have taken the piss,compare that to the corporations paying sweet fa in tax,some politicians fleecing us for all they can get the amount of money wasted by bureaucratic cock ups and any flaws in the motability system pale in to insignificance.
When I was kid it was usually war veterans who were given a three wheeled deathtrap which made a reliant look like a rolls royce,they were single seaters meaning the disabled always travelled alone.
Thankfully motability came along and enabled families and carers to travel with those eligible,it's never been easy for just anyone to get a free car,your comments are symptomatic of those who always regard some getting something for nowt and smacks of a little jealousy rather than being glad that motability was so forward looking an idea which has given some form of independence to thousands.
please elaborateIt's not for 'nowt' as you put it
please elaborate
Then you misunderstand,I didn't say they were free,read the post again,what I said was that there are those who criticise the motabiliy scheme because they believe people are getting something for nowt,I believe no such thing.Elaborate... As I said they are not free. The vehicles are leased, a deposit is usually required (was in my case) and you pay £53 per week. Of course this is taken from benefit.... So some may say that is free I suppose
Then you misunderstand,I didn't say they were free,read the post again,what I said was that there are those who criticise the motabiliy scheme because they believe people are getting something for nowt,I believe no such thing.
Motability was,is and never has been a gravy train or a racket,sure just like anything else a small number have taken the piss,compare that to the corporations paying sweet fa in tax,some politicians fleecing us for all they can get the amount of money wasted by bureaucratic cock ups and any flaws in the motability system pale in to insignificance.
When I was kid it was usually war veterans who were given a three wheeled deathtrap which made a reliant look like a rolls royce,they were single seaters meaning the disabled always travelled alone.
Thankfully motability came along and enabled families and carers to travel with those eligible,it's never been easy for just anyone to get a free car,your comments are symptomatic of those who always regard some getting something for nowt and smacks of a little jealousy rather than being glad that motability was so forward looking an idea which has given some form of independence to thousands.
It was obvious he'd be stinking up another thread with his Taxpayers Alliance trolling, like he does with every single other thread that relates in any way to public spending. He is an exceptionally bitter individual who resents every single penny of tax he has to pay. He doesn't care that our welfare state, our NHS and our public services are the glue that binds society together. He would do away with all of it. He is a complete fucking misanthrope.
As someone who takes every opportunity to highlight abuse of the benefits system I assume you've reported him to the DWP then?Motability was a racket that got out of hand.
It became very easy indeed to qualify for a free car. My dad was told he'd qualify for one 20 odd years ago because of a very minor disability which hasn't stopped him being fully mobile either then or in the years since.
Makes we want to fucking weep this thread.
I'm what way? Anyone with a legitimate disability should be looked after. Anyone taking the piss should be reviewed. Simple as that I would have thought. Think Urmston has been ganged up on a little to be fair. I am assuming he has had more negative posts removed as his one I can see on here doesn't see that provocative.
You repeat the people will be looked after if they are genuine and some are whilst a lot fall through the cracks or are passed fit when they are not,from the very mouth of the ATOS women who came to see me yesterday and unless you have a terminal condition all are being reviewd over timeI'm what way? Anyone with a legitimate disability should be looked after. Anyone taking the piss should be reviewed. Simple as that I would have thought. Think Urmston has been ganged up on a little to be fair. I am assuming he has had more negative posts removed as his one I can see on here doesn't see that provocative.
You repeat the people will be looked after if they are genuine and some are whilst a lot fall through the cracks or are passed fit when they are not,from the very mouth of the ATOS women who came to see me yesterday and unless you have a terminal condition all are being reviewd over time
Don't you read the papers listen to what actual sick people say? Tory fucking nonsense
Urmston was banned for trolling this thread as he usual does and rightly so
Ffs I couldn't give a fucking toss about the ego's and attitudes of some so called "contributors" on this forum pal.
My comment was in respect of reading about the experiences of decent, honest people being treated like shit by a society that is systematically failing to take proper care of those in need.
That makes me want to weep.
Hope that's a bit clearer.
Why are you saying ffs?