Isco right now has a 25 million price tag. Already mentioned douglas costa.
If the likes of arsenal can get sanchez for less than 50 mil what makes you think we can't get anyone better than sterling for less?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Riyad Mahrez
- Thread starter Otamendi's Beard
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Isco right now has a 25 million price tag. Already mentioned douglas costa.
If the likes of arsenal can get sanchez for less than 50 mil what makes you think we can't get anyone better than sterling for less?
So you don't want us to waste money on any overhyped players but you want us to sign a 24 year old who hasn't even completed his one stand-out season yet? I'm not denying that he's a nifty little player but surely you see the contradiction there?
I'm intrigued to see who these other players are that you have in mind.
When did I say I want us to sign mahrez?
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
When did I say I want us to sign mahrez?
Yesterday at 11:11pm.
"Mahrez would be a good signing but I don't think it would happen."
Unless he would be a good signing that you don't want?
Yesterday at 11:11pm.
"Mahrez would be a good signing but I don't think it would happen."
Unless he would be a good signing that you don't want?
He's be a good signing yes considering we won't get him for 50 mil if we were after him.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
He's be a good signing yes considering we won't get him for 50 mil if we were after him.
He might be a shit signing that goes back to being average next season. You've already written off a player who is three years younger, has played at a higher level and won us some important games.
If Mahrez is widely accepted as a better player than Sterling in three years, I'll eat my own face.
To suggest we can't find great addition for less than 50 million is frankly silly. We could, and mentioning names isn't necessary.
That said, Sterling is a fantastic buy for multiple reasons. And while he was expensive, this is not proof he was a bad choice.
That said, Sterling is a fantastic buy for multiple reasons. And while he was expensive, this is not proof he was a bad choice.
Blue Expat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 534
To suggest we can't find great addition for less than 50 million is frankly silly. We could, and mentioning names isn't necessary.
That said, Sterling is a fantastic buy for multiple reasons. And while he was expensive, this is not proof he was a bad choice.
How many big games did Sterling had a big influence in and was the MOTM ?
You are a man who appreciate Stats, and and according to the Stats, Yaya Toure had a better performances this season than Sterling.
I don't pretend he has been great, but I like his potential, his age, his explosiveness, and I'm excited about what he can do under Pep and after a year of acclimatizing to his teammates.How many big games did Sterling had a big influence in and was the MOTM ?
You are a man who appreciate Stats, and and according to the Stats, Yaya Toure had a better performances this season than Sterling.
He might be a shit signing that goes back to being average next season. You've already written off a player who is three years younger, has played at a higher level and won us some important games.
If Mahrez is widely accepted as a better player than Sterling in three years, I'll eat my own face.
I don't mind sterling. I just don't think he's worth 50 mil. Neither is stones who's been recently linked with us for the same price
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
I don't mind sterling. I just don't think he's worth 50 mil. Neither is stones who's been recently linked with us for the same price
Right but it's not your money is it? That would be fair enough if you had absolutely any idea how much revenue will be brought in because of the signing of Sterling. You actually haven't a clue so I don't know why you're pretending to know what any player is worth. The reason why English players cost more is because they have potential to make their club a shitload more money. I'm confused as to why you're bringing up John Stones.
Footballing ability is one of a whole list of things considered when deciding on a fee. I'd guess it wouldn't even be particularly high on that list.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.