What i said was wo could we have got for less than sterling wh was better, as it was suggested here were several players in this category.To suggest we can't find great addition for less than 50 million is frankly silly. We could, and mentioning names isn't necessary.
That said, Sterling is a fantastic buy for multiple reasons. And while he was expensive, this is not proof he was a bad choice.
Right but it's not your money is it? That would be fair enough if you had absolutely any idea how much revenue will be brought in because of the signing of Sterling. You actually haven't a clue so I don't know why you're pretending to know what any player is worth. The reason why English players cost more is because they have potential to make their club a shitload more money. I'm confused as to why you're bringing up John Stones.
Footballing ability is one of a whole list of things considered when deciding on a fee. I'd guess it wouldn't even be particularly high on that list.
City Watch now writing we will try to acquire Mahrez in the summer.
Id love to have him over someone like Navas or filler to Bony if he leaves.Hopefully he could become our next Ali B ;)
City Watch is reporting whats in the Sunday tabloids.City Watch now writing we will try to acquire Mahrez in the summer.