cheddar404
Well-Known Member
100% conclusive. Is that a Salvador Dali?
That quite clearly shows the ball cannoning off his back, plus his arm is hardly in an unnatural position.
Thanks. That was the name I was trying to think of.
Aye conclusive proof,a 2 dimensional image with no depth,the Turin shroud and Hitler diaries look credibile compared to that.
Spursmad was an ITK and the assumption was that he was a member of the coaching staff iirc.Obvious who it is mate.
100% conclusive. Is that a Salvador Dali?
Spursmad was an ITK and the assumption was that he was a member of the coaching staff iirc.
So the question is then: Do you agree with what appears to be overwhelming opinion from supporters of most clubs that there is something seriously amiss with current day refereeing standards, or are we all paranoid? It seems obvious that 100.000 lemmings can't ALL be wrong, doesn't it?Honestly mate, there is a thread like this on every clubs forum I've ever been on - with the possible exception of ManUtd obviously.
And until they start using video evidence it will never change.
It's obvious who it is. Steffi is back. There is only one Spurs fan so fucking one eyed and one Spurs fan with the brass neck to bend the most ridiculous arguments to suit his narrative. It's graph man. Fuck him off mate before he starts getting his stats out.Spursmad was an ITK and the assumption was that he was a member of the coaching staff iirc.
And as the nearest linesman would have been the one on the East Stand, and probably on the half way line, he wouldn't be in a position to advise. Neither could the linesman on the CB stand, as he had Sterling's body in the way. Both of them, therefore, in the perfect position for him to give it!Never a handball,and another reason it shouldn't of been given is,in Harry Kane's own words "the referee wasn't sure if it was inside or outside"
Clattenburg pointed to the spot too quickly to of spoke to any assistant or even thought about it,the cheating **** has said he wasn't sure after he'd given it,IMO.
Would be as least as likely as my suggestion as in the prem we have certain players that like to get in the ears of refs. And the Fa would never allow poster boys like Rooney to be shown as the moaned we all know he is in front of a live audience...Mike them up and get them to justify the big decisions, in real time.
I hope your wrong, Im looking forward to it, I know we just lost to spurs but I think the city of old started to appear in the second half and I think we'll destroy them, but with them two we'll be lucky to get a draw.Mystic Mat predicts:
Mike Dean for the Rags match with Clattenberg 4th official.
Got a gut feeling...
I think that was Paul, aka THFC6061. http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/hello-from-thfc6061.1009184/Its definately the joker we had in the general forum who did nothing but wum and plug his own website/blog
I think that was Paul, aka THFC6061. http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/hello-from-thfc6061.1009184/
Mystic Mat predicts:
Mike Dean for the Rags match with Clattenberg 4th official.
Got a gut feeling...
So the question is then: Do you agree with what appears to be overwhelming opinion from supporters of most clubs that there is something seriously amiss with current day refereeing standards, or are we all paranoid? It seems obvious that 100.000 lemmings can't ALL be wrong, doesn't it?
On the subject of video evidence, do you seriously think that the FA/PL/PGMOL/UEFA/FIFA et al, want this introducing at the top level? There are far too many vested interests for that to happen. Well, not in my lifetime, to paraphrase a well-known (and much hated) former manager.