B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Im just glad we dont beat all the poor sides 1-0 because we would have a thread moaning we dont go for the jugular and boost our goal difference....
Thanks for the explanation. So regarding football, where the only person handling the ball is the keeper and our development has different types of grass built in, plus it's cricket, makes it a stupid term to apply to football. imho.It's a cricket term and refers to a batsman who excels on a flat pitch (i.e. one without a great deal of bounce or movement) but struggles when the pitch means the bowler can make the ball move.
Thanks for the explanation. So regarding football, where the only person handling the ball is the keeper and our development has different types of grass built in, plus it's cricket, makes it a stupid term to apply to football. imho.
LolI'm guessing his answer would be your user name!
graham Hick, that paragon of football. Jog on, talking shite and you know itNot really. Graeme Hick exemplified this. A guy who murdered county bowling but struggled at Test level. But it also applies in golf where a player can win numerous tournaments but never a major,ie when the pressure is on. Same with football. The United side under Ferguson were often exemplars of this, thrashing hapless PL sides with their unsophisticated attack, attack mentality only to become badly undone against Europe's elite many times over the years.
Horse racing, some horses only win on flat tracks, throw an aul hill in and they're fuckedNot really. Graeme Hick exemplified this. A guy who murdered county bowling but struggled at Test level. But it also applies in golf where a player can win numerous tournaments but never a major,ie when the pressure is on. Same with football. The United side under Ferguson were often exemplars of this, thrashing hapless PL sides with their unsophisticated attack, attack mentality only to become badly undone against Europe's elite many times over the years.
Even more so when you bang some fences up, is this relevant though ?Horse racing, some horses only win on flat tracks, throw an aul hill in and they're fucked
Not really. The flat track meant an easier game of cricket therefore an easier game of football.Thanks for the explanation. So regarding football, where the only person handling the ball is the keeper and our development has different types of grass built in, plus it's cricket, makes it a stupid term to apply to football. imho.
Even more so when you bang some fences up, is this relevant though ?
I my have added to said irrelevance come to think if itNo, no it isn't. I just brain farted into my phone. This thread is pretty irrelevant and I added an irrelevant post, that was irrelevant to an irrelevant thread.
Oops, I did it again
That you have to explain it in such detail is piss poorNot really. The flat track meant an easier game of cricket therefore an easier game of football.
That's thinking any one gives a shit about cricket. laughs on you, you flat track bullshitterNot really. The flat track meant an easier game of cricket therefore an easier game of football.
Haha! It's got your goat this one hasn't it, mate!That's thinking any one gives a shit about cricket. laughs on you, you flat track bullshitter
go on then, apart from cricket and beating other sides with goals to spare, boredom is kicking in.Haha! It's got your goat this one hasn't it, mate!
Go on then what? I'm enjoying your posts on the subject. I'm not in one camp or the other, though I did get what the OP was getting at by the use of the phrase.go on then, apart from cricket and beating other sides with goals to spare, boredom is kicking in.