Paul Pogba

Status
Not open for further replies.
He may well turn out to be the best player in the world but I have my doubts. For this sort of money you want someone like Suarez who has been rippin it up in england and spain.

As City fans ask yourselves this would you swap him for Kun? No chance.

For me they have just thrown 100 million on a vanity project. Veron will seem small change.
 
http://www.squawka.com/news/revealed-the-190m-cost-of-manchester-uniteds-deal-for-paul-pogba/742867

Pogba.png

And yet, I still don't believe they're only paying 89mil for him... I smell rag PR bullshit
 
He may well turn out to be the best player in the world but I have my doubts. For this sort of money you want someone like Suarez who has been rippin it up in england and spain.

As City fans ask yourselves this would you swap him for Kun? No chance.

For me they have just thrown 100 million on a vanity project. Veron will seem small change.

Well I don't think I'd swap Kun for anybody. It could be Messi, Ronaldo, Suarez himself.

I'd have loved Pogba here. A midfield three of Gundogan - Pogba - Fernandinho would have been sensational. It's a massive shame and I still have no idea what would possess him to return to a club that essentially discarded him.

And is he worth 100M? Of course not, but I don't understand why those lot would care. It's not the fans' money and he's a huge player with potential to get even better.
 
That video they've released is embarrassing!
Him removing his hood and saying "I'm back", cringey as fuck. Then there's the "reUNITED" and "pogback" shite
 
And yet, I still don't believe they're only paying 89mil for him... I smell rag PR bullshit

It is. I posted earlier in the thread about compensation due on the future sale of a player who is under 24 and refuses a new contract. Whilst not definitive, after some research it seems that any club who bought Pogba, 30% of the profit made by Juve is due to the scum.

So, offsetting that payment, the rags are paying £89m which is 70% of the total figure. Now my maths ain't great but I think that works out at £127m plus change.
 
He may well turn out to be the best player in the world but I have my doubts. For this sort of money you want someone like Suarez who has been rippin it up in england and spain.

As City fans ask yourselves this would you swap him for Kun? No chance.

For me they have just thrown 100 million on a vanity project. Veron will seem small change.
No, I probably wouldn't swap a midfielder for a striker. That'd be silly. Would I have Pogba in our first XI, though? Absolutely.
 
It is. I posted earlier in the thread about compensation due on the future sale of a player who is under 24 and refuses a new contract. Whilst not definitive, after some research it seems that any club who bought Pogba, 30% of the profit made by Juve is due to the scum.

So, offsetting that payment, the rags are paying £89m which is 70% of the total figure. Now my maths ain't great but I think that works out at £127m plus change.

I don't believe this to be correct.
Compensation is paid the the training club on every transfer until the end of the season of the player's 23rd birthday. That season has just gone, and compensation is no longer due.

Even if it were due, the training costs are not a percentage of a transfer fee, they are are based on the costs that would have been incurred by the new club had they trained the player themselves. But again, it's null and void because we have passed the end of the season in which his 23rd birthday occurred.

United aren't paying 127m for the transfer. £90m is plenty enough - plus his wages (which may well be comparable with or better than Rooney). Who knows that's other addons they have too. It's still a whopping sum of money and will break the world record for a player that's not really set the world alight in the way that say Maradona, or even Ronaldo did.
 
Last edited:
well, shit.

I dont see our current midfield competing with him running at it as things stand, hes been part of a team thats beaten us home and away last year and he played a big part
Hopefully their galactico like mentality doesnt win out
 
Our rivals got better today, price tag irrelevant
This is my assessment too.

The most frustrating thing about this whole sorry episode is that we could have had Pogba last summer for considerably less than £89m, but Txiki did what Txiki does and acted too late in the window for him to even consider moving to us.

He's the sort of midfield player we've lacked since Toure's world class 13/14 season. He's a player who can grab a game by the scruff of the neck and break it apart, either with a fantastic goal or a blinding moment of vision (think back to this goal). We have a good squad and arguably the best manager on the planet - if we can get Hart, Kompany, Gundogan, Fernandinho, Silva, De Bruyne and Aguero fit and firing then I can't imagine we'll look too regretfully over at Old Trafford while Pogba goes from strength to strength - but this is a serious missed opportunity that we should have taken.

United were never going to be gone for long - all this "tick tock", Save Our Dave stuff was premature - because they're a huge business and huge businesses stretch themselves constantly to remain on top, but they've come back earlier than expected and this signing is a huge statement of intent. If they use him properly, which I'm not entirely sure on, he will be the man who rebuilds their new era. When we announced Guardiola, United were hurting and they've responded by getting Mourinho, Pogba and Mkhitaryan before the start of the new season. It's the sort of ruthlessness I believe we lack in the market at the moment (we're haggling over a few bob for Stones, struggling to get rid of the deadwood) and it could cost us in the near future.

I suppose the wider issues are a discussion for another time, but the harsh truth is that Pogba could have and should have been a City player last season. He's not, and now he plays for our greatest rivals. The fault for this lies at the door of Txiki Begiristain, so he's going to have to work some serious magic to make sure the consequences aren't too damaging.
 
I don't believe this to be correct.
Compensation is paid the the training club on every transfer until the end of the season of the player's 23rd birthday. That season has just gone, and compensation is no longer due.

Even if it were due, the training costs are not a percentage of a transfer fee, they are are based on the costs that would have been incurred by the new club had they trained the player themselves. But again, it's null and void because we have passed the end of the season in which his 23rd birthday occurred.

United aren't paying 127m for the transfer. £90m is plenty enough - plus his wages (which may well be comparable with or better than Rooney). Who knows that's other addons they have too. It's still a whopping sum of money and will break the world record for a player that's not really set the world alight in the way that say Maradona, or even Ronaldo did.

I'm not sure that is totally accurate. My understanding is that the compensation at the agreed percentage, can be levied on the profit of the next sale.

Why you are talking about being 23 as the guide for compensation? I'm referring to the guidelines that are for players under 24?
 
We've fucked up so bad. With all this talk of prem clubs having insane amount of money why aren't we throwing around £100million bids? We could try throw that for griezman or Bale or even kroos. An attack of Ibra Pogba Mikhitaryan and Martial is frightening. We've got so many past it players it's a joke.
 
I don't believe this to be correct.
Compensation is paid the the training club on every transfer until the end of the season of the player's 23rd birthday. That season has just gone, and compensation is no longer due.

Even if it were due, the training costs are not a percentage of a transfer fee, they are are based on the costs that would have been incurred by the new club had they trained the player themselves. But again, it's null and void because we have passed the end of the season in which his 23rd birthday occurred.

United aren't paying 127m for the transfer. £90m is plenty enough - plus his wages (which may well be comparable with or better than Rooney). Who knows that's other addons they have too. It's still a whopping sum of money and will break the world record for a player that's not really set the world alight in the way that say Maradona, or even Ronaldo did.

In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level. It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future.

Taken from http://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2014/05/compensation-players-24-mystery/
 
I'm not sure that is totally accurate. My understanding is that the compensation at the agreed percentage, can be levied on the profit of the next sale.

Why you are talking about being 23 as the guide for compensation? I'm referring to the guidelines that are for players under 24?
I am talking about the FIFA regulations for young players who leave the club they trained at - which applies until they are 23 (i.e. under 24), but the fine print states it applies until the end of the season in which their 23rd birthday occurs.

What 'agreed percentage' are you talking about? and the agreement between whom?
If a player played for Club A, moves to Club B, then to Club C, then Club D, Clubs C & D are not going to be paying a percentage of their profit to Club A based on any agreement they made with club B. They'll only pay statutory compensation (per FIFA rules) to the training club/s and that is NOT a percentage fee.
 
In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level. It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future.

Taken from http://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2014/05/compensation-players-24-mystery/

The PFCC isn't for European transfers it's for English ones only and comes into being when a player leaves at the end of his contract and is under 24. So they'll set an appropriate fee that might include addons etc.
It doesn't apply to Pogba, he wasn't sold between two English clubs.
The PFCC also only comes into play if both clubs can't agree - it's an arbitrator (although it's final judgment is binding). It doesn't rule on every case, only ones where there's a dispute.
 
Last edited:
Thank fuck this transfer is done, we would have been slaughtered for paying this amount, never wanted him at city each time I've seen him he's never convinced me. I believe pep didn't want him and that's good enough for me.
 
I am talking about the FIFA regulations for young players who leave the club they trained at - which applies until they are 23 (i.e. under 24), but the fine print states it applies until the end of the season in which their 23rd birthday occurs.

What 'agreed percentage' are you talking about? and the agreement between whom?
If a player played for Club A, moves to Club B, then to Club C, then Club D, Clubs C & D are not going to be paying a percentage of their profit to Club A based on any agreement they made with club B. They'll only pay statutory compensation (per FIFA rules) to the training club/s and that is NOT a percentage fee.

Well, the agreed percentage as part of the contract negotiations.

I'll have to research it, but in the back of my mind there was a major transfer that ended up with, I think, something like Tranmere or Fleetwood getting about £5k because of that type of deal.
 
Last edited:
The PFCC isn't for European transfers it's for English ones only and comes into being when a player leaves at the end of his contract and is under 24. So they'll set an appropriate fee that might include addons etc.
It doesn't apply to Pogba, he wasn't sold between two English clubs.
The PFCC also only comes into play if both clubs can't agree - it's an arbitrator (although it's final judgment is binding). It doesn't rule on every case, only ones where there's a dispute.

OK, a simple question for you. Rather than go round in circles. Do you believe that when Pogba left the scum, there was no sell-on clause?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top