SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,592
Your first sentence shows you still don't understand that Pep is in complete disagreement. The ball has less chance of coming anywhere near the fucking net if his game plan is stuck to. Not by giving up possession 50% (if we are lucky) of the time when the ball goes backwards to the keeper. It's all about retaining possession, inviting pressure (thus freeing up space in midfield).But then so is keeping the ball out of our net, something Hart is far more capable of doing than Willie on the worst f*cking day he ever had, my point is this is the wrong way to go about things, if Pep thinks Hart is ignoring the way he wants him to play then sort it out in the dressing room or the managers office, not putting in a keeper who everyone knows is not a patch on the guy sat on the bench under the glare of the media an making him look a c*nt.
This will put Harts back up an lead to aggro when there are far more pressing problems, not least the simple fact we do not have a competent replacement (IMO) in Willie.
The only person that can make Hart look a **** is Hart (I'm not saying he does look a ****), but ALL our players have to buy in to the game plan or there is no point in it.