City v Saints post match

Embarrassing the fans who were booing yesterday...absolute spoilt brats a lot of the city fans nowadays booing the team and pep after a few dodgy results.
Didn't hear any one booing when we won the first 10 games,now after a few dodgy results you want boo and create negativity.what a joke.
We are playing a new high risk style of football with a lot of passing out from the back,of course we are going to have a few dodgy moments/results it's still very early days give it time.
Let Pep build his team and get them used and comfortable to how he wants to play without booing them every time we have bad result.
Got arguably the best most exciting manager in the world with a fantastic young team,the fans who boo just don't bother going to games,stay at home your just spoilt new age city fans who just want instant success and glory constantly your an embarrassment to the club.
Rant over lol.




if you think the city fans were booing the city players you`re mistaken.
 
Pep said he'd learn more from our first defeat than our first five wins.

Well we've now lost two and drawn three without keeping a clean sheet......has anyone seen any lessons learned ??

Just askin like.

The only lesson I have learned from the defeats is that WE ARE NOT CAPABLE OF PLAYING FROM THE BACK AGAINST A HIGH PRESS. As a commentator mentioned, City are chasing a Utopian dream trying to play from the back. Every team in the PL knows now they have a goal in them just by forcing our defenders/goal keeper to mistakes as they are under a MANDATE to pass between them no matter what. How long is Pep going to be stubborn with this ? I thought he was more pragmatic than a philosophy guy.
 
Couldn't go yesterday so ended up watching on TV. Poor picture though and I didn't realise the goal had been disallowed until half time! Southampton wasting time from the start although first half was poor by us. Second half a lot better and we probably did just enough to grab a win. That said we are still top and we didn't get stuffed by a rival. I thought the atmosphere though was poor and most of the time the only sound coming through the TV was the players shouting. Should the team lift the crowd or vice versa. We go on about the atmosphere at grounds like Palace, Celtic, Leicester, Stoke etc yet we can't replicate it. Fed up of seeing You Tube clips of people going mad on a concourse somewhere, we have a singing section that appears not to sing!!
 
Just a reminder, as some must have forgotten. We are top of the league. But apparently, pep needs to buck his ideas up, adapt, no improvement, same old shite as last year, same problems, blah blah blah. Its bollocks. Pep has always said this would take time. If you got carried away, and i know i did, then thats fine. But don't blame him. The team was poor today, but there was nothing to suggest that once the likes of silva, kdb and kun get their form back we won't be back to our best. We went on a good run, now we are in a bad one. On average, however, we are still the best in the country. The table does not lie. So for gods sake, cheer up! Support pep and his boys. CTID

p.s. and no, i'm not drunk

Pep said we weren't good enough after we'd won 10/10. Seems like the team have agreed

He also said he learn more from defeats and set backs than victories. Anyone seen any evidence ?
 
Thought the booing was for the whistle going the moment the ball found Silva in space (metaphorically) and for the time wasting. Any other reason would be a very sad reflection on the so called fan.
 
I'm no tactical genius but dosnt playing 3 at the back just give bravo one less option /target when he wants to play out from the back?
Thinking as stones passed back central for the goal instead of to the right back
Also why has fernandinho stopped dropping to pick the ball from bravo ?
The mini slump seems to have coincided with giving sane and gundaguan more game time and dropping nolito who has been one of our better players ?
 
Thought the booing was for the whistle going the moment the ball found Silva in space (metaphorically) and for the time wasting. Any other reason would be a very sad reflection on the so called fan.

Agree. First half especially, with 2 added minutes we then looked like bucking our ideas up, I said to my dad the Clattenburg would blow as soon as we looked like making a chance, and sure enough...
 
The only lesson I have learned from the defeats is that WE ARE NOT CAPABLE OF PLAYING FROM THE BACK AGAINST A HIGH PRESS. As a commentator mentioned, City are chasing a Utopian dream trying to play from the back. Every team in the PL knows now they have a goal in them just by forcing our defenders/goal keeper to mistakes as they are under a MANDATE to pass between them no matter what. How long is Pep going to be stubborn with this ? I thought he was more pragmatic than a philosophy guy.

We will be capable in playing out from the back given time, now that may not be palatable to a majority on here, but it's what Pep wants and he'll continue to do it, short term pain for long term gain maybe.
Some might think it's foolish but it'll click as the players get used to it and hopefully the little individual errors will stop.
3 at the back, passing it out and any tactics doesn't excuse players from mis-placing passes all over the field, players trying to walk it in instead of shooting or trying to set Aguero up instead of just putting it in the net (KDB).
Think people just need to chill out a little, it'll come good as the first 10 games proved and once we start taking the chances we get we'll start steamrollering teams.
 
Can't understand why it takes until the 90th minute to book a goalkeeper for time wasting when he has been doing it since the 1st minute. Book him early on and he won't do it again.
I'm not sure that's true. I have never seen a goalie sent off for two yellow cards for time wasting. It would take a very brave referee to be so controversial. Once he got the first he seemed to take longer on his goal kicks, almost saying " up yours! you wouldn't dare give me another one".
 
Pep said we weren't good enough after we'd won 10/10. Seems like the team have agreed

He also said he learn more from defeats and set backs than victories. Anyone seen any evidence ?

It seems you are questioning the idea that we will correct this, is that the case ?

We are fucked basically ?

If not, why the question ?
 
I'm not sure that's true. I have never seen a goalie sent off for two yellow cards for time wasting. It would take a very brave referee to be so controversial. Once he got the first he seemed to take longer on his goal kicks, almost saying " up yours! you wouldn't dare give me another one".

On a wider point about time wasting, how can anyone really time waste. The ref has the watch and the whistle, the ref should be in control
 
We were wank in the first half but I actually think we played well second half.

Ref's got to be stronger with the time wasting and add 7 minutes on though.

They celebrated their goal for two minutes in the first half and time wasted every goal kick and throw in yet only two minutes were added on before half time.

Then Iheanacho was praying to his God (much to the dismay of David Silva who told him to hurry the fuck up and get playing again) for ages - from goal to kick off I bet nearly a minute had gone by, all 6 subs were used and they even took the piss with Tadic's fake substitution (should be 30 seconds for each of those so that should have been an extra 3+half minutes with Tadic added too), then all their time wasting every goal kick and throw in (I timed one goal kick that took 47 seconds and one throw in that took 25secs)... there should have been about 7 minutes on at the end of that game yesterday.
Quite agree. It goes back to the fact that the referee is the sole arbiter of time to be added on. In other sports, when the ball is out of play, the clock stops. When back in play, game on. There should be an independent timekeeper to ensure that this happens,and not left to the referee, who, in a lot of cases, makes it up as he goes along (Martin Atkinson anybody?).

When the players and managers realise that time wasting doesn't gain them an advantage, it will stop, and we may see something approaching 45 actual playing minutes per half instead of the 20 minutes we now see.

Don't hold your breath, though.
 
Quite agree. It goes back to the fact that the referee is the sole arbiter of time to be added on. In other sports, when the ball is out of play, the clock stops. When back in play, game on. There should be an independent timekeeper to ensure that this happens,and not left to the referee, who, in a lot of cases, makes it up as he goes along (Martin Atkinson anybody?).

When the players and managers realise that time wasting doesn't gain them an advantage, it will stop, and we may see something approaching 45 actual playing minutes per half instead of the 20 minutes we now see.

Don't hold your breath, though.

There definitely should be an independent timekeeper. It's far too subjective to leave to the referee and would stop managers from pressurising them. I'd also like to see official ball-in-play stats more widely published. I've had a quick look and can't find anything.
 
Lost 2 games, one against the best team in the world and one against a near rival for whom we were their home cup final.

A little worried about our ability to score against anti-football teams but I'm sure in previous seasons not only would we have failed to score enough in those games, we would have also gone on to lose many of them.

Will be able to judge better come January.
 
"Spurs anomaly aside" What makes you think that teams starting on Wed and beyond are not going to man mark our back five from restarts and force the keeper to kick long with the disadvantage of having our players back on their own goal line. Only exceptional talent can beat that sort of press and then transition forward progressively. We are seriously struggling at the moment to implement Pep's game plan and imo were lucky to get a draw yesterday. Southampton defended as well as Everton but seemed to get forward more quickly but still managed to retreat quickly enough to snuff our counters. We do manage to get the ball wide quite early but the wingers tend to get isolated and when they do get the ball in the box our forward men are usually marked and there are 2 or 3 defenders ready to mop up lose balls and clear. Silva seems to be in a bit of a rut constantly slowing down play and failing to find the killer pass. We lack steel and control in midfield and players seem rushed and unsure. The errors at the back now seem unending and make it really difficult to gather momentum within and between matches. Kun is devoid of confidence and is taking the wrong option all the time you get the feeling that if we got a penalty yesterday he would have missed again.

Can Pep turn this around. I don't think he can in the short term. However, we should not view this as a crisis we are not playing well but are still on top of the league. I think we are still 3 or 4 players light and need to accept the transitional nature of this season. Let's hope we can match last seasons yield and start to look more assured about what we are trying to do come spring time.
 
Quite agree. It goes back to the fact that the referee is the sole arbiter of time to be added on. In other sports, when the ball is out of play, the clock stops. When back in play, game on. There should be an independent timekeeper to ensure that this happens,and not left to the referee, who, in a lot of cases, makes it up as he goes along (Martin Atkinson anybody?).

When the players and managers realise that time wasting doesn't gain them an advantage, it will stop, and we may see something approaching 45 actual playing minutes per half instead of the 20 minutes we now see.

Don't hold your breath, though.

Often, when away teams waste time against us, it's their time they're wasting because we end up winning and they're chasing the game. The keeper yesterday was outrageous but if we'd had any sharpness he'd not have been timewasting at the end.
 
We were wank in the first half but I actually think we played well second half.

Ref's got to be stronger with the time wasting and add 7 minutes on though.

They celebrated their goal for two minutes in the first half and time wasted every goal kick and throw in yet only two minutes were added on before half time.

Then Iheanacho was praying to his God (much to the dismay of David Silva who told him to hurry the fuck up and get playing again) for ages - from goal to kick off I bet nearly a minute had gone by, all 6 subs were used and they even took the piss with Tadic's fake substitution (should be 30 seconds for each of those so that should have been an extra 3+half minutes with Tadic added too), then all their time wasting every goal kick and throw in (I timed one goal kick that took 47 seconds and one throw in that took 25secs)... there should have been about 7 minutes on at the end of that game yesterday.
Not sure it would have made much difference really. It is a bit worrying that as with Everton the previous week after we got back level we failed to press home the advantage. We had 35 mins to get a winner yesterday and I felt that they were just as likely as we were to score the crucial goal.
 
I'm not sure that's true. I have never seen a goalie sent off for two yellow cards for time wasting. It would take a very brave referee to be so controversial. Once he got the first he seemed to take longer on his goal kicks, almost saying " up yours! you wouldn't dare give me another one".
Clatt's might just have been the boy to make that controversial decision methinks!!!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top