Liverpool (a) Pre-Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
its the same old at anfield, keep it tight for 30 minutes, slow the game down to almost boring so to frustrate them. Hate to say it but rags game plan was perfect earlier this season.

Has Pep learned since Leicester away ? Can our defence keep it tight ? Ota and Sagna can, Kolarov is only tight when it comes to the settling the bill at Nandos, Clichy is way to slow.

Its been the same story at anfield for the last few seasons, we start passing and settling in when two goals down.

We can come away with a result no doubt, but an early goal means we are going to look silly by the time the whistle is blown.
 
Instead of who EB ?

Depends on whether you're talking about best starting XI's or say best matchday squad of 17 perhaps. Either way I would take Coutinho over any City midfield player bar DeBruyne (and the David Silva of 3 years ago), and I'd take Lallana over either Nolito or Navas. The latter is one of the most underrated creative midfielders in the Premiership. Quick feet, intense work rate, and a constant goal threat.
 
Last edited:
Silva, Sterling, Aguero to get booted all over the place by Henderson and friends without even a free kick - Fernandinho / Otamendi booked for winning first 50/50.....will be up against the officials however well city play
 
United and West Ham got results there, no reason we can't!

I woke up feeling very confident of a win, not sure why? Keep it tight, give fuck all away and let the game settle down and not turn into a cross-fest and we could be ok

We need to play in their half, but be mindful of their pace

If we want to win the Champions League, we have to beat better teams than this so let's go and put a marker down and get 2017 off to a flyer!

The key is not to be 1-0 after 10minutes

+1

Lets not forget we competed away with Barcelona until the sending off and we beat them well at home despite going a goal down, which to be fair was against the run of play....
 
No chance that Silva doesn't start.

I can't see him leaving Sergio out, and for me the only choice Pep has to make is Yaya or Sane - personally I think Pep will go with the slightly more defensive selection to start and choose Yaya, with Leroy coming on in the second half.

If we can go in level at half time we will do them, the key is not being 2 down in the first half hour, and consequently I hope that Pep's plans are all about keeping them quiet and slowing the game down early doors.

It wasn't prediction about Silva. Mind you, I can't decide what best to do and whether to sacrifice pace for ball control or vice-versa. It would seem odd to leave Sergio out when he has had a four game rest but I could see it. In fact, one of the options that appeals to me is what Exeter has talked about.
 
caballero
sag stones ota clichy
Fernando fernandinho yaya
sterling de bruyne aguero
 
The day we beat a Klopp team at Klanfield is the day that we win the league again, as it will mean we have acquired a squad with not just the skill (which we already have) but also the power and athleticism to overcome all opposition playing styles. They were my tip for the title at the start of the season and they remain the acid test IMO. I watched them the other night against Stoke and even after 75-80 minutes the pressing was absolutely maniacal, as if their lives depended on it, the man in possession hounded at full sprint speed by the nearest dipper, and the two nearest passing options closed down immediately. And even when Stoke managed to break the press with the first pass, so the process simply began again. They are absolutely relentless and once they've turned the ball over they have an array of players with not just pace but incredibly quick feet who can all fashion individual chances in packed penalty areas - Sturridge, Coutinho, Mane, Firminho, Lallana, they're all superb at it.

None of that is to say they're infallible of course. They were beaten several times last season, but almost always by muscular counterattacking teams with pace, who simply bypassed the insane pressing. Palace with Zaha and Sako, West Ham with Sakho, Valencia and Kouyate, Newcastle with Wijnaldum, Sissoko and Cisse, the rags with Martial and Rashford. It was also telling that we had the best of them in the Capital One Cup Final with Ya Ya, Fernandinho and Fernando starting, but missing Ya Ya 3 days later in the league we went with Sterling, Silva, Navas and Aguero as a diddyman attacking quartet and got bullied to the point of embarrassment in a 3-0 defeat that could easily have been 8-0. This year their failures have been even fewer, but noticeably they were frustrated by both Burnley lumping 60 yard missiles downfield to Vokes and by the rags, who did what Mourinho always does at Klanfield in selecting no less than 7 players 6ft 2' or taller and parking a gigantic bus.

As to Saturday I don't think Pep can risk his preferred style, cos if we overplay at the back then Mane & Co will tear Kolarov and Otamendi to shreds. We don't have an excess of power and pace to play long with either unfortunately, so I think a hybrid set up of the type we saw 2nd half against Barcelona is our best bet - ie. sit reasonably deep, knock it over the first wave of attackers and then hound their defensive players in the middle of the park. To that end I'd plump for Fernando, Fernandinho and Ya Ya in front of a back 4, and KDB, Silva and Sterling in a trio in front of them. 4-3-3 and leave Kun on the bench. Even that way though it'll be an almighty ask and one that I don't think we're quite ready for yet

You do like to build the opposition up but I guess the Dippers makes a change from Spurs;-)

To be serious, I do think that getting decent results regularly at Anfield is something we need to do if we are to reach the heights we aspire to as a club and I reckon this could currently be the trickiest fixture on our calendar so it is unfortuante that it is one that we really need to win.

Your six suggested front six is one that appeals to me but I am rather undecided. I'd even be tempted to use that middle three with a front 3 of Navas, Sane and Sterling, which sounds like madness and would essentially mean parking the bus, which is not how we roll.
 
Shithead statement then. It's close enough.

As I said, there was no such personal slight intended. It's just that the notion (and it's been a standard Bluemoon rejoinder for years) that some posters would rather City lost in order to better demonstrate their own 'cleverness', is nonsense IMO. Would a proper Blue really want us to lose just to score points that no-one bar the saddest of sad cases will even remember 24 hours later, on an Internet forum? Not for me
 
Bravo
Sagna Otamendi Stones Kolarov
Dinho
Sterling Yaya KDB Silva
Kun

For me yaya silva and KDB have to play to win the midfield battle
 
As I said, there was no such personal slight intended. It's just that the notion (and it's been a standard Bluemoon rejoinder for years) that some posters would rather City lost in order to better demonstrate their own 'cleverness', is nonsense IMO. Would a proper Blue really want us to lose just to score points that no-one bar the saddest of sad cases will even remember 24 hours later, on an Internet forum? Not for me

and there, my friend, is where you miss the point about what some people say on bluemoon....
 
and there, my friend, is where you miss the point about what some people say on bluemoon....

Then if the suggestion is that they are in fact rags, then would they really give a shit about looking clever in the long run? Surely their MO would merely be to shit stir in the here and now, and then go off for a little wanky? Regardless, it's still a shithead statement in my book. Suggest City might lose a game because of x, y and z, and you're either a rag or a demented Blue in thrall to your own cleverness? Maybe in extremis I suppose, but generally speaking I'm not persuaded
 
Then if the suggestion is that they are in fact rags, then would they really give a shit about looking clever in the long run? Surely their MO would merely be to shit stir in the here and now, and then go off for a little wanky? Regardless, it's still a shithead statement in my book. Suggest City might lose a game because of x, y and z, and you're either a rag or a demented Blue in thrall to your own cleverness? Maybe in extremis I suppose, but generally speaking I'm not persuaded
Crikey mate, surely you visit this forum often enough to know that some on here just like being contentious, whether they are rags or not is irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top