Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's funny that so many times there is a significant story, like the CIA presenting no evidence that Russia hacked John Podesta, and you're quiet as a mouse.

Then some minor blip of a story or a tweet and you become very vocal. So don't talk about diversion tactics. A 6 year old plagiarism story, whoopdi fucking do.

Yeah, see, it doesn't work like that. The topic at hand is Mr. Trump. The other side is no longer relevant. He won. He -- and you -- have to stand on your own two feet now. Not especially surprisingly, you're both wobbly.
 
Yeah, see, it doesn't work like that. The topic at hand is Mr. Trump. The other side is no longer relevant. He won. He -- and you -- have to stand on your own two feet now. Not especially surprisingly, you're both wobbly.
So you'll all stop talking about the DNC 'hack' in this thread? (Don't forget, without the DNC hack you won't be able to talk about the evil Ruskies either).

'Cause honestly that would make my day.

It's a valid question whether you like it or not, addressed at you personally, you don't need to awnser. Do you hold every one to the same standard that you hold Trump? In this instance that they are responsible for the actions of their subordinates (actions that took place 6 & 18 years ago).
 
Last edited:
So you'll all stop talking about the DNC 'hack' in this thread? (Don't forget, without the DNC hack you won't be able to talk about the evil Ruskies either).

'Cause honestly that would make my day.

It's a valid question whether you like it or not, addressed at you personally, you don't need to awnser. Do you hold every one to the same standard that you hold Trump? In this instance that they are responsible for the actions of their subordinates (actions that took place 6 & 18 years ago).

I haven't once mentioned the hack, and yes I do. I hold especially him to the highest standard I can -- he's the President of my country. Hence why I could never support him regardless of politics and platform -- I know too much about him as a businessman. He's a flake of monstrous proportions.
 
Priebus: Trump accepts report that Russia was behind hacking

President-elect Trump believes the report released by U.S. intelligence officials Friday saying that the Russians were behind the hacking in the presidential election in November, incoming White House chief of staff Reince Priebus said Sunday. Priebus told "Fox News Sunday" that Trump "accepts the findings" of the report and is not denying that the Russians were behind the campaign. According to the report, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an "influence campaign" and wanted to "undermine the public faith" in the U.S. democratic process.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...hat-russia-was-behind-hacking/article/2611210
 
Sexted a 15 year old. In fact he groomed her for several months. 'I'm going to bust your tight pussy' yeah right, we all know dems have tiny peckers.

I'm not sure why a conviction is necessary? I speed all the time, just because I don't get a ticket doesn't mean I'm not breaking the law.
Does your insurance rate indicate you are an habitual speeder, ORDFO they wait until you get the citation, conviction, points, etc...?

I think when you CALL someone a pedophile, that kinda requires a conviction, doesn't it?! Or, ar you so right wing, just a Daily Mail report suffices?!

As for his pecker, I guess you haven't seen the dick pics!
 
Does your insurance rate indicate you are an habitual speeder, ORDFO they wait until you get the citation, conviction, points, etc...?

I think when you CALL someone a pedophile, that kinda requires a conviction, doesn't it?! Or, ar you so right wing, just a Daily Mail report suffices?!

As for his pecker, I guess you haven't seen the dick pics!
Uh, no?

A Daily Mail report, you're being disingenuous and you know it. There's photographic evidence and the small fact that he issued a statement along the lines of: 'My bad guys, you know I can't help myself when it comes to sexting people LOL'.
 
Uh, no?

A Daily Mail report, you're being disingenuous and you know it. There's photographic evidence and the small fact that he issued a statement along the lines of: 'My bad guys, you know I can't help myself when it comes to sexting people LOL'.
To my knowledge, he is a serial setter, but this is the first time he has been in touch with someone so young. Whether that remains the case is under investigation.

Regardless, not quite sure why we are taking cheap shots at all and sundry Democrats. Is it because you are feeling a little defensive over your choice of a President? Tick tock tick tock.....coming ready or not!
 
To my knowledge, he is a serial setter, but this is the first time he has been in touch with someone so young. Whether that remains the case is under investigation.

Regardless, not quite sure why we are taking cheap shots at all and sundry Democrats. Is it because you are feeling a little defensive over your choice of a President? Tick tock tick tock.....coming ready or not!
You know for a fact my faith in the President Elect can't be shaken... but you're right of course, the Democrats are irrelevant for the next 8 years so I'll stop talking about them in this thread.

12 more days...

trump_house.jpg
 
BP8,

While I can certainly TRY to admire such blind confidence in an otherwise educated man, 8 years is clearly a typo. There are THREE House and Senate elections between now and the end of ANY second term by Trump. Given where we are headed, I find it hard to believe he will have a Senate majority, or maybe even a House majority by the time he leaves office. The House is much harder, because, of course, the first things Rs do when they get in power is to gerrymander districts to STAY in power.

The REAL problem with Trump is the SCOTUS pick, and the REQUIREMENT for at least two Dems who wanted to retire to stay alive until President Newsome is elected in 2020!

P.S. That is a far less blingy Trump WH than most have envisaged!
 
I'm honestly baffled as to why he loves Trump so much. I can understand the hatred of Hilary, she's fucking awful. But to champion a ferret wearing shit gibbon with such ferver when you're not even American is utterly fucking baffling.

I think it's just human nature. He needs to latch onto one of those "fuck you, we got our revenge, we won" euphorias everyone sees in the movies. It's quite a high. I totally get it, especially if little else in life has given someone that kind of a feeling of pleasure. Hell, that's why most of us follow sport. Problem is, there's a lot more at stake here than in sport.
 
BP8,

While I can certainly TRY to admire such blind confidence in an otherwise educated man, 8 years is clearly a typo. There are THREE House and Senate elections between now and the end of ANY second term by Trump. Given where we are headed, I find it hard to believe he will have a Senate majority, or maybe even a House majority by the time he leaves office. The House is much harder, because, of course, the first things Rs do when they get in power is to gerrymander districts to STAY in power.

The REAL problem with Trump is the SCOTUS pick, and the REQUIREMENT for at least two Dems who wanted to retire to stay alive until President Newsome is elected in 2020!

P.S. That is a far less blingy Trump WH than most have envisaged!

I personally don't think he's running for a second term regardless -- he''ll say he changed politics forever and now that the country is "fixed" (double entendre intended) or "on the right track" he'll go back to bulldozing bungalows near his golf courses and feeling up female newscasters. Oh, and not paying people the money he owes them.

I think 2020 is too early for Newsom but damned if I know who the Democrats can run. He's going to make for Governor of CA next of course in 18. Will be interesting; I've met him and his wife a few times and know a bunch of people who them well; they grew up in the same county as I did (in my school district) and know a lot of friends of mine from high school.

I'm not quite as worried about the SC as most are I think. History has shown time and time again that when the court looks like it's going to become politicized, the moderates lean the ship the other direction. I prefer a moderate SC anyway -- the tension between legislating from the bench and a stricter read of the Constitution should always be maintained IMO -- takes a lot of smart minds with many different perspectives to interpret laws well, and the justices know and have always known it. Bring back Potter Stewart!!
 
I think it's just human nature. He needs to latch onto one of those "fuck you, we got our revenge, we won" euphorias everyone sees in the movies.

Supported him since the Primaries bud and was very vocal about it on here!

giphy.gif


You might enjoy latching on to successful people but that's not how I role. I just know a winner when I see one.

And it's funny (it's not) how you can go off topic whenever you like and discuss me and my motives and how much pleasure I derive from life, but as soon as I talk about the DNC you start having a shit fit and scream: "THIS THREAD IS FOR TRUMP ONLY REEEEEEE!!!"
 
Last edited:
I'm honestly baffled as to why he loves Trump so much. I can understand the hatred of Hilary, she's fucking awful. But to champion a ferret wearing shit gibbon with such ferver when you're not even American is utterly fucking baffling.
He's like the Pope man, his love knows no nationally. It spreads to all corners like jam on a well jammed piece of warm toast. Open your heart and you too can join the Trump train.
 
Various news outlets have a differing take on it, so I'll ask on here for clarification.... What is in, or is likely to be in these emails set to be released this week? What did the King of Morocco give hillary $12m for? Is she likely to face charges?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top