Like I said to you already Bill, I'd have no issue with that but perhaps Pep sees doing that as more damaging long term. Maybe he believes that he can play his way back into form and that dropping him will destroy whatever confidence he has left.
I really don't think it's about Bravo himself. I'm certain it's about facts. Bravo is a superior shot stopper to Willy, and an even far superior footballer to boot.
So assuming it is true that his confidence is shot, dropping him will actually cause more problems than it solves. As we'd be poorer in possession and concede more shots then.
The argument being made by the "Pseudo Joe Hart fan club" is that the superiority in shotstopping ability they have now suddenly ascribed to Willy is so much more superior to Bravo's, that even with an increased number of shots against, it would end up an overall positive for City.
Pep doesn't seem to buy that argument. Neither do I. On average, Bravo has given up 6 more goals over this season, than a comparable keeper should have based on regression statistics (or some shit I don't fully understand- Sqwuaka can explain better).
However, his team partly due to a play style he has been instrumental to (or at worst a equal participant in) City has conceded 24 fewer chances than a team with similar stats would have. So the claim.here is that if we switch Keepers over the next 16 games. Willy will not only save the 4-5 of those shot Bravo is unlikely to save if this form continues, but he'd also save another 4-7 extra shots to boot from the 14-18 more shots we are likely to concede due to a switch away from the Sweeper keeper system.
When viewed in such clinical light, it's not hard to see why Pep might rather stick it out with Bravo. Clearly, to the dismay of those who prefer to believe their eyes and trust what they see (: