Claudio Bravo - 2016/2017 performances (continued)

[Utter bobbins]

Even they aren't always right judging by the number of sackings every season.

Think I'd rather trust their judgement than some expert on the end of a keyboard

 

[01cravend]

So, you've failed to answer then?
He's mainly conceded one on ones, snap shots and unopposed close range finishing.
Nothing specific to his suitability in this league.

One goal in Barcelona is the only one I could consider being due to his suitability and skill set. That wasn't even in the Prem.

If he's so unsuitable to this league I'm sure you've got countless specific examples!

I'd go as far as saying I've no idea what you mean by saying he's not suited to this league. By your lack of a response I'd say you don't either. Just another 'popular opinion' with zero substance.

Couldn't give a shit, in fact I'm delighted to be in the minoriety on here. Earlier you were trying to convince us that rotating full backs was comparable to giving the reserve keeper the cup games!

Ill respond to you when i have my ordinateur.

The absolute minority included the bloke who picks the team

Included - past tense? ;)

 

[i kne albert davy]

Think I'd rather trust their judgement than some expert on the end of a keyboard

I counter your trust with an Alan Ball

 

[schfc6]

The absolute minority included the bloke who picks the team

But what does Pep know?

 

[Utter bobbins]

Ill respond to you when i have my ordinateur.



Included - past tense? ;)

Good comeback

 

[Utter bobbins]

I counter your trust with an Alan Ball

Well done

 

[SWP's back]

Still can't work out what so many blues get out of slagging off their own keeper on here but each to their own.

 

[01cravend]

Good comeback

Almost as good as your English

 

[Utter bobbins]

Almost as good as your English

Once again well done

 

[Dax777]

Even they aren't always right judging by the number of sackings every season.

True. But neither are those in the majority 'always' right. So it begs the question: What good is pointing out that he is in the minority when we know being in the majority or minority of an opinion often has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of said opinion?

It is another one of those "pointfree" add-ons that actually adds nothing.

 

[Dax777]

Still can't work out what so many blues get out of slagging off their own keeper on here but each to their own.

In fairnes, sometimes we can be viscerally opposed to something, including one of our players. I have felt similarly about Kolarov many times In the past. And this might in fact be the first season where I don't feel this way about any of our players.

I maybe disappointed with some, but not angry and disappointed to a point of having a disdain for them.

I genuinely used to feel that way about Kolarov. I have grown less disheartened and grown to be okay with what he is.

That said, I never pretended my displeasure was all factual bluke the "Joe Hart boys and girls brigade" do :-)

 

[i kne albert davy]

True. But neither are those in the majority 'always' right. So it begs the question: What good is pointing out that he is in the minority when we know being in the majority or minority of an opinion often has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of said opinion?

It is another one of those "pointfree" add-ons that actually adds nothing.

Your'e related to Taxi aren't yer.

 

[01cravend]

True. But neither are those in the majority 'always' right. So it begs the question: What good is pointing out that he is in the minority when we know being in the majority or minority of an opinion often has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of said opinion?

It is another one of those "pointfree" add-ons that actually adds nothing.

Poor attempt at conversion

 

[kaz7]

In fairnes, sometimes we can be viscerally opposed to something, including one of our players. I have felt similarly about Kolarov many times In the past. And this might in fact be the first season where I don't feel this way about any of our players.

I maybe disappointed with some, but not angry and disappointed to a point of having a disdain for them.

I genuinely used to feel that way about Kolarov. I have grown less disheartened and grown to be okay with what he is.

That said, I never pretended my displeasure was all factual bluke the "Joe Hart boys and girls brigade" do :-)

Cut that joe stuff out will you,that's twice today and it's a lazy arguement

 

[Benarbia]

A good keeper closes down the angle. Against Chelsea he pretty much gave William the whole net to score. His technique is either flawed or he's aged to the point he's too slow

 

[Dax777]

Cut that joe stuff out will you,that's twice today and it's a lazy arguement

You'd know, you are good at lazy arguments.

 

[Dax777]

A good keeper closes down the angle. Against Chelsea he pretty much gave William the whole net to score. His technique is either flawed or he's aged to the point he's too slow

Or his suffering a dip new players in new leagues sometimes do.

 

[kaz7]

You'd know, you are good at lazy arguments.

Contribute or don't bother

 

[Bill]

Or his suffering a dip new players in new leagues sometimes do.

So ease him in slowly. You don't blood a keeper away v the rags.

 

[Dax777]

So ease him in slowly. You don't blood a keeper away v the rags.

That's a Pep issue. Albeit I don't buy into that type of thinking. It's archaic old adage that carryno real truth. Nastacic got his start at Barnebau if I remember correctly.

But I agree he should be benched just for the value change might bring. He is still our best Longterm option for this season. And I think Pep realizes that.