Media persecution of Raheem Sterling

casserole of nonsense said:
I won't be demeaning myself to check in person, but would it, perchance, have been replaced by a headline article telling us how many millions of East Europeans are going to flood into U.K. before the Brexit drawbridge goes up?
Just a wild guess.
Click to expand...

I don't think there will be a flood 'cos a lot of them might think that the minute before or the minute after the drawbridge is raised they might be 'returned' to their place of origin.
 
City need to do more to protect their players. Raheem keeps getting harassed, the club should ban that journalist, or better yet the newspaper from all press conferences for 6 months.

I wish our club had a backbone!
 
Manchester33 said:
City need to do more to protect their players. Raheem keeps getting harassed, the club should ban that journalist, or better yet the newspaper from all press conferences for 6 months.

I wish our club had a backbone!
Click to expand...

You really think banning would solve the problem?
 
Rolee said:
You really think banning would solve the problem?
Click to expand...
Yes, less coverage of one of the biggest clubs in the world would cost them a lot of money. It would make them think twice about harassing players.

Worked well for Ferguson.
 
Unless I've missed it I don't think there has been a statement by City or the PFA on the media persecution of Sterling.

Why so quiet Gordon Taylor?
 
Kompany is King said:
Unless I've missed it I don't think there has been a statement by City or the PFA on the media persecution of Sterling.

Why so quiet Gordon Taylor?
Click to expand...
Is he still alive?

Taylor has disappeared the last year or so, think he's eaten at the trough so much he can't even lift his hand to use a phone now let alone get off his fat arse.
 
Manchester33 said:
Yes, less coverage of one of the biggest clubs in the world would cost them a lot of money. It would make them think twice about harassing players.

Worked well for Ferguson.
Click to expand...

Less coverage, how?

The last journo I can recall the club banning is Dan Roan of the BBC in 2012, two years later Dan went on to become the editor of BBC Sport, a position he still holds today. In light of this and the apparent treatment we get from the Beeb ( see BBC bias thread ) it would seem the banning didn't really work out too well for us.
 
Rolee said:
Less coverage, how?

The last journo I can recall the club banning is Dan Roan of the BBC in 2012, two years later Dan went on to become the editor of BBC Sport, a position he still holds today. In light of this and the apparent treatment we get from the Beeb ( see BBC bias thread ) it would seem the banning didn't really work out too well for us.
Click to expand...
We should ban the lot of them then.
 
Banning isn't the solution for me.
The approach should be to give preferential treatment to certain journalists/media which produce more positive content about City.
Play them off against each other.

When one paper/website is getting millions more hits because it has an exclusive Gabriel Jesus interview, or breaking news that we've just signed some superstar... The gutterpress who have written negatively about us will think twice about doing it next time
 
Why Always Ste said:
Banning isn't the solution for me.
The approach should be to give preferential treatment to certain journalists/media which produce more positive content about City.
Play them off against each other.

When one paper/website is getting millions more hits because it has an exclusive Gabriel Jesus interview, or breaking news that we've just signed some superstar... The gutterpress who have written negatively about us will think twice about doing it next time
Click to expand...




THIS
 
Why Always Ste said:
Banning isn't the solution for me.
The approach should be to give preferential treatment to certain journalists/media which produce more positive content about City.
Play them off against each other.

When one paper/website is getting millions more hits because it has an exclusive Gabriel Jesus interview, or breaking news that we've just signed some superstar... The gutterpress who have written negatively about us will think twice about doing it next time
Click to expand...

Is the right answer.

The example of the Govan pisscan banning journos is always brought up but what people are failing to recognise is that he got away with that because the media needed the rags at the time more than the rags needed them. We're not even remotely close to being in a similar situation.
 
Well some sort of personal consequence for those so called journalists must be if you ask me. Why else did it work when GPC banned them?
Why not combine bans and preferred treatment, to play these fuckers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top