Thank you.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Matthijs de Ligt
- Thread starter BlueDejong
- Start date
BosnianBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 4,003
- Team supported
- City
I hope PSG signs De Ligt just to make people who are adopting dippers mentality very angry.
Last edited:
Franknorgrovesnephew
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 4,555
FloatsI have already made my point. See post above.
I'll let you guys moan about PSG money if it suits your boat
I agree but i dont even understand why some on here have such an hard
I agree.
What i don't understand is the contempt for PSG money here.
PSG has his money and spends it how it see fit.
City does the same.
Why all those moral lessons (i must be proud, players only go for money etc.) ?
PSG has a goal : winning the CL. They use their resources the way they think they will achieve it.
Same goes for any club.
I agree but I think if you stick your head above the parapet on a rival fans forum you are likely to run into one or two less reasonable characters so don't take it personally.
To be honest though it looks like CityTilIdie84 is just having a laugh; maybe the humour doesn't translate across cultures.
"Farmers league" got me, I'm dying.
In fact, you are maybe not aware about this but it is a tired meme used on internet (especially on speaking social media like twitter, reddit, etc.).I agree but I think if you stick your head above the parapet on a rival fans forum you are likely to run into one or two less reasonable characters so don't take it personally.
To be honest though it looks like CityTilIdie84 is just having a laugh; maybe the humour doesn't translate across cultures.
"Farmers league" got me, I'm dying.
It is the equivalent of people saying Manchester City fans are dressing as blue seats because their stadium is empty or Emptyhad.
I've not agreed with some of what you've said when we were in discussion earlier.I sincerely find hilarious all your arguments about the money of PSG.
City has more money and does spend more money that PSG but somehow players only join PSG for money but not City...
I still remember the days when we were selling you Anelka and Distin. Your opinions about PSG and City were probably not the same. City was just promoted and spent their record transfer for a central back.
I thought you were way off the mark but that's cool.
However, but in respect of what you've said above I think your spot on. I haven't got a clue who has got the most money between city and psg but I do believe that like psg, a lot of are players definitely come to City for the money, or at least that is high up on the priorities alongside the football, manager etc. This does not make either of the players who join City or psg bad persons. I think it means they have great agents and they themselves are sensible about wanting to secure their financial futures. City ain't utd nor Liverpool, we don't have players who have yearned to play for the club since they were in their mother's womb. Maybe Foden but that's it.
Thank you.I've not agreed with some of what you've said when we were in discussion earlier.
I thought you were way off the mark but that's cool.
However, but in respect of what you've said above I think your spot on. I haven't got a clue who has got the most money between city and psg but I do believe that like psg, a lot of are players definitely come to City for the money, or at least that is high up on the priorities alongside the football, manager etc. This does not make either of the players who join City or psg bad persons. I think it means they have great agents and they themselves are sensible about wanting to secure their financial futures. City ain't utd nor Liverpool, we don't have players who have yearned to play for the club since they were in their mother's womb. Maybe Foden but that's it.
I think this whole talk of money or "legacy" is bollocks as the biggest clubs in the world do spend the biggest wages.
Football players are professionals and they want the money they think they are worth.
PSG spending a lot in wages is not something to applaud, but it is not something to be ashamed off either imo. It is a risk. If the player delivers, everyone is happy. If the player fails, you have yourself a new Sanchez case.
And PSG is suffering from that when they try to offload Jesé, Kurzawa, Draxler and others.
Further I noticed you had a few comments from others earlier. Don't get sucked in. Just ignore them or like I intend to do suss out how to use the please ignore feature if you find the usual suspects piling on again with odd comments. We disagreed but to be honest I liked your different perspective on things. You weren't rude and you weren't on the wind up, so your okay as far as I'm concerned.I sincerely find hilarious all your arguments about the money of PSG.
City has more money and does spend more money that PSG but somehow players only join PSG for money but not City...
I still remember the days when we were selling you Anelka and Distin. Your opinions about PSG and City were probably not the same. City was just promoted and spent their record transfer for a central back.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I have already made my point. See post above.
I'll let you guys moan about PSG money if it suits your boat
Floats
Correct, it's 'suits your floats'.
MCFC_4Heatons
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2016
- Messages
- 491
FFP doesn't apply to PSG - They've got a man on the inside now and UEFA accidently on purpose messed up when re-opening an investigation into PSG, so CAS overuled on a technicality .... UEFA are either completely incompentent or they pick and choose their targets