PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I don’t seem to recall too many articles about Bayern Munich where their owners and sponsors seem to all sit on the Advisory Board. Where are the Athletic with that one?
Yeah, based on that logic you'd probably want to avoid looking at the entire history of football tbqh. Liverpool FC wouldn't exist!
 
Just watched the Stefan and Jamie Jackson piece there from yesterday.

No idea why people on here are getting mad at either of them. A perfectly reasonable discussion and questions asked, to be fair.
Don't think JJ came across as bitter or anti City at all tbh.
 
The real winners are the American cartel who have got the pl to take this action. To smeer our reputation our achievements etc.
The American cartel have also got this done on the cheap for themselves by only having to 'pay' one nineth of the cost. The cartel has got the other pl clubs to pay for their whitch hunt aid and albeit by the press/media
Are we paying our own fees plus 1/20 of the cunts fees?
 
I've flipped flopped in terms of my postivity/negativity around the hearing over the past few months.

Have flipped back to the negative side this week after realising that despite all the ITK talk that we're going to be cleared, no one really knows or has heard anything from within the club.

Also, we were told that an early verdict would be good for us, the longer this drags the more negative i'm getting.

Don't worry.

A verdict would only be early if many of the allegations had been thrown out, which was never likely to happen, in which case the award could be relatively short. That was always a long shot.

It was always much more likely that the verdict would take 3-5 months, and if you take a lawyers' Christmas break into account, we are just about entering that period now.

It could come next week, or it could come in two months. Nothing to do but wait, but it isn't a sign of anything other than the panel being thorough in the hearing and in the deliberation and publication of the award.

Imho.
 
As far as I can tell, it's irrelevant. All the talk around who this Mohammed guy is, that is, not @slbsn 's post, which is interesting.

The fundamentals of the transaction and how it's accounted for don't really change even if the shadowy, mysterious Person X turned out to be Mansour himself .....

Imho.

I think the Athletic can’t get their head round so many people from the UAE all being called Mohamed.
 
I agree. Plus just found this below. Clearly, City's enemies do find it critical but without that UEFA report being made public it is hard to be definitive as to why.



The UAE wouldn't exist without Al Suwaidi. When Sheikh Zayed wanted to unite the states, under one Government (mainly through bribery), Al Suwaidi was the guy they sent around to the other leaders with the money and offers. He was considered to have been a huge part of bringing in the smaller non Abu Dhabi/Dubai tribes.

A lot of the information on the history of the UAE and its setup actually comes from places like the CIA. And they generally consider the familial, loyalty and power structures to be completely impenetrable to anybody who isn't an actual member of the UAE ruling class. Nobody understands who works for who, who is powerful and who is just a name or nepotism hire. Who works at where and in what roles. Not Government intelligence agencies, let alone The Athletic.

Their culture is a polygamous society where family honor and duty is considered paramount. As I mentioned at the time, Sheikh Mansour is UAE Vice President as a punishment to the Dubai ruling family for embarrassing the country by needing a financial bailout. Sheikh Mansour has 21 siblings by Western definitions. He has 6 by UAE definitions. Though if any of the remaining 15 were to embarass themselves then it would be the fault of the UAE President (the head of the 6) who doesn't consider them family in the way we do and would be a major scandal. They're more akin to how we would view distant cousins.

The relationship between the current head of the Al Suwaidis and the current head of the Al Nahyan families (MBZ) is a much more "influential" one on the UAE Presidency than one of MBZ's brothers (in the 15) on MBZ. That doesn't make sense to Western ideas, how can some guy your Dad knew have more influence over you than your own brother?

These stories don't mean anything because there's about 4 families in Abu Dhabi (well, 1 and 2 quarters I guess) who own anything and they're all inter married. This how we get shit like this and the "Man City paid Michael Oliver" nonsense. It's impossible to do any sort of business in the entire UAE without being able to link it to anybody else in the UAE.
 
BBC Football feed says Pep's Press conference is at 12.30 today.

I mention here because there's a small possibility he might be asked about the 115 verdict.
 
I think the Athletic can’t get their head round so many people from the UAE all being called Mohamed.
I'm not joking or being facetious here, but the problem that UEFA, the PL and the press have essentially boil down to this. They dont know who is who and put Western values onto a non Western culture that doesn't adhere to them
 
Six years from the date of "disclosure" in the case of fraud or concealment, I think. So from 2018. The allegations were referred in 2023, so not time limited if fraud or concealment is involved.

Unless I am wrong, of course ....
Obviously we don't know what the EPL have as evidence If they have any at all but presuming the Epl have only got the same info as CAS, wouldn't the disclosure start when Uefa first accused us of fraud or am I missing something
 
It’s gone on too long now. When the decision is finally announced I think we should all just ignore it and go on like none of this ever happened.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top