Search results

Here’s my grassy knoll theory... Has anyone got someone working for them (or at their place of work) who they really want to get rid of, but no matter what they can think of it just won’t work as it seems they’re Teflon coated?? Step forward Mr Leterme...is it beyond the realms of possibility...

Amongst the best lines they have are “When the fun stops, stop” and “Bet responsibly”. If punters did, they’d soon go out of business...they rely and prey upon punters hoping the next win will be a big one, the adrenaline rush of winning and the desperation behind it all...

And of course, debt didn’t get mentioned...quelle surprise...

Even if the “announcement” has been delayed few days for the draw, there’s no way both parties would agree to not being told on the 10th, if that is the original date...

Don’t know if it’s been mentioned in a previous post (there’s just so many pages!!) but as the case was scheduled for 3 days, is it likely to have lasted this long if it was argued, and accepted, on the first day that a line was drawn under the agreement and couldn’t be opened again or would...

Made me think of this!!

https://twitter.com/search?q=migueldelaney&src=recent_search_click

The current owners are merely custodians of our club until they leave, therefore it will have absolutely no impact on my love for the club...

Once the verdict is passed down, whatever it is, is that it or are we under the cosh for the next 5 years whereby they can revisit it?? Also, unless it’s a fine only (for lack of cooperation), but covered under a non-disclosure no guilt result, surely we will be in the PL crosshairs for...

It’s when Tolmie’s hairdoo puts a vid up for me...I know something’s afoot, I just don’t know what!!!

It’s been like the “It’s quiet” threads...you go for a brew and you’ve got 10 pages waiting for you when you get back!!

I’ll bet there are a few employers out there who’ll be glad when this is over...seems everyone has been on here every day a lately!!

I would imagine that Infantino would have been a good shout...

I can’t believe we haven’t got anyone on “Chambers” watch!!!!

They’ll just probably change the rules to not allow the Cup holders to participate...after all, they changed it so that the dippers could be included after they won it and were outside the top 4...and of course rely on “public perception” to make sure we aren’t put forward by the FA...

Wouldn’t the “5 year time limit” bar UEFA looking at the case again if it was kicked back to them??

I’m sure Delooney will give the verdict tomorrow on Sunday Supp...I wonder if UEFA and the CAS are aware...

Does the judges decision have to be 3-0, or will a simple 2-1 be enough either way??

Do you not think that UEFA would use it as an excuse to kick English teams out of Europe this season??

It will be interesting to see how they get round the 14 day isolation that the government have brought in....